Alter-rights: Haiti and the Singularization of Universal Human Rights, 1804-2004

Nick Nesbitt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

To rethink human rights when they have become little more than hollow ideology in the hands not only of nation-states but of the UN as well requires a radical change in perspective. This article will thus look back to one of the key moments in the history of human emancipation – the Haitian Revolution – to ask whether it might hold, in its unfulfilled potential, implications for overcoming the contemporary impasse of human rights discourse. Unlike the earlier French and US revolutions, which extended putatively ‘universal’ rights only to limited categories of citizens (typically white, adult, male property-holders) Haiti was alone in the early-modern world in its implementation of an unqualified, immediate ban on human slavery. For all its daring originality, however, the Haitian intervention never lived up to its historical promise. Both internal political divisions and the international pressure of contemporary slave-holding states such as France and the United States consistently undermined the Haitian initiative throughout the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. In the second part of this article, analysis of this historical process will lead me to consider the ways in which the works of Edwidge Danticat and Peter Hallward stand as contemporary interventions that remain faithful to this unfulfilled legacy of 1804.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)93-108
Number of pages16
JournalInternational Journal of Francophone Studies
Volume12
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2009

Fingerprint

Haiti
human rights
emancipation
slavery
slave
ban
nation state
UNO
nineteenth century
twentieth century
ideology
France
citizen
discourse
history
Human Rights

Keywords

  • Haitian revolution
  • Haiti
  • Toussaint Louverture
  • human rights
  • radical enlightenment
  • Robespierre

Cite this

Alter-rights : Haiti and the Singularization of Universal Human Rights, 1804-2004. / Nesbitt, Nick.

In: International Journal of Francophone Studies, Vol. 12, No. 1, 01.04.2009, p. 93-108.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8a9e6c132bd0486b843175ffdf5a740c,
title = "Alter-rights: Haiti and the Singularization of Universal Human Rights, 1804-2004",
abstract = "To rethink human rights when they have become little more than hollow ideology in the hands not only of nation-states but of the UN as well requires a radical change in perspective. This article will thus look back to one of the key moments in the history of human emancipation – the Haitian Revolution – to ask whether it might hold, in its unfulfilled potential, implications for overcoming the contemporary impasse of human rights discourse. Unlike the earlier French and US revolutions, which extended putatively ‘universal’ rights only to limited categories of citizens (typically white, adult, male property-holders) Haiti was alone in the early-modern world in its implementation of an unqualified, immediate ban on human slavery. For all its daring originality, however, the Haitian intervention never lived up to its historical promise. Both internal political divisions and the international pressure of contemporary slave-holding states such as France and the United States consistently undermined the Haitian initiative throughout the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. In the second part of this article, analysis of this historical process will lead me to consider the ways in which the works of Edwidge Danticat and Peter Hallward stand as contemporary interventions that remain faithful to this unfulfilled legacy of 1804.",
keywords = "Haitian revolution, Haiti, Toussaint Louverture, human rights, radical enlightenment, Robespierre",
author = "Nick Nesbitt",
year = "2009",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1386/ijfs.12.1.93_1",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "93--108",
journal = "International Journal of Francophone Studies",
issn = "1368-2679",
publisher = "Intellect Publishers",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Alter-rights

T2 - Haiti and the Singularization of Universal Human Rights, 1804-2004

AU - Nesbitt, Nick

PY - 2009/4/1

Y1 - 2009/4/1

N2 - To rethink human rights when they have become little more than hollow ideology in the hands not only of nation-states but of the UN as well requires a radical change in perspective. This article will thus look back to one of the key moments in the history of human emancipation – the Haitian Revolution – to ask whether it might hold, in its unfulfilled potential, implications for overcoming the contemporary impasse of human rights discourse. Unlike the earlier French and US revolutions, which extended putatively ‘universal’ rights only to limited categories of citizens (typically white, adult, male property-holders) Haiti was alone in the early-modern world in its implementation of an unqualified, immediate ban on human slavery. For all its daring originality, however, the Haitian intervention never lived up to its historical promise. Both internal political divisions and the international pressure of contemporary slave-holding states such as France and the United States consistently undermined the Haitian initiative throughout the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. In the second part of this article, analysis of this historical process will lead me to consider the ways in which the works of Edwidge Danticat and Peter Hallward stand as contemporary interventions that remain faithful to this unfulfilled legacy of 1804.

AB - To rethink human rights when they have become little more than hollow ideology in the hands not only of nation-states but of the UN as well requires a radical change in perspective. This article will thus look back to one of the key moments in the history of human emancipation – the Haitian Revolution – to ask whether it might hold, in its unfulfilled potential, implications for overcoming the contemporary impasse of human rights discourse. Unlike the earlier French and US revolutions, which extended putatively ‘universal’ rights only to limited categories of citizens (typically white, adult, male property-holders) Haiti was alone in the early-modern world in its implementation of an unqualified, immediate ban on human slavery. For all its daring originality, however, the Haitian intervention never lived up to its historical promise. Both internal political divisions and the international pressure of contemporary slave-holding states such as France and the United States consistently undermined the Haitian initiative throughout the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. In the second part of this article, analysis of this historical process will lead me to consider the ways in which the works of Edwidge Danticat and Peter Hallward stand as contemporary interventions that remain faithful to this unfulfilled legacy of 1804.

KW - Haitian revolution

KW - Haiti

KW - Toussaint Louverture

KW - human rights

KW - radical enlightenment

KW - Robespierre

U2 - 10.1386/ijfs.12.1.93_1

DO - 10.1386/ijfs.12.1.93_1

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 93

EP - 108

JO - International Journal of Francophone Studies

JF - International Journal of Francophone Studies

SN - 1368-2679

IS - 1

ER -