Alignment of electronic energy levels at electrochemical interfaces

Jun Cheng, Michiel Sprik

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

121 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The position of electronic energy levels in a phase depends on the surface potentials at its boundaries. Bringing two phases in contact at an interface will alter the surface potentials shifting the energy levels relative to each other. Calculating such shifts for electrochemical interfaces requires a combination of methods from computational surface science and physical chemistry. The problem is closely related to the computation of potentials of electrochemically inactive electrodes. These so-called ideally polarizable interfaces are impossible to cross for electrons. In this perspective we review two density functional theory based methods that have been developed for this purpose, the workfunction method and the hydrogen insertion method. The key expressions of the two methods are derived from the formal theory of absolute electrode potentials. As an illustration of the workfunction method we review the computation of the potential of zero charge of the Pt(111)–water interface as recently published by a number of groups. The example of the hydrogen insertion method is from our own work on the rutile TiO2(110)–water interface at the point of zero proton charge. The calculations are summarized in level diagrams aligning the electronic energy levels of the solid electrode (Fermi level of the metal, valence band maximum and conduction band minimum of the semiconductor) to the band edges of liquid water and the standard potential for the reduction of the hydroxyl radical. All potentials are calculated at the same level of density functional theory using the standard hydrogen electrode as common energy reference. Comparison to experiment identifies the treatment of the valence band of water as a potentially dangerous source of error for application to electrocatalysis and photocatalysis.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)11245-11267
Number of pages23
JournalPhysical Chemistry Chemical Physics
Volume14
Issue number32
Early online date19 Jun 2012
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 28 Aug 2012

Fingerprint

Electron energy levels
energy levels
alignment
Hydrogen
Electrodes
Water
Valence bands
electronics
Density functional theory
Physical chemistry
Electrocatalysis
Photocatalysis
water
Fermi level
Conduction bands
electrodes
insertion
Hydroxyl Radical
hydrogen
Protons

Cite this

Alignment of electronic energy levels at electrochemical interfaces. / Cheng, Jun; Sprik, Michiel.

In: Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, Vol. 14, No. 32, 28.08.2012, p. 11245-11267.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cheng, Jun ; Sprik, Michiel. / Alignment of electronic energy levels at electrochemical interfaces. In: Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics. 2012 ; Vol. 14, No. 32. pp. 11245-11267.
@article{3f8cf93462b64e1ab55314bceab5f478,
title = "Alignment of electronic energy levels at electrochemical interfaces",
abstract = "The position of electronic energy levels in a phase depends on the surface potentials at its boundaries. Bringing two phases in contact at an interface will alter the surface potentials shifting the energy levels relative to each other. Calculating such shifts for electrochemical interfaces requires a combination of methods from computational surface science and physical chemistry. The problem is closely related to the computation of potentials of electrochemically inactive electrodes. These so-called ideally polarizable interfaces are impossible to cross for electrons. In this perspective we review two density functional theory based methods that have been developed for this purpose, the workfunction method and the hydrogen insertion method. The key expressions of the two methods are derived from the formal theory of absolute electrode potentials. As an illustration of the workfunction method we review the computation of the potential of zero charge of the Pt(111)–water interface as recently published by a number of groups. The example of the hydrogen insertion method is from our own work on the rutile TiO2(110)–water interface at the point of zero proton charge. The calculations are summarized in level diagrams aligning the electronic energy levels of the solid electrode (Fermi level of the metal, valence band maximum and conduction band minimum of the semiconductor) to the band edges of liquid water and the standard potential for the reduction of the hydroxyl radical. All potentials are calculated at the same level of density functional theory using the standard hydrogen electrode as common energy reference. Comparison to experiment identifies the treatment of the valence band of water as a potentially dangerous source of error for application to electrocatalysis and photocatalysis.",
author = "Jun Cheng and Michiel Sprik",
year = "2012",
month = "8",
day = "28",
doi = "10.1039/c2cp41652b",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "11245--11267",
journal = "Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics",
issn = "1463-9076",
publisher = "ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY",
number = "32",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Alignment of electronic energy levels at electrochemical interfaces

AU - Cheng, Jun

AU - Sprik, Michiel

PY - 2012/8/28

Y1 - 2012/8/28

N2 - The position of electronic energy levels in a phase depends on the surface potentials at its boundaries. Bringing two phases in contact at an interface will alter the surface potentials shifting the energy levels relative to each other. Calculating such shifts for electrochemical interfaces requires a combination of methods from computational surface science and physical chemistry. The problem is closely related to the computation of potentials of electrochemically inactive electrodes. These so-called ideally polarizable interfaces are impossible to cross for electrons. In this perspective we review two density functional theory based methods that have been developed for this purpose, the workfunction method and the hydrogen insertion method. The key expressions of the two methods are derived from the formal theory of absolute electrode potentials. As an illustration of the workfunction method we review the computation of the potential of zero charge of the Pt(111)–water interface as recently published by a number of groups. The example of the hydrogen insertion method is from our own work on the rutile TiO2(110)–water interface at the point of zero proton charge. The calculations are summarized in level diagrams aligning the electronic energy levels of the solid electrode (Fermi level of the metal, valence band maximum and conduction band minimum of the semiconductor) to the band edges of liquid water and the standard potential for the reduction of the hydroxyl radical. All potentials are calculated at the same level of density functional theory using the standard hydrogen electrode as common energy reference. Comparison to experiment identifies the treatment of the valence band of water as a potentially dangerous source of error for application to electrocatalysis and photocatalysis.

AB - The position of electronic energy levels in a phase depends on the surface potentials at its boundaries. Bringing two phases in contact at an interface will alter the surface potentials shifting the energy levels relative to each other. Calculating such shifts for electrochemical interfaces requires a combination of methods from computational surface science and physical chemistry. The problem is closely related to the computation of potentials of electrochemically inactive electrodes. These so-called ideally polarizable interfaces are impossible to cross for electrons. In this perspective we review two density functional theory based methods that have been developed for this purpose, the workfunction method and the hydrogen insertion method. The key expressions of the two methods are derived from the formal theory of absolute electrode potentials. As an illustration of the workfunction method we review the computation of the potential of zero charge of the Pt(111)–water interface as recently published by a number of groups. The example of the hydrogen insertion method is from our own work on the rutile TiO2(110)–water interface at the point of zero proton charge. The calculations are summarized in level diagrams aligning the electronic energy levels of the solid electrode (Fermi level of the metal, valence band maximum and conduction band minimum of the semiconductor) to the band edges of liquid water and the standard potential for the reduction of the hydroxyl radical. All potentials are calculated at the same level of density functional theory using the standard hydrogen electrode as common energy reference. Comparison to experiment identifies the treatment of the valence band of water as a potentially dangerous source of error for application to electrocatalysis and photocatalysis.

U2 - 10.1039/c2cp41652b

DO - 10.1039/c2cp41652b

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 11245

EP - 11267

JO - Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics

JF - Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics

SN - 1463-9076

IS - 32

ER -