An evaluation of the use of shore-based surveys for estimating spatial overlap between deep-diving seabirds and tidal stream turbines

J. J. Waggitt*, P. S. Bell, B. E. Scott, Beth Emily Scott

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

As we approach the first array deployments of tidal stream turbines, the risk of collisions between moving components of devices and deep-diving seabirds need assessing at population levels. Part of assessing risks is quantifying the extent to which the foraging distributions of deep-diving seabirds overlap with the potential locations of devices in the large tidal pass habitats favoured for array installations (spatial overlap). Shore-based surveys using single vantage points and extensive grid systems to record the locations of foraging birds are often used in large tidal passes. Here, an application of these methods in the Fall of Warness (FOW), Orkney, UK are used to evaluate their effectiveness for quantifying and statistically analysing spatial overlap in large tidal passes. Whilst it was possible to quantify and statistically analyse spatial overlap using the methods evaluated here, viable statistical analysis required data sacrifices through the use of presence rather than abundance data. Moreover, comparisons between simultaneous shore-based and boat-based surveys, which are assumed to represent an accurate method, showed that sightings in the former were biased towards non-turbine microhabitats. This shore-based survey bias reflected low detection rates of foraging birds in fast unidirectional currents away from coastlines. Therefore, the methods evaluated here are unsuitable for quantifying and statistically analysing spatial overlap in large tidal passes. It is suggested that future shore-based surveys should overcome aforementioned issues by using several vantage points spread throughout large tidal passes, and comparing species use of neighbouring turbine and non-turbine microhabitats at reasonable distances to the vantage points (<2 km) during favourable sea states (Beaufort Scale < 3). It is hoped that these recommendations lead to the development of standardised shore-based survey methods, providing comparable measurements of spatial overlap across tidal passes earmarked for array deployments: a key step towards estimations of collision risks at population levels.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)36-49
Number of pages14
JournalInternational Journal of Marine Energy
Volume8
Early online date18 Oct 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2014

Fingerprint

diving
seabird
turbine
Turbines
microhabitat
Birds
collision
bird
sea state
survey method
Boats
statistical analysis
evaluation
method
coast
habitat

Keywords

  • Collision risks
  • Environmental assessment
  • Habitat use
  • Marine ecology
  • Survey method

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Mechanical Engineering
  • Ocean Engineering
  • Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
  • Environmental Engineering
  • Water Science and Technology

Cite this

An evaluation of the use of shore-based surveys for estimating spatial overlap between deep-diving seabirds and tidal stream turbines. / Waggitt, J. J.; Bell, P. S.; Scott, B. E.; Scott, Beth Emily.

In: International Journal of Marine Energy, Vol. 8, 12.2014, p. 36-49.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{63e56d13f2d04e1d8920965a22fe5c1f,
title = "An evaluation of the use of shore-based surveys for estimating spatial overlap between deep-diving seabirds and tidal stream turbines",
abstract = "As we approach the first array deployments of tidal stream turbines, the risk of collisions between moving components of devices and deep-diving seabirds need assessing at population levels. Part of assessing risks is quantifying the extent to which the foraging distributions of deep-diving seabirds overlap with the potential locations of devices in the large tidal pass habitats favoured for array installations (spatial overlap). Shore-based surveys using single vantage points and extensive grid systems to record the locations of foraging birds are often used in large tidal passes. Here, an application of these methods in the Fall of Warness (FOW), Orkney, UK are used to evaluate their effectiveness for quantifying and statistically analysing spatial overlap in large tidal passes. Whilst it was possible to quantify and statistically analyse spatial overlap using the methods evaluated here, viable statistical analysis required data sacrifices through the use of presence rather than abundance data. Moreover, comparisons between simultaneous shore-based and boat-based surveys, which are assumed to represent an accurate method, showed that sightings in the former were biased towards non-turbine microhabitats. This shore-based survey bias reflected low detection rates of foraging birds in fast unidirectional currents away from coastlines. Therefore, the methods evaluated here are unsuitable for quantifying and statistically analysing spatial overlap in large tidal passes. It is suggested that future shore-based surveys should overcome aforementioned issues by using several vantage points spread throughout large tidal passes, and comparing species use of neighbouring turbine and non-turbine microhabitats at reasonable distances to the vantage points (<2 km) during favourable sea states (Beaufort Scale < 3). It is hoped that these recommendations lead to the development of standardised shore-based survey methods, providing comparable measurements of spatial overlap across tidal passes earmarked for array deployments: a key step towards estimations of collision risks at population levels.",
keywords = "Collision risks, Environmental assessment, Habitat use, Marine ecology, Survey method",
author = "Waggitt, {J. J.} and Bell, {P. S.} and Scott, {B. E.} and Scott, {Beth Emily}",
note = "Boat-based surveys were funded by a NERC (NE/J004340/1) and a SNH grant. JJW is funded by a NERC Case studentship supported by OpenHydro Ltd. (NE/J500148/1). The deployment of the marine X-band radar was funded by a NERC grant (NE/J004332/1). Marine Scotland kindly provided vessel time on the MRV Alba-na-Mara.",
year = "2014",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijome.2014.10.004",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "36--49",
journal = "International Journal of Marine Energy",
issn = "2214-1669",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An evaluation of the use of shore-based surveys for estimating spatial overlap between deep-diving seabirds and tidal stream turbines

AU - Waggitt, J. J.

