An economic evaluation of NIOX MINO airway inflammation monitor in the United Kingdom

D Price, J Berg, P Lindgren

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FENO), a marker of eosinophilic airway inflammation, is easily measured by noninvasive means. The objective of this study was to determine the cost-effectiveness of FENO measurement using a hand-held monitor (NIOX MINO), at a reimbursement price of 23 pound sterling, for asthma diagnosis and management in the UK. METHODS: We constructed two decision trees to compare FENO measurement with standard diagnostic testing and guideline recommendations for management. For asthma diagnosis, we compared FENO measurement with lung function and reversibility testing, bronchial provocation and sputum eosinophil count. For asthma management, we evaluated the impact on asthma control, including inhaled corticosteroid use, exacerbations and hospitalizations, of monitoring with FENO measurement vs symptoms and lung function as in standard care. Resource use and health outcomes were evaluated over a 1-year time frame. Direct costs were calculated from a UK health-care payer perspective (2005 pound sterling). RESULTS: An asthma diagnosis using FENO measurement cost 43 pound sterling less per patient as compared with standard diagnostic tests. Asthma management using FENO measurement instead of lung function testing resulted in annual cost-savings of 341 pound sterling and 0.06 quality-adjusted life-years gained for patients with mild to severe asthma and cost-savings of 554 pound sterling and 0.004 quality-adjusted life-years gained for those with moderate to severe asthma. CONCLUSIONS: Asthma diagnosis based on FENO measurement with NIOX MINO alone is less costly and more accurate than standard diagnostic methods. Asthma management based on FENO measurement is less costly than asthma management based on standard guidelines and provides similar health benefits.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)431-438
Number of pages8
JournalAllergy
Volume64
Issue number3
Early online date31 Jan 2009
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2009

Fingerprint

Cost-Benefit Analysis
Asthma
Inflammation
Nitric Oxide
Quality-Adjusted Life Years
Cost Savings
Lung
United Kingdom
Guidelines
Costs and Cost Analysis
Decision Trees
Health Resources
Insurance Benefits
Sputum
Routine Diagnostic Tests
Eosinophils
Adrenal Cortex Hormones
Hospitalization
Hand
Delivery of Health Care

Keywords

  • asthma
  • cost-benefit analysis
  • diagnostic equipment
  • exhalation
  • Great Britain
  • humans
  • inflammation
  • lung
  • nitric oxide
  • quality-adjusted life years
  • sensitivity and specificity

Cite this

An economic evaluation of NIOX MINO airway inflammation monitor in the United Kingdom. / Price, D; Berg, J; Lindgren, P.

In: Allergy, Vol. 64, No. 3, 03.2009, p. 431-438.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Price, D ; Berg, J ; Lindgren, P. / An economic evaluation of NIOX MINO airway inflammation monitor in the United Kingdom. In: Allergy. 2009 ; Vol. 64, No. 3. pp. 431-438.
@article{6c31f31beee64ee78aa507a3bb719308,
title = "An economic evaluation of NIOX MINO airway inflammation monitor in the United Kingdom",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FENO), a marker of eosinophilic airway inflammation, is easily measured by noninvasive means. The objective of this study was to determine the cost-effectiveness of FENO measurement using a hand-held monitor (NIOX MINO), at a reimbursement price of 23 pound sterling, for asthma diagnosis and management in the UK. METHODS: We constructed two decision trees to compare FENO measurement with standard diagnostic testing and guideline recommendations for management. For asthma diagnosis, we compared FENO measurement with lung function and reversibility testing, bronchial provocation and sputum eosinophil count. For asthma management, we evaluated the impact on asthma control, including inhaled corticosteroid use, exacerbations and hospitalizations, of monitoring with FENO measurement vs symptoms and lung function as in standard care. Resource use and health outcomes were evaluated over a 1-year time frame. Direct costs were calculated from a UK health-care payer perspective (2005 pound sterling). RESULTS: An asthma diagnosis using FENO measurement cost 43 pound sterling less per patient as compared with standard diagnostic tests. Asthma management using FENO measurement instead of lung function testing resulted in annual cost-savings of 341 pound sterling and 0.06 quality-adjusted life-years gained for patients with mild to severe asthma and cost-savings of 554 pound sterling and 0.004 quality-adjusted life-years gained for those with moderate to severe asthma. CONCLUSIONS: Asthma diagnosis based on FENO measurement with NIOX MINO alone is less costly and more accurate than standard diagnostic methods. Asthma management based on FENO measurement is less costly than asthma management based on standard guidelines and provides similar health benefits.",
keywords = "asthma, cost-benefit analysis, diagnostic equipment, exhalation, Great Britain, humans, inflammation, lung, nitric oxide, quality-adjusted life years, sensitivity and specificity",
author = "D Price and J Berg and P Lindgren",
year = "2009",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1111/j.1398-9995.2008.01855.x",
language = "English",
volume = "64",
pages = "431--438",
journal = "Allergy",
issn = "0105-4538",
publisher = "John Wiley & Sons, Ltd (10.1111)",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An economic evaluation of NIOX MINO airway inflammation monitor in the United Kingdom

