Anaesthesia care team improves outcomes in surgical patients compared with solo anaesthesiologist

An observational study

Philippe Dony, Laurence Seidel, Magali Pirson, Patrice Forget (Corresponding Author)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In anaesthesiology, little attention has been drawn to the role of anaesthesia nurses as support personnel on quality of care.

OBJECTIVES: To compare an anaesthesiologist alone (solo anaesthesiologist) with an anaesthesia care team (anaesthesiologist and anaesthesia nurse).

DESIGN: An observational study.

SETTING: A single centre study.

PARTICIPANTS: Anaesthesiologists and anaesthesia nurses.

INTERVENTION: Anaesthesia performed by solo anaesthesiologists compared with anaesthesia care teams.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: 30-day postoperative mortality and hospital length of stay. Propensity score matching was performed by logistic regression to adjust for baseline differences between the two groups and pairs of perfectly matched patients were formed.

RESULTS: Anaesthesia was performed by solo anaesthesiologists in 2832 patients and by an anaesthesia care team in 2842 patients. Matching with 2095 pairs of perfectly matched patients was formed. The two groups were comparable in respect of sex and duration of anaesthesia but differed notably for age, American Society of Anesthesiologists' physical status score and type of surgery. Logistic regression showed a significantly lower 30-day mortality rate for the anaesthesia care teams compared with solo anaesthesiologists (0.76 vs. 1.56%, P = 0.0014). Length of hospital stay was also significantly reduced when an anaesthesia nurse was present (4.9 ± 10.1 vs. 5.6 ± 11.5 days, P = 0.0011).

CONCLUSION: Anaesthesia given by teams of anaesthesiologists and anaesthesia nurses is associated with decreased 30-day postoperative mortality and shorter length of stay when compared with solo anaesthesiologists. Even without any demonstration of causality, this emphasises the benefits of the anaesthesia care team model.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: CCB 325201730849.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)64-69
Number of pages6
JournalEuropean journal of anaesthesiology
Volume36
Issue number1
Early online date9 Oct 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2019

Fingerprint

Observational Studies
Anesthesia
Length of Stay
Nurses
Mortality
Logistic Models
Propensity Score
Patient Care Team
Anesthesiology
Nurse's Role
Quality of Health Care
Causality

Cite this

Anaesthesia care team improves outcomes in surgical patients compared with solo anaesthesiologist : An observational study. / Dony, Philippe; Seidel, Laurence; Pirson, Magali; Forget, Patrice (Corresponding Author).

In: European journal of anaesthesiology, Vol. 36, No. 1, 01.2019, p. 64-69.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6f49e4aee7894017a9fa46f1af72979b,
title = "Anaesthesia care team improves outcomes in surgical patients compared with solo anaesthesiologist: An observational study",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: In anaesthesiology, little attention has been drawn to the role of anaesthesia nurses as support personnel on quality of care.OBJECTIVES: To compare an anaesthesiologist alone (solo anaesthesiologist) with an anaesthesia care team (anaesthesiologist and anaesthesia nurse).DESIGN: An observational study.SETTING: A single centre study.PARTICIPANTS: Anaesthesiologists and anaesthesia nurses.INTERVENTION: Anaesthesia performed by solo anaesthesiologists compared with anaesthesia care teams.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: 30-day postoperative mortality and hospital length of stay. Propensity score matching was performed by logistic regression to adjust for baseline differences between the two groups and pairs of perfectly matched patients were formed.RESULTS: Anaesthesia was performed by solo anaesthesiologists in 2832 patients and by an anaesthesia care team in 2842 patients. Matching with 2095 pairs of perfectly matched patients was formed. The two groups were comparable in respect of sex and duration of anaesthesia but differed notably for age, American Society of Anesthesiologists' physical status score and type of surgery. Logistic regression showed a significantly lower 30-day mortality rate for the anaesthesia care teams compared with solo anaesthesiologists (0.76 vs. 1.56{\%}, P = 0.0014). Length of hospital stay was also significantly reduced when an anaesthesia nurse was present (4.9 ± 10.1 vs. 5.6 ± 11.5 days, P = 0.0011).CONCLUSION: Anaesthesia given by teams of anaesthesiologists and anaesthesia nurses is associated with decreased 30-day postoperative mortality and shorter length of stay when compared with solo anaesthesiologists. Even without any demonstration of causality, this emphasises the benefits of the anaesthesia care team model.TRIAL REGISTRATION: CCB 325201730849.",
author = "Philippe Dony and Laurence Seidel and Magali Pirson and Patrice Forget",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1097/EJA.0000000000000891",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "64--69",
journal = "European journal of anaesthesiology",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Anaesthesia care team improves outcomes in surgical patients compared with solo anaesthesiologist

