An evaluation of an intervention designed to improve the evidence-based supply of non-prescription medicines from community pharmacies

Karebor Ngwerume, Margaret Watson, Christine Bond, Alison Blenkinsopp

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to conduct the proof of concept study and to develop and evaluate an educational intervention that promotes the evidence-based supply of non-prescription medicines (NPMs).

METHOD: An educational intervention was delivered to pharmacy assistants and pharmacists in three pharmacies in England. The intervention included the provision of summaries of evidence for the treatment of four minor ailments and resulted in the preparation of evidence-based portfolios for the treatment of the following ailments: athlete's foot, cough, nasal congestion and period pain. The effect of the intervention was evaluated using a combination of direct overt observation, vignettes, self-reported behaviour and interviews.

KEY FINDINGS: Evaluation data were collected from the three pharmacies. Data were derived from 3 pharmacists and 13 assistants, of whom 10 (3 pharmacists; 7 assistants) attended the training event. Comparing pre- and post-intervention practice, 8/11 (pre-) versus 5/6 (post-) observed, 46/80 versus 62/80 vignette and 25/30 versus 39/40 self-reported recommendations were evidence based. Prior to the intervention, 3/16 participants understood the role of evidence regarding the supply of NPMs compared with 16/16 post-intervention. Participants reported relying upon experiential knowledge to inform their decision making prior to the educational intervention. Thereafter, the participants reported using evidence to a greater extent. Barriers and facilitators for evidence-based practice were also identified.

CONCLUSION: A one-off educational intervention increased participants' self-reported awareness and potential application of evidence to inform their supply of NPMs. Further research is needed to assess the effectiveness, long-term impact, generalisability and cost-effectiveness of this intervention for a wider range of common conditions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)102-110
Number of pages9
JournalInternational Journal of Pharmacy Practice
Volume23
Issue number2
Early online date20 May 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2015

Fingerprint

Pharmacies
Cost effectiveness
Pharmacists
Decision making
Tinea Pedis
Evidence-Based Practice
Nose
Cough
England
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Decision Making
Observation
Interviews
Pain
Therapeutics
Research

Keywords

  • community pharmacy
  • evidence-based practice
  • medicine counter assistants
  • non-prescription medicines

Cite this

An evaluation of an intervention designed to improve the evidence-based supply of non-prescription medicines from community pharmacies. / Ngwerume, Karebor; Watson, Margaret; Bond, Christine; Blenkinsopp, Alison.

In: International Journal of Pharmacy Practice, Vol. 23, No. 2, 04.2015, p. 102-110.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0b41f9297c31470880503cfed8ea730c,
title = "An evaluation of an intervention designed to improve the evidence-based supply of non-prescription medicines from community pharmacies",
abstract = "OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to conduct the proof of concept study and to develop and evaluate an educational intervention that promotes the evidence-based supply of non-prescription medicines (NPMs).METHOD: An educational intervention was delivered to pharmacy assistants and pharmacists in three pharmacies in England. The intervention included the provision of summaries of evidence for the treatment of four minor ailments and resulted in the preparation of evidence-based portfolios for the treatment of the following ailments: athlete's foot, cough, nasal congestion and period pain. The effect of the intervention was evaluated using a combination of direct overt observation, vignettes, self-reported behaviour and interviews.KEY FINDINGS: Evaluation data were collected from the three pharmacies. Data were derived from 3 pharmacists and 13 assistants, of whom 10 (3 pharmacists; 7 assistants) attended the training event. Comparing pre- and post-intervention practice, 8/11 (pre-) versus 5/6 (post-) observed, 46/80 versus 62/80 vignette and 25/30 versus 39/40 self-reported recommendations were evidence based. Prior to the intervention, 3/16 participants understood the role of evidence regarding the supply of NPMs compared with 16/16 post-intervention. Participants reported relying upon experiential knowledge to inform their decision making prior to the educational intervention. Thereafter, the participants reported using evidence to a greater extent. Barriers and facilitators for evidence-based practice were also identified.CONCLUSION: A one-off educational intervention increased participants' self-reported awareness and potential application of evidence to inform their supply of NPMs. Further research is needed to assess the effectiveness, long-term impact, generalisability and cost-effectiveness of this intervention for a wider range of common conditions.",
keywords = "community pharmacy, evidence-based practice, medicine counter assistants, non-prescription medicines",
author = "Karebor Ngwerume and Margaret Watson and Christine Bond and Alison Blenkinsopp",
note = "{\circledC} 2014 Royal Pharmaceutical Society. Funded by Pharmacy Practice Research Trust Hull Pharmacist Association The study is published as an MSc and was funded under a bursary from Pharmacy Practice Research Trust. The training event was funded using a grant from Hull Pharmacist Association. Acknowledgements We thank all pharmacists and staff who took part in this study.",
year = "2015",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1111/ijpp.12118",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "102--110",
journal = "International Journal of Pharmacy Practice",
issn = "0961-7671",
publisher = "John Wiley & Sons, Ltd (10.1111)",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An evaluation of an intervention designed to improve the evidence-based supply of non-prescription medicines from community pharmacies