AU - Price, D

AU - Berg, J

AU - Lindgren, P

PY - 2009/3

Y1 - 2009/3

N2 - BACKGROUND: Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FENO), a marker of eosinophilic airway inflammation, is easily measured by noninvasive means. The objective of this study was to determine the cost-effectiveness of FENO measurement using a hand-held monitor (NIOX MINO), at a reimbursement price of 23 pound sterling, for asthma diagnosis and management in the UK. METHODS: We constructed two decision trees to compare FENO measurement with standard diagnostic testing and guideline recommendations for management. For asthma diagnosis, we compared FENO measurement with lung function and reversibility testing, bronchial provocation and sputum eosinophil count. For asthma management, we evaluated the impact on asthma control, including inhaled corticosteroid use, exacerbations and hospitalizations, of monitoring with FENO measurement vs symptoms and lung function as in standard care. Resource use and health outcomes were evaluated over a 1-year time frame. Direct costs were calculated from a UK health-care payer perspective (2005 pound sterling). RESULTS: An asthma diagnosis using FENO measurement cost 43 pound sterling less per patient as compared with standard diagnostic tests. Asthma management using FENO measurement instead of lung function testing resulted in annual cost-savings of 341 pound sterling and 0.06 quality-adjusted life-years gained for patients with mild to severe asthma and cost-savings of 554 pound sterling and 0.004 quality-adjusted life-years gained for those with moderate to severe asthma. CONCLUSIONS: Asthma diagnosis based on FENO measurement with NIOX MINO alone is less costly and more accurate than standard diagnostic methods. Asthma management based on FENO measurement is less costly than asthma management based on standard guidelines and provides similar health benefits.

AB - BACKGROUND: Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FENO), a marker of eosinophilic airway inflammation, is easily measured by noninvasive means. The objective of this study was to determine the cost-effectiveness of FENO measurement using a hand-held monitor (NIOX MINO), at a reimbursement price of 23 pound sterling, for asthma diagnosis and management in the UK. METHODS: We constructed two decision trees to compare FENO measurement with standard diagnostic testing and guideline recommendations for management. For asthma diagnosis, we compared FENO measurement with lung function and reversibility testing, bronchial provocation and sputum eosinophil count. For asthma management, we evaluated the impact on asthma control, including inhaled corticosteroid use, exacerbations and hospitalizations, of monitoring with FENO measurement vs symptoms and lung function as in standard care. Resource use and health outcomes were evaluated over a 1-year time frame. Direct costs were calculated from a UK health-care payer perspective (2005 pound sterling). RESULTS: An asthma diagnosis using FENO measurement cost 43 pound sterling less per patient as compared with standard diagnostic tests. Asthma management using FENO measurement instead of lung function testing resulted in annual cost-savings of 341 pound sterling and 0.06 quality-adjusted life-years gained for patients with mild to severe asthma and cost-savings of 554 pound sterling and 0.004 quality-adjusted life-years gained for those with moderate to severe asthma. CONCLUSIONS: Asthma diagnosis based on FENO measurement with NIOX MINO alone is less costly and more accurate than standard diagnostic methods. Asthma management based on FENO measurement is less costly than asthma management based on standard guidelines and provides similar health benefits.

KW - asthma

KW - cost-benefit analysis

KW - diagnostic equipment

KW - exhalation

KW - Great Britain

KW - humans

KW - inflammation

KW - lung

KW - nitric oxide

KW - quality-adjusted life years

KW - sensitivity and specificity

U2 - 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2008.01855.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2008.01855.x

M3 - Article

VL - 64

SP - 431

EP - 438

JO - Allergy

JF - Allergy

SN - 0105-4538

IS - 3

ER -