T2 - An observational study

AU - Dony, Philippe

AU - Seidel, Laurence

AU - Pirson, Magali

AU - Forget, Patrice

PY - 2019/1

Y1 - 2019/1

N2 - BACKGROUND: In anaesthesiology, little attention has been drawn to the role of anaesthesia nurses as support personnel on quality of care.OBJECTIVES: To compare an anaesthesiologist alone (solo anaesthesiologist) with an anaesthesia care team (anaesthesiologist and anaesthesia nurse).DESIGN: An observational study.SETTING: A single centre study.PARTICIPANTS: Anaesthesiologists and anaesthesia nurses.INTERVENTION: Anaesthesia performed by solo anaesthesiologists compared with anaesthesia care teams.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: 30-day postoperative mortality and hospital length of stay. Propensity score matching was performed by logistic regression to adjust for baseline differences between the two groups and pairs of perfectly matched patients were formed.RESULTS: Anaesthesia was performed by solo anaesthesiologists in 2832 patients and by an anaesthesia care team in 2842 patients. Matching with 2095 pairs of perfectly matched patients was formed. The two groups were comparable in respect of sex and duration of anaesthesia but differed notably for age, American Society of Anesthesiologists' physical status score and type of surgery. Logistic regression showed a significantly lower 30-day mortality rate for the anaesthesia care teams compared with solo anaesthesiologists (0.76 vs. 1.56%, P = 0.0014). Length of hospital stay was also significantly reduced when an anaesthesia nurse was present (4.9 ± 10.1 vs. 5.6 ± 11.5 days, P = 0.0011).CONCLUSION: Anaesthesia given by teams of anaesthesiologists and anaesthesia nurses is associated with decreased 30-day postoperative mortality and shorter length of stay when compared with solo anaesthesiologists. Even without any demonstration of causality, this emphasises the benefits of the anaesthesia care team model.TRIAL REGISTRATION: CCB 325201730849.

AB - BACKGROUND: In anaesthesiology, little attention has been drawn to the role of anaesthesia nurses as support personnel on quality of care.OBJECTIVES: To compare an anaesthesiologist alone (solo anaesthesiologist) with an anaesthesia care team (anaesthesiologist and anaesthesia nurse).DESIGN: An observational study.SETTING: A single centre study.PARTICIPANTS: Anaesthesiologists and anaesthesia nurses.INTERVENTION: Anaesthesia performed by solo anaesthesiologists compared with anaesthesia care teams.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: 30-day postoperative mortality and hospital length of stay. Propensity score matching was performed by logistic regression to adjust for baseline differences between the two groups and pairs of perfectly matched patients were formed.RESULTS: Anaesthesia was performed by solo anaesthesiologists in 2832 patients and by an anaesthesia care team in 2842 patients. Matching with 2095 pairs of perfectly matched patients was formed. The two groups were comparable in respect of sex and duration of anaesthesia but differed notably for age, American Society of Anesthesiologists' physical status score and type of surgery. Logistic regression showed a significantly lower 30-day mortality rate for the anaesthesia care teams compared with solo anaesthesiologists (0.76 vs. 1.56%, P = 0.0014). Length of hospital stay was also significantly reduced when an anaesthesia nurse was present (4.9 ± 10.1 vs. 5.6 ± 11.5 days, P = 0.0011).CONCLUSION: Anaesthesia given by teams of anaesthesiologists and anaesthesia nurses is associated with decreased 30-day postoperative mortality and shorter length of stay when compared with solo anaesthesiologists. Even without any demonstration of causality, this emphasises the benefits of the anaesthesia care team model.TRIAL REGISTRATION: CCB 325201730849.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-85067241791&partnerID=MN8TOARS

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/anaesthesia-care-team-improves-outcomes-surgical-patients-compared-solo-anaesthesiologist-observatio

U2 - 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000891

DO - 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000891

M3 - Article

VL - 36

SP - 64

EP - 69

JO - European journal of anaesthesiology

JF - European journal of anaesthesiology

IS - 1

ER -