Analysis of barotactic and chemotactic guidance cues on directional decision-making of Dictyostelium discoideum cells in confined environments

Yuri Belotti, David McGloin, Cornelis J. Weijer*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Neutrophils and dendritic cells when migrating in confined environments have been shown to actuate a directional choice toward paths of least hydraulic resistance (barotaxis), in some cases overriding chemotactic responses. Here, we investigate whether this barotactic response is conserved in the more primitive model organism Dictyostelium discoideum using a microfluidic chip design. This design allowed us to monitor the behavior of single cells via live imaging when confronted with bifurcating microchannels, presenting different combinations of hydraulic and chemical stimuli. Under the conditions employed we find no evidence in support of a barotactic response; the cells base their directional choices on the chemotactic cues. When the cells are confronted by a microchannel bifurcation, they often split their leading edge and start moving into both channels, before a decision is made to move into one and retract from the other channel. Analysis of this decisionmaking process has shown that cells in steeper nonhydrolyzable adenosine- 3', 5'- cyclic monophosphorothioate, Sp- isomer (cAMPS) gradients move faster and split more readily. Furthermore, there exists a highly significant strong correlation between the velocity of the pseudopod moving up the cAMPS gradient to the total velocity of the pseudopods moving up and down the gradient over a large range of velocities. This suggests a role for a critical cortical tension gradient in the directional decision-making process.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)25553-25559
Number of pages7
JournalProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Volume117
Issue number41
Early online date30 Sept 2020
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 13 Oct 2020

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
We thank Gail Singer for help with the Dictyostelium strain generation and culture and Steven Neale (University of Glasgow), Michael MacDonald, Paul Campbell, Serenella Tolomeo, and Philip Murray (University of Dundee) for helpful discussions and constructive comments. The microfabrication of the microfluidic devices was carried out in the cleanroom facility at the Division of Physics of the University of Dundee. This work was supported a PhD studentship of the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council and Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council Grant BB/L00271X/1 to C.J.W.

Funding Information:
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS. We thank Gail Singer for help with the Dictyostelium strain generation and culture and Steven Neale (University of Glasgow), Michael MacDonald, Paul Campbell, Serenella Tolomeo, and Philip Murray (University of Dundee) for helpful discussions and constructive comments. The microfabrication of the microfluidic devices was carried out in the clean-room facility at the Division of Physics of the University of Dundee. This work was supported a PhD studentship of the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council and Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council Grant BB/L00271X/1 to C.J.W.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.

Data Availability Statement

All study data are included in the paper and SI Appendix. Selected time-lapse image sequences of the hundreds of experiments performed are included as Movies S1–S6. Raw image data will be made available upon request.

Keywords

  • Barotaxis
  • Cell migration
  • Chemotaxis
  • Microfluidics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Analysis of barotactic and chemotactic guidance cues on directional decision-making of Dictyostelium discoideum cells in confined environments'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this