Analysing the process of compulsory acquisition of land through the lens of procedural fairness

Jyoti Rao*, Norman Hutchison, Piyush Tiwari

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    Compulsory acquisition of land is contested bitterly by affected landowners for various reasons including fairness in the compensation that is offered to landowners and fairness in the process that is followed in land acquisition by acquiring authorities. While there is a volume of research that has focussed on compensation, there is a paucity of literature analysing fairness in the process of land acquisition.

    This paper examines fairness in land acquisition using the case of Scotland, which is currently in the process of reforming laws and policies governing the compulsory acquisition of land. A primary survey was undertaken with stakeholders involved in a road project and information was analysed using ‘qualitative content analysis’.

    This research identifies the gaps in the existing process of compulsory acquisition using the theoretical lens of ‘procedural justice’ with a strong focus on the social psychology dimension and argues for the incorporation of basic principles of ‘procedural justice’. Fifteen major procedural gaps were identified, which include weak decision-making power of the members of the public in the identification and design of public projects; inadequate representation of objectors due to the high personal cost associated with representation in a public inquiry; time delays; information asymmetries and inefficient grievance management.
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalJournal of Property Research
    Publication statusAccepted/In press - 7 Jan 2020

    Fingerprint

    fairness
    landowner
    justice
    social psychology
    asymmetry
    content analysis
    stakeholder
    decision making
    land
    road
    Law
    costs
    management
    cost
    project
    public

    Cite this

    Analysing the process of compulsory acquisition of land through the lens of procedural fairness. / Rao, Jyoti; Hutchison, Norman; Tiwari, Piyush.

    In: Journal of Property Research, 07.01.2020.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    @article{0573e97725e54e8ab737a276adc23f28,
    title = "Analysing the process of compulsory acquisition of land through the lens of procedural fairness",
    abstract = "Compulsory acquisition of land is contested bitterly by affected landowners for various reasons including fairness in the compensation that is offered to landowners and fairness in the process that is followed in land acquisition by acquiring authorities. While there is a volume of research that has focussed on compensation, there is a paucity of literature analysing fairness in the process of land acquisition.This paper examines fairness in land acquisition using the case of Scotland, which is currently in the process of reforming laws and policies governing the compulsory acquisition of land. A primary survey was undertaken with stakeholders involved in a road project and information was analysed using ‘qualitative content analysis’.This research identifies the gaps in the existing process of compulsory acquisition using the theoretical lens of ‘procedural justice’ with a strong focus on the social psychology dimension and argues for the incorporation of basic principles of ‘procedural justice’. Fifteen major procedural gaps were identified, which include weak decision-making power of the members of the public in the identification and design of public projects; inadequate representation of objectors due to the high personal cost associated with representation in a public inquiry; time delays; information asymmetries and inefficient grievance management.",
    author = "Jyoti Rao and Norman Hutchison and Piyush Tiwari",
    note = "Acknowledgement: The authors would like to thank the many contributions to this research and the helpful comments from the anonymous reviewers.",
    year = "2020",
    month = "1",
    day = "7",
    language = "English",
    journal = "Journal of Property Research",
    issn = "0959-9916",
    publisher = "Routledge",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Analysing the process of compulsory acquisition of land through the lens of procedural fairness

    AU - Rao, Jyoti

    AU - Hutchison, Norman

    AU - Tiwari, Piyush

    N1 - Acknowledgement: The authors would like to thank the many contributions to this research and the helpful comments from the anonymous reviewers.

    PY - 2020/1/7

    Y1 - 2020/1/7

    N2 - Compulsory acquisition of land is contested bitterly by affected landowners for various reasons including fairness in the compensation that is offered to landowners and fairness in the process that is followed in land acquisition by acquiring authorities. While there is a volume of research that has focussed on compensation, there is a paucity of literature analysing fairness in the process of land acquisition.This paper examines fairness in land acquisition using the case of Scotland, which is currently in the process of reforming laws and policies governing the compulsory acquisition of land. A primary survey was undertaken with stakeholders involved in a road project and information was analysed using ‘qualitative content analysis’.This research identifies the gaps in the existing process of compulsory acquisition using the theoretical lens of ‘procedural justice’ with a strong focus on the social psychology dimension and argues for the incorporation of basic principles of ‘procedural justice’. Fifteen major procedural gaps were identified, which include weak decision-making power of the members of the public in the identification and design of public projects; inadequate representation of objectors due to the high personal cost associated with representation in a public inquiry; time delays; information asymmetries and inefficient grievance management.

    AB - Compulsory acquisition of land is contested bitterly by affected landowners for various reasons including fairness in the compensation that is offered to landowners and fairness in the process that is followed in land acquisition by acquiring authorities. While there is a volume of research that has focussed on compensation, there is a paucity of literature analysing fairness in the process of land acquisition.This paper examines fairness in land acquisition using the case of Scotland, which is currently in the process of reforming laws and policies governing the compulsory acquisition of land. A primary survey was undertaken with stakeholders involved in a road project and information was analysed using ‘qualitative content analysis’.This research identifies the gaps in the existing process of compulsory acquisition using the theoretical lens of ‘procedural justice’ with a strong focus on the social psychology dimension and argues for the incorporation of basic principles of ‘procedural justice’. Fifteen major procedural gaps were identified, which include weak decision-making power of the members of the public in the identification and design of public projects; inadequate representation of objectors due to the high personal cost associated with representation in a public inquiry; time delays; information asymmetries and inefficient grievance management.

    M3 - Article

    JO - Journal of Property Research

    JF - Journal of Property Research

    SN - 0959-9916

    ER -