Anticipating vulnerability to climate change in dryland pastoral systems: using dynamic systems models for the Kalahari

Andrew J. Dougill, Evan D. G. Fraser, Mark Reed

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

69 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

It is vitally important to identify agroecosystems that may cease functioning because of changing climate or land degradation. However, identifying such systems is confounded on both conceptual and methodological grounds, especially in systems that are moving toward thresholds, a common trait of dryland environments. This study explores these challenges by analyzing how a range of external pressures affect the vulnerability of dryland pastoral systems in the Kalahari. This is achieved by employing dynamic systems modeling approaches to understand the pathways by which communities became vulnerable to drought. Specifically, we evaluate how external pressures have changed: (1) different agroecosystems' abilities to tolerate drought, i.e., ecosystem resilience; (2) rural communities' abilities to adapt to drought, mediated via their access to assets; and (3) the ability of institutions and policy interventions to play a role in mediating drought-related crises, i.e., socio-political governance. This is done by reanalyzing ecological and participatory research findings along with farm-scale livestock offtake data from across the Kalahari in Botswana. An iterative process was followed to establish narratives exploring how external drivers led to changes in agroecosystem resilience, access to assets, and the institutional capacity to buffer the system. We use "causal loop diagrams" and statistical dynamic system models to express key quantitative relationships and establish future scenarios to help define where uncertainties lie by showing where the system is most sensitive to change. We highlight how that greater sharing of land management knowledge and practices between private and communal land managers can provide 'win-win-win' benefits of reducing system vulnerability, increasing economic income, and building social capital. We use future scenario analyses to identify key areas for future studies of climate change adaptation across the Kalahari.

Original languageEnglish
Article number17
Number of pages20
JournalEcology and Society
Volume15
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 2010

Keywords

  • Botswana
  • climate change
  • drought sensitivity
  • dynamic systems modelling
  • Kalahari
  • pastoral farming
  • vulnerability pathways
  • environmental-change
  • Southern Africa
  • degradation assessment
  • vegetation dynamics
  • land degradation
  • food systems
  • rangelands
  • Namibia
  • perceptions

Cite this

Anticipating vulnerability to climate change in dryland pastoral systems : using dynamic systems models for the Kalahari. / Dougill, Andrew J.; Fraser, Evan D. G.; Reed, Mark.

In: Ecology and Society, Vol. 15, No. 2, 17, 2010.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7e0ceb98cfa045d48494b50f0caf1e52,
title = "Anticipating vulnerability to climate change in dryland pastoral systems: using dynamic systems models for the Kalahari",
abstract = "It is vitally important to identify agroecosystems that may cease functioning because of changing climate or land degradation. However, identifying such systems is confounded on both conceptual and methodological grounds, especially in systems that are moving toward thresholds, a common trait of dryland environments. This study explores these challenges by analyzing how a range of external pressures affect the vulnerability of dryland pastoral systems in the Kalahari. This is achieved by employing dynamic systems modeling approaches to understand the pathways by which communities became vulnerable to drought. Specifically, we evaluate how external pressures have changed: (1) different agroecosystems' abilities to tolerate drought, i.e., ecosystem resilience; (2) rural communities' abilities to adapt to drought, mediated via their access to assets; and (3) the ability of institutions and policy interventions to play a role in mediating drought-related crises, i.e., socio-political governance. This is done by reanalyzing ecological and participatory research findings along with farm-scale livestock offtake data from across the Kalahari in Botswana. An iterative process was followed to establish narratives exploring how external drivers led to changes in agroecosystem resilience, access to assets, and the institutional capacity to buffer the system. We use {"}causal loop diagrams{"} and statistical dynamic system models to express key quantitative relationships and establish future scenarios to help define where uncertainties lie by showing where the system is most sensitive to change. We highlight how that greater sharing of land management knowledge and practices between private and communal land managers can provide 'win-win-win' benefits of reducing system vulnerability, increasing economic income, and building social capital. We use future scenario analyses to identify key areas for future studies of climate change adaptation across the Kalahari.",
keywords = "Botswana, climate change, drought sensitivity, dynamic systems modelling, Kalahari, pastoral farming, vulnerability pathways, environmental-change, Southern Africa, degradation assessment, vegetation dynamics, land degradation, food systems, rangelands, Namibia, perceptions",
author = "Dougill, {Andrew J.} and Fraser, {Evan D. G.} and Mark Reed",
year = "2010",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
journal = "Ecology and Society",
issn = "1708-3087",
publisher = "The Resilience Alliance",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Anticipating vulnerability to climate change in dryland pastoral systems

T2 - using dynamic systems models for the Kalahari

AU - Dougill, Andrew J.

