"Am I as extended as you say I am?" Consumers' emic perspectives on the extended self

Tim Stone, Stephen J Gould, Teodóra Szabó-Douat

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)
7 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Although the extended self construct (Belk, 1988) has been widely investigated in consumer research, it has inspired relatively few critiques. Moreover, there has been little research which directly assesses consumers’ own emic perspectives on the extended self. Here, an empirical investigation is reported which explicitly solicits consumers’ own ideas and hermeneutically considers them in relation to etic researcher theory. The findings indicate a major theoretical blind spot: not only do consumers differ in the polysemy, i.e., the various meanings and discourses they apply to the extended self, but also that marketing theory should be revised to reflect this lack of universal understanding.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)559-577
Number of pages19
JournalMarketing Theory
Volume17
Issue number4
Early online date24 May 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2017

Fingerprint

Consumer research
Discourse
Marketing theory
Empirical investigation

Keywords

  • extended self
  • critical marketing
  • empirical research
  • emic-etic
  • materiality
  • resistance
  • agency
  • naturalizing
  • polysemy

Cite this

"Am I as extended as you say I am?" Consumers' emic perspectives on the extended self. / Stone, Tim; Gould, Stephen J; Szabó-Douat, Teodóra .

In: Marketing Theory, Vol. 17, No. 4, 12.2017, p. 559-577.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Stone, Tim ; Gould, Stephen J ; Szabó-Douat, Teodóra . / "Am I as extended as you say I am?" Consumers' emic perspectives on the extended self. In: Marketing Theory. 2017 ; Vol. 17, No. 4. pp. 559-577.
@article{fc864500c41a4b938940503aadc26895,
title = "{"}Am I as extended as you say I am?{"} Consumers' emic perspectives on the extended self",
abstract = "Although the extended self construct (Belk, 1988) has been widely investigated in consumer research, it has inspired relatively few critiques. Moreover, there has been little research which directly assesses consumers’ own emic perspectives on the extended self. Here, an empirical investigation is reported which explicitly solicits consumers’ own ideas and hermeneutically considers them in relation to etic researcher theory. The findings indicate a major theoretical blind spot: not only do consumers differ in the polysemy, i.e., the various meanings and discourses they apply to the extended self, but also that marketing theory should be revised to reflect this lack of universal understanding.",
keywords = "extended self, critical marketing, empirical research, emic-etic, materiality, resistance, agency, naturalizing, polysemy",
author = "Tim Stone and Gould, {Stephen J} and Teod{\'o}ra Szab{\'o}-Douat",
note = "We would like to thank Pauline Maclaren (Editor) and each of the three reviewers of our work for their constructive comments and support throughout the review process. We would also like to thank Paula Gould and Grace Mackie for providing feedback on an earlier draft of this paper.",
year = "2017",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1177/1470593117708466",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "559--577",
journal = "Marketing Theory",
issn = "1470-5931",
publisher = "Sage Publications",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - "Am I as extended as you say I am?" Consumers' emic perspectives on the extended self

AU - Stone, Tim

AU - Gould, Stephen J

AU - Szabó-Douat, Teodóra

N1 - We would like to thank Pauline Maclaren (Editor) and each of the three reviewers of our work for their constructive comments and support throughout the review process. We would also like to thank Paula Gould and Grace Mackie for providing feedback on an earlier draft of this paper.

PY - 2017/12

Y1 - 2017/12

N2 - Although the extended self construct (Belk, 1988) has been widely investigated in consumer research, it has inspired relatively few critiques. Moreover, there has been little research which directly assesses consumers’ own emic perspectives on the extended self. Here, an empirical investigation is reported which explicitly solicits consumers’ own ideas and hermeneutically considers them in relation to etic researcher theory. The findings indicate a major theoretical blind spot: not only do consumers differ in the polysemy, i.e., the various meanings and discourses they apply to the extended self, but also that marketing theory should be revised to reflect this lack of universal understanding.

AB - Although the extended self construct (Belk, 1988) has been widely investigated in consumer research, it has inspired relatively few critiques. Moreover, there has been little research which directly assesses consumers’ own emic perspectives on the extended self. Here, an empirical investigation is reported which explicitly solicits consumers’ own ideas and hermeneutically considers them in relation to etic researcher theory. The findings indicate a major theoretical blind spot: not only do consumers differ in the polysemy, i.e., the various meanings and discourses they apply to the extended self, but also that marketing theory should be revised to reflect this lack of universal understanding.

KW - extended self

KW - critical marketing

KW - empirical research

KW - emic-etic

KW - materiality

KW - resistance

KW - agency

KW - naturalizing

KW - polysemy

U2 - 10.1177/1470593117708466

DO - 10.1177/1470593117708466

M3 - Article

VL - 17

SP - 559

EP - 577

JO - Marketing Theory

JF - Marketing Theory

SN - 1470-5931

IS - 4

ER -