Anti-Episcopacy and graphic satire in England, 1640-1645

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article examines the role of graphic satire as a tool of agitation and criticism during the early 1640s, taking as its case study the treatment of the archbishop of Canterbury and his episcopal associates at the hands of engravers, etchers, and pamphlet illustrators. Previous research into the political ephemera of early modern England has been inclined to sideline its pictorial aspects in favour of predominantly textual material, employing engravings and woodcuts in a merely illustrative capacity. Similarly, studies into the contemporary relationship between art, politics, and power have marginalized certain forms of visual medial, in particular the engravings and woodcuts which commonly constitute, graphic satire, focusing instead on elite displays of authority and promoting the concept of a distinct dichotomy between 'high' and 'low' culture and their consumers. It is argued here that the pictorial, and in particular graphic, arts formed an integral part of a wider culture of propaganda and critique during this period, incorporating drama, satire, reportage, and verse, manipulating and appropriating ideas and imagery familiar to a diverse audience. It is further proposed that such a culture was both in its own time and at present only fully understood and appreciated when consumed and considered in these interdisciplinary terms.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)809-848
Number of pages40
JournalThe Historical Journal
Volume47
Issue number4
Early online date29 Nov 2004
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2004

Fingerprint

England
Episcopacy
Satire
Engraving
Woodcut
Archbishop of Canterbury
Ephemera
Propaganda
Drama
1640s
Pamphlets
Graphic Arts
Elites
Imagery
Low Culture
Art and Politics
Associates
Early Modern England
Criticism
Verse

Keywords

  • Early Stuart England
  • censorship

Cite this

Anti-Episcopacy and graphic satire in England, 1640-1645. / Pierce, Helen Suzanne.

In: The Historical Journal, Vol. 47, No. 4, 12.2004, p. 809-848.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f31dbf1a242045af872660d23d3db106,
title = "Anti-Episcopacy and graphic satire in England, 1640-1645",
abstract = "This article examines the role of graphic satire as a tool of agitation and criticism during the early 1640s, taking as its case study the treatment of the archbishop of Canterbury and his episcopal associates at the hands of engravers, etchers, and pamphlet illustrators. Previous research into the political ephemera of early modern England has been inclined to sideline its pictorial aspects in favour of predominantly textual material, employing engravings and woodcuts in a merely illustrative capacity. Similarly, studies into the contemporary relationship between art, politics, and power have marginalized certain forms of visual medial, in particular the engravings and woodcuts which commonly constitute, graphic satire, focusing instead on elite displays of authority and promoting the concept of a distinct dichotomy between 'high' and 'low' culture and their consumers. It is argued here that the pictorial, and in particular graphic, arts formed an integral part of a wider culture of propaganda and critique during this period, incorporating drama, satire, reportage, and verse, manipulating and appropriating ideas and imagery familiar to a diverse audience. It is further proposed that such a culture was both in its own time and at present only fully understood and appreciated when consumed and considered in these interdisciplinary terms.",
keywords = "Early Stuart England, censorship",
author = "Pierce, {Helen Suzanne}",
year = "2004",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1017/S0018246X04004017",
language = "English",
volume = "47",
pages = "809--848",
journal = "The Historical Journal",
issn = "0018-246X",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Anti-Episcopacy and graphic satire in England, 1640-1645

AU - Pierce, Helen Suzanne

PY - 2004/12

Y1 - 2004/12

N2 - This article examines the role of graphic satire as a tool of agitation and criticism during the early 1640s, taking as its case study the treatment of the archbishop of Canterbury and his episcopal associates at the hands of engravers, etchers, and pamphlet illustrators. Previous research into the political ephemera of early modern England has been inclined to sideline its pictorial aspects in favour of predominantly textual material, employing engravings and woodcuts in a merely illustrative capacity. Similarly, studies into the contemporary relationship between art, politics, and power have marginalized certain forms of visual medial, in particular the engravings and woodcuts which commonly constitute, graphic satire, focusing instead on elite displays of authority and promoting the concept of a distinct dichotomy between 'high' and 'low' culture and their consumers. It is argued here that the pictorial, and in particular graphic, arts formed an integral part of a wider culture of propaganda and critique during this period, incorporating drama, satire, reportage, and verse, manipulating and appropriating ideas and imagery familiar to a diverse audience. It is further proposed that such a culture was both in its own time and at present only fully understood and appreciated when consumed and considered in these interdisciplinary terms.

AB - This article examines the role of graphic satire as a tool of agitation and criticism during the early 1640s, taking as its case study the treatment of the archbishop of Canterbury and his episcopal associates at the hands of engravers, etchers, and pamphlet illustrators. Previous research into the political ephemera of early modern England has been inclined to sideline its pictorial aspects in favour of predominantly textual material, employing engravings and woodcuts in a merely illustrative capacity. Similarly, studies into the contemporary relationship between art, politics, and power have marginalized certain forms of visual medial, in particular the engravings and woodcuts which commonly constitute, graphic satire, focusing instead on elite displays of authority and promoting the concept of a distinct dichotomy between 'high' and 'low' culture and their consumers. It is argued here that the pictorial, and in particular graphic, arts formed an integral part of a wider culture of propaganda and critique during this period, incorporating drama, satire, reportage, and verse, manipulating and appropriating ideas and imagery familiar to a diverse audience. It is further proposed that such a culture was both in its own time and at present only fully understood and appreciated when consumed and considered in these interdisciplinary terms.

KW - Early Stuart England

KW - censorship

U2 - 10.1017/S0018246X04004017

DO - 10.1017/S0018246X04004017

M3 - Article

VL - 47

SP - 809

EP - 848

JO - The Historical Journal

JF - The Historical Journal

SN - 0018-246X

IS - 4

ER -