AU - Fraser, Evan D. G.

AU - Reed, Mark

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - It is vitally important to identify agroecosystems that may cease functioning because of changing climate or land degradation. However, identifying such systems is confounded on both conceptual and methodological grounds, especially in systems that are moving toward thresholds, a common trait of dryland environments. This study explores these challenges by analyzing how a range of external pressures affect the vulnerability of dryland pastoral systems in the Kalahari. This is achieved by employing dynamic systems modeling approaches to understand the pathways by which communities became vulnerable to drought. Specifically, we evaluate how external pressures have changed: (1) different agroecosystems' abilities to tolerate drought, i.e., ecosystem resilience; (2) rural communities' abilities to adapt to drought, mediated via their access to assets; and (3) the ability of institutions and policy interventions to play a role in mediating drought-related crises, i.e., socio-political governance. This is done by reanalyzing ecological and participatory research findings along with farm-scale livestock offtake data from across the Kalahari in Botswana. An iterative process was followed to establish narratives exploring how external drivers led to changes in agroecosystem resilience, access to assets, and the institutional capacity to buffer the system. We use "causal loop diagrams" and statistical dynamic system models to express key quantitative relationships and establish future scenarios to help define where uncertainties lie by showing where the system is most sensitive to change. We highlight how that greater sharing of land management knowledge and practices between private and communal land managers can provide 'win-win-win' benefits of reducing system vulnerability, increasing economic income, and building social capital. We use future scenario analyses to identify key areas for future studies of climate change adaptation across the Kalahari.

AB - It is vitally important to identify agroecosystems that may cease functioning because of changing climate or land degradation. However, identifying such systems is confounded on both conceptual and methodological grounds, especially in systems that are moving toward thresholds, a common trait of dryland environments. This study explores these challenges by analyzing how a range of external pressures affect the vulnerability of dryland pastoral systems in the Kalahari. This is achieved by employing dynamic systems modeling approaches to understand the pathways by which communities became vulnerable to drought. Specifically, we evaluate how external pressures have changed: (1) different agroecosystems' abilities to tolerate drought, i.e., ecosystem resilience; (2) rural communities' abilities to adapt to drought, mediated via their access to assets; and (3) the ability of institutions and policy interventions to play a role in mediating drought-related crises, i.e., socio-political governance. This is done by reanalyzing ecological and participatory research findings along with farm-scale livestock offtake data from across the Kalahari in Botswana. An iterative process was followed to establish narratives exploring how external drivers led to changes in agroecosystem resilience, access to assets, and the institutional capacity to buffer the system. We use "causal loop diagrams" and statistical dynamic system models to express key quantitative relationships and establish future scenarios to help define where uncertainties lie by showing where the system is most sensitive to change. We highlight how that greater sharing of land management knowledge and practices between private and communal land managers can provide 'win-win-win' benefits of reducing system vulnerability, increasing economic income, and building social capital. We use future scenario analyses to identify key areas for future studies of climate change adaptation across the Kalahari.

KW - Botswana

KW - climate change

KW - drought sensitivity

KW - dynamic systems modelling

KW - Kalahari

KW - pastoral farming

KW - vulnerability pathways

KW - environmental-change

KW - Southern Africa

KW - degradation assessment

KW - vegetation dynamics

KW - land degradation

KW - food systems

KW - rangelands

KW - Namibia

KW - perceptions

M3 - Article

VL - 15

JO - Ecology and Society

JF - Ecology and Society

SN - 1708-3087

IS - 2

M1 - 17

ER -