AU - Bell, P. S.

AU - Scott, B. E.

AU - Scott, Beth Emily

N1 - Boat-based surveys were funded by a NERC (NE/J004340/1) and a SNH grant. JJW is funded by a NERC Case studentship supported by OpenHydro Ltd. (NE/J500148/1). The deployment of the marine X-band radar was funded by a NERC grant (NE/J004332/1). Marine Scotland kindly provided vessel time on the MRV Alba-na-Mara.

PY - 2014/12

Y1 - 2014/12

N2 - As we approach the first array deployments of tidal stream turbines, the risk of collisions between moving components of devices and deep-diving seabirds need assessing at population levels. Part of assessing risks is quantifying the extent to which the foraging distributions of deep-diving seabirds overlap with the potential locations of devices in the large tidal pass habitats favoured for array installations (spatial overlap). Shore-based surveys using single vantage points and extensive grid systems to record the locations of foraging birds are often used in large tidal passes. Here, an application of these methods in the Fall of Warness (FOW), Orkney, UK are used to evaluate their effectiveness for quantifying and statistically analysing spatial overlap in large tidal passes. Whilst it was possible to quantify and statistically analyse spatial overlap using the methods evaluated here, viable statistical analysis required data sacrifices through the use of presence rather than abundance data. Moreover, comparisons between simultaneous shore-based and boat-based surveys, which are assumed to represent an accurate method, showed that sightings in the former were biased towards non-turbine microhabitats. This shore-based survey bias reflected low detection rates of foraging birds in fast unidirectional currents away from coastlines. Therefore, the methods evaluated here are unsuitable for quantifying and statistically analysing spatial overlap in large tidal passes. It is suggested that future shore-based surveys should overcome aforementioned issues by using several vantage points spread throughout large tidal passes, and comparing species use of neighbouring turbine and non-turbine microhabitats at reasonable distances to the vantage points (<2 km) during favourable sea states (Beaufort Scale < 3). It is hoped that these recommendations lead to the development of standardised shore-based survey methods, providing comparable measurements of spatial overlap across tidal passes earmarked for array deployments: a key step towards estimations of collision risks at population levels.

AB - As we approach the first array deployments of tidal stream turbines, the risk of collisions between moving components of devices and deep-diving seabirds need assessing at population levels. Part of assessing risks is quantifying the extent to which the foraging distributions of deep-diving seabirds overlap with the potential locations of devices in the large tidal pass habitats favoured for array installations (spatial overlap). Shore-based surveys using single vantage points and extensive grid systems to record the locations of foraging birds are often used in large tidal passes. Here, an application of these methods in the Fall of Warness (FOW), Orkney, UK are used to evaluate their effectiveness for quantifying and statistically analysing spatial overlap in large tidal passes. Whilst it was possible to quantify and statistically analyse spatial overlap using the methods evaluated here, viable statistical analysis required data sacrifices through the use of presence rather than abundance data. Moreover, comparisons between simultaneous shore-based and boat-based surveys, which are assumed to represent an accurate method, showed that sightings in the former were biased towards non-turbine microhabitats. This shore-based survey bias reflected low detection rates of foraging birds in fast unidirectional currents away from coastlines. Therefore, the methods evaluated here are unsuitable for quantifying and statistically analysing spatial overlap in large tidal passes. It is suggested that future shore-based surveys should overcome aforementioned issues by using several vantage points spread throughout large tidal passes, and comparing species use of neighbouring turbine and non-turbine microhabitats at reasonable distances to the vantage points (<2 km) during favourable sea states (Beaufort Scale < 3). It is hoped that these recommendations lead to the development of standardised shore-based survey methods, providing comparable measurements of spatial overlap across tidal passes earmarked for array deployments: a key step towards estimations of collision risks at population levels.

KW - Collision risks

KW - Environmental assessment

KW - Habitat use

KW - Marine ecology

KW - Survey method

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84912112353&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijome.2014.10.004

DO - 10.1016/j.ijome.2014.10.004

M3 - Article

VL - 8

SP - 36

EP - 49

JO - International Journal of Marine Energy

JF - International Journal of Marine Energy

SN - 2214-1669

ER -