AU - Ngwerume, Karebor

AU - Watson, Margaret

AU - Bond, Christine

AU - Blenkinsopp, Alison

N1 - © 2014 Royal Pharmaceutical Society. Funded by Pharmacy Practice Research Trust Hull Pharmacist Association The study is published as an MSc and was funded under a bursary from Pharmacy Practice Research Trust. The training event was funded using a grant from Hull Pharmacist Association. Acknowledgements We thank all pharmacists and staff who took part in this study.

PY - 2015/4

Y1 - 2015/4

N2 - OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to conduct the proof of concept study and to develop and evaluate an educational intervention that promotes the evidence-based supply of non-prescription medicines (NPMs).METHOD: An educational intervention was delivered to pharmacy assistants and pharmacists in three pharmacies in England. The intervention included the provision of summaries of evidence for the treatment of four minor ailments and resulted in the preparation of evidence-based portfolios for the treatment of the following ailments: athlete's foot, cough, nasal congestion and period pain. The effect of the intervention was evaluated using a combination of direct overt observation, vignettes, self-reported behaviour and interviews.KEY FINDINGS: Evaluation data were collected from the three pharmacies. Data were derived from 3 pharmacists and 13 assistants, of whom 10 (3 pharmacists; 7 assistants) attended the training event. Comparing pre- and post-intervention practice, 8/11 (pre-) versus 5/6 (post-) observed, 46/80 versus 62/80 vignette and 25/30 versus 39/40 self-reported recommendations were evidence based. Prior to the intervention, 3/16 participants understood the role of evidence regarding the supply of NPMs compared with 16/16 post-intervention. Participants reported relying upon experiential knowledge to inform their decision making prior to the educational intervention. Thereafter, the participants reported using evidence to a greater extent. Barriers and facilitators for evidence-based practice were also identified.CONCLUSION: A one-off educational intervention increased participants' self-reported awareness and potential application of evidence to inform their supply of NPMs. Further research is needed to assess the effectiveness, long-term impact, generalisability and cost-effectiveness of this intervention for a wider range of common conditions.

AB - OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to conduct the proof of concept study and to develop and evaluate an educational intervention that promotes the evidence-based supply of non-prescription medicines (NPMs).METHOD: An educational intervention was delivered to pharmacy assistants and pharmacists in three pharmacies in England. The intervention included the provision of summaries of evidence for the treatment of four minor ailments and resulted in the preparation of evidence-based portfolios for the treatment of the following ailments: athlete's foot, cough, nasal congestion and period pain. The effect of the intervention was evaluated using a combination of direct overt observation, vignettes, self-reported behaviour and interviews.KEY FINDINGS: Evaluation data were collected from the three pharmacies. Data were derived from 3 pharmacists and 13 assistants, of whom 10 (3 pharmacists; 7 assistants) attended the training event. Comparing pre- and post-intervention practice, 8/11 (pre-) versus 5/6 (post-) observed, 46/80 versus 62/80 vignette and 25/30 versus 39/40 self-reported recommendations were evidence based. Prior to the intervention, 3/16 participants understood the role of evidence regarding the supply of NPMs compared with 16/16 post-intervention. Participants reported relying upon experiential knowledge to inform their decision making prior to the educational intervention. Thereafter, the participants reported using evidence to a greater extent. Barriers and facilitators for evidence-based practice were also identified.CONCLUSION: A one-off educational intervention increased participants' self-reported awareness and potential application of evidence to inform their supply of NPMs. Further research is needed to assess the effectiveness, long-term impact, generalisability and cost-effectiveness of this intervention for a wider range of common conditions.

KW - community pharmacy

KW - evidence-based practice

KW - medicine counter assistants

KW - non-prescription medicines

U2 - 10.1111/ijpp.12118

DO - 10.1111/ijpp.12118

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 102

EP - 110

JO - International Journal of Pharmacy Practice

JF - International Journal of Pharmacy Practice

SN - 0961-7671

IS - 2

ER -