An updated systematic review of epidemiological evidence on hormonal contraceptive methods and HIV acquisition in women

Chelsea B. Polis, Kathryn M. Curtis, Philip C Hannaford, Sharon J. Phillips, Tsungai Chipato, James N. Kiarie, Daniel J Westreich, Petrus S. Steyn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

94 Citations (Scopus)
6 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Objective and design: Some studies suggest that specific hormonal contraceptive methods [particularly depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA)] may increase women's HIV acquisition risk. We updated a systematic review to incorporate recent epidemiological data.

Methods: We searched for articles published between 15 January 2014 and 15 January 2016 and hand-searched reference lists. We identified longitudinal studies comparing users of a specific hormonal contraceptive method against either nonusers of hormonal contraception or users of another specific hormonal contraceptive method. We added newly identified studies to those in the previous review, assessed study quality, created forest plots to display results, and conducted a meta-analysis for data on DMPA versus non-use of hormonal contraception.

Results: We identified 10 new reports of which five were considered ‘unlikely to inform the primary question’. We focus on the other five reports, along with nine from the previous review, which were considered ‘informative but with important limitations’. The preponderance of data for oral contraceptive pills, injectable norethisterone enanthate, and levonorgestrel implants do not suggest an association with HIV acquisition, though data for implants are limited. The new, higher quality studies on DMPA (or nondisaggregated injectables), which had mixed results in terms of statistical significance, had hazard ratios between 1.2 and 1.7, consistent with our meta-analytic estimate for all higher quality studies of hazard ratio 1.4.

Conclusion: Although confounding in these observational data cannot be excluded, new information increases concerns about DMPA and HIV acquisition risk in women. If the association is causal, the magnitude of effect is likely hazard ratio 1.5 or less. Data for other hormonal contraceptive methods, including norethisterone enanthate, are largely reassuring.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2665–2683
Number of pages19
JournalAIDS
Volume30
Issue number17
Early online date5 Aug 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 13 Nov 2016

    Fingerprint

Keywords

  • contraceptive implants
  • depot medroxyprogesterone acetate
  • HIV acqisition
  • hormonal contraception
  • injectable contraception
  • norethisterone enanthate
  • oral contraception
  • systematic review

Cite this

Polis, C. B., Curtis, K. M., Hannaford, P. C., Phillips, S. J., Chipato, T., Kiarie, J. N., Westreich, D. J., & Steyn, P. S. (2016). An updated systematic review of epidemiological evidence on hormonal contraceptive methods and HIV acquisition in women. AIDS, 30(17), 2665–2683. https://doi.org/10.1097/QAD.0000000000001228