An argument-based approach to using multiple ontologies

Elizabeth Black, Anthony Hunter, Jeff Z. Pan

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Logic-based argumentation offers an approach to querying and revising multiple ontologies that are inconsistent or incoherent. A common assumption for logic-based argumentation is that an argument is a pair Φ,α where Φ is a minimal subset of the knowledgebase such that Φ is consistent and Φ entails the claim α. Using dialogue games, agents (each with its own ontology) can exchange arguments and counterarguments concerning formulae of interest. In this paper, we present a novel framework for logic-based argumentation with ontological knowledge. As far as we know, this is the first proposal for argumentation with multiple ontologies via dialogues. It allows two agents to discuss the answer to queries concerning their knowledge (even if it is inconsistent) without one agent having to copy all of their ontology to the other, and without the other agent having to expend time and effort merging that ontology with theirs. Furthermore, it offers the potential for the agents to incrementally improve their knowledge based on the dialogue by checking how it differs from the other agent's.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationScalable Uncertainty Management - Third International Conference, SUM 2009, Proceedings
EditorsLluís Godo, Andrea Pugliese
Pages68-79
Number of pages12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 4 Nov 2009
Event3rd International Conference on Scalable Uncertainty Management, SUM 2009 - Washington, DC, United States
Duration: 28 Sep 200930 Sep 2009

Publication series

NameLecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)
Volume5785 LNAI
ISSN (Print)0302-9743
ISSN (Electronic)1611-3349

Conference

Conference3rd International Conference on Scalable Uncertainty Management, SUM 2009
CountryUnited States
CityWashington, DC
Period28/09/0930/09/09

Fingerprint

Ontology
Argumentation
Logic
Inconsistent
Knowledge-based
Merging
Knowledge Base
Query
Game
Subset
Dialogue
Knowledge

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Theoretical Computer Science
  • Computer Science(all)

Cite this

Black, E., Hunter, A., & Pan, J. Z. (2009). An argument-based approach to using multiple ontologies. In L. Godo, & A. Pugliese (Eds.), Scalable Uncertainty Management - Third International Conference, SUM 2009, Proceedings (pp. 68-79). (Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics); Vol. 5785 LNAI). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04388-8_7

An argument-based approach to using multiple ontologies. / Black, Elizabeth; Hunter, Anthony; Pan, Jeff Z.

Scalable Uncertainty Management - Third International Conference, SUM 2009, Proceedings. ed. / Lluís Godo; Andrea Pugliese. 2009. p. 68-79 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics); Vol. 5785 LNAI).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Black, E, Hunter, A & Pan, JZ 2009, An argument-based approach to using multiple ontologies. in L Godo & A Pugliese (eds), Scalable Uncertainty Management - Third International Conference, SUM 2009, Proceedings. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), vol. 5785 LNAI, pp. 68-79, 3rd International Conference on Scalable Uncertainty Management, SUM 2009, Washington, DC, United States, 28/09/09. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04388-8_7
Black E, Hunter A, Pan JZ. An argument-based approach to using multiple ontologies. In Godo L, Pugliese A, editors, Scalable Uncertainty Management - Third International Conference, SUM 2009, Proceedings. 2009. p. 68-79. (Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04388-8_7
Black, Elizabeth ; Hunter, Anthony ; Pan, Jeff Z. / An argument-based approach to using multiple ontologies. Scalable Uncertainty Management - Third International Conference, SUM 2009, Proceedings. editor / Lluís Godo ; Andrea Pugliese. 2009. pp. 68-79 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)).
@inproceedings{c4bcd6fdfc494ea78af83c9e5eab1a2f,
title = "An argument-based approach to using multiple ontologies",
abstract = "Logic-based argumentation offers an approach to querying and revising multiple ontologies that are inconsistent or incoherent. A common assumption for logic-based argumentation is that an argument is a pair Φ,α where Φ is a minimal subset of the knowledgebase such that Φ is consistent and Φ entails the claim α. Using dialogue games, agents (each with its own ontology) can exchange arguments and counterarguments concerning formulae of interest. In this paper, we present a novel framework for logic-based argumentation with ontological knowledge. As far as we know, this is the first proposal for argumentation with multiple ontologies via dialogues. It allows two agents to discuss the answer to queries concerning their knowledge (even if it is inconsistent) without one agent having to copy all of their ontology to the other, and without the other agent having to expend time and effort merging that ontology with theirs. Furthermore, it offers the potential for the agents to incrementally improve their knowledge based on the dialogue by checking how it differs from the other agent's.",
author = "Elizabeth Black and Anthony Hunter and Pan, {Jeff Z.}",
year = "2009",
month = "11",
day = "4",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-642-04388-8_7",
language = "English",
isbn = "3642043879",
series = "Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)",
pages = "68--79",
editor = "Llu{\'i}s Godo and Pugliese, {Andrea }",
booktitle = "Scalable Uncertainty Management - Third International Conference, SUM 2009, Proceedings",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - An argument-based approach to using multiple ontologies

AU - Black, Elizabeth

AU - Hunter, Anthony

AU - Pan, Jeff Z.

PY - 2009/11/4

Y1 - 2009/11/4

N2 - Logic-based argumentation offers an approach to querying and revising multiple ontologies that are inconsistent or incoherent. A common assumption for logic-based argumentation is that an argument is a pair Φ,α where Φ is a minimal subset of the knowledgebase such that Φ is consistent and Φ entails the claim α. Using dialogue games, agents (each with its own ontology) can exchange arguments and counterarguments concerning formulae of interest. In this paper, we present a novel framework for logic-based argumentation with ontological knowledge. As far as we know, this is the first proposal for argumentation with multiple ontologies via dialogues. It allows two agents to discuss the answer to queries concerning their knowledge (even if it is inconsistent) without one agent having to copy all of their ontology to the other, and without the other agent having to expend time and effort merging that ontology with theirs. Furthermore, it offers the potential for the agents to incrementally improve their knowledge based on the dialogue by checking how it differs from the other agent's.

AB - Logic-based argumentation offers an approach to querying and revising multiple ontologies that are inconsistent or incoherent. A common assumption for logic-based argumentation is that an argument is a pair Φ,α where Φ is a minimal subset of the knowledgebase such that Φ is consistent and Φ entails the claim α. Using dialogue games, agents (each with its own ontology) can exchange arguments and counterarguments concerning formulae of interest. In this paper, we present a novel framework for logic-based argumentation with ontological knowledge. As far as we know, this is the first proposal for argumentation with multiple ontologies via dialogues. It allows two agents to discuss the answer to queries concerning their knowledge (even if it is inconsistent) without one agent having to copy all of their ontology to the other, and without the other agent having to expend time and effort merging that ontology with theirs. Furthermore, it offers the potential for the agents to incrementally improve their knowledge based on the dialogue by checking how it differs from the other agent's.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70350449414&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-642-04388-8_7

DO - 10.1007/978-3-642-04388-8_7

M3 - Conference contribution

SN - 3642043879

SN - 9783642043871

T3 - Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

SP - 68

EP - 79

BT - Scalable Uncertainty Management - Third International Conference, SUM 2009, Proceedings

A2 - Godo, Lluís

A2 - Pugliese, Andrea

ER -