Abstract
We study the interplay of the discourse structure of a scientic argument with formal citations. One subproblem of this is to classify academic citations in scientific articles according to their rhetorical function, e.g., as a rival approach, as a part of the solution, or as a flawed approach that justifies the current research. Here, we introduce our annotation scheme with 12 categories, and present an agreement study.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Proceedings of the 7th SIGdial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue |
Place of Publication | Sydney, Australia |
Publisher | ACL |
Pages | 80-87 |
Number of pages | 8 |
Publication status | Published - 2006 |
Event | 7th SIGdial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue - Sydney, Australia Duration: 1 Jul 2006 → 1 Jul 2006 |
Conference
Conference | 7th SIGdial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue |
---|---|
Country/Territory | Australia |
City | Sydney |
Period | 1/07/06 → 1/07/06 |