Anxiety and depression in breast cancer patients at low risk of recurrence compared with the general population: A valid comparison?

Mogens Groenvold*, Peter M. Fayers, Mirjam A.G. Sprangers, Jakob B. Bjorner, Marianne C. Klee, Neil K. Aaronson, Per Bech, Henning T. Mouridsen

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

77 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Breast cancer and its treatment have been associated with psychological morbidity. In this study our aim was to quantify the excess anxiety and depression resulting from breast cancer. We compared 538 newly diagnosed breast cancer patients at low risk of recurrence (87.0% responded) to 872 women randomly selected from the Danish general population (69.7% responded) using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Contrary to expectations, the proportions classified as 'cases' of anxiety and depression were not significantly different in the two groups. The breast cancer patients' mean HADS scores were significantly lower than those in the general population sample (anxiety, P = 0.021; depression, P < 0.001), indicating less anxiety and depression. However, we question the validity of this comparison. The HADS may not be suitable for use in the general population and there may be methodological problems in comparisons of groups whose life situations are very different. Copyright (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Inc.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)523-530
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume52
Issue number6
Early online date18 Jun 1999
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 1999

Fingerprint

Anxiety
Depression
Breast Neoplasms
Recurrence
Population
Psychology
Morbidity

Keywords

  • Anxiety
  • Assessment
  • Bias
  • Breast cancer
  • Depression
  • Research design

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology

Cite this

Anxiety and depression in breast cancer patients at low risk of recurrence compared with the general population : A valid comparison? / Groenvold, Mogens; Fayers, Peter M.; Sprangers, Mirjam A.G.; Bjorner, Jakob B.; Klee, Marianne C.; Aaronson, Neil K.; Bech, Per; Mouridsen, Henning T.

In: Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Vol. 52, No. 6, 06.1999, p. 523-530.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Groenvold, Mogens ; Fayers, Peter M. ; Sprangers, Mirjam A.G. ; Bjorner, Jakob B. ; Klee, Marianne C. ; Aaronson, Neil K. ; Bech, Per ; Mouridsen, Henning T. / Anxiety and depression in breast cancer patients at low risk of recurrence compared with the general population : A valid comparison?. In: Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 1999 ; Vol. 52, No. 6. pp. 523-530.
@article{28296bed959c47dca1af4e66cc54d51f,
title = "Anxiety and depression in breast cancer patients at low risk of recurrence compared with the general population: A valid comparison?",
abstract = "Breast cancer and its treatment have been associated with psychological morbidity. In this study our aim was to quantify the excess anxiety and depression resulting from breast cancer. We compared 538 newly diagnosed breast cancer patients at low risk of recurrence (87.0{\%} responded) to 872 women randomly selected from the Danish general population (69.7{\%} responded) using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Contrary to expectations, the proportions classified as 'cases' of anxiety and depression were not significantly different in the two groups. The breast cancer patients' mean HADS scores were significantly lower than those in the general population sample (anxiety, P = 0.021; depression, P < 0.001), indicating less anxiety and depression. However, we question the validity of this comparison. The HADS may not be suitable for use in the general population and there may be methodological problems in comparisons of groups whose life situations are very different. Copyright (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Inc.",
keywords = "Anxiety, Assessment, Bias, Breast cancer, Depression, Research design",
author = "Mogens Groenvold and Fayers, {Peter M.} and Sprangers, {Mirjam A.G.} and Bjorner, {Jakob B.} and Klee, {Marianne C.} and Aaronson, {Neil K.} and Per Bech and Mouridsen, {Henning T.}",
year = "1999",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1016/S0895-4356(99)00022-0",
language = "English",
volume = "52",
pages = "523--530",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Epidemiology",
issn = "0895-4356",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Anxiety and depression in breast cancer patients at low risk of recurrence compared with the general population

T2 - A valid comparison?

AU - Groenvold, Mogens

AU - Fayers, Peter M.

AU - Sprangers, Mirjam A.G.

AU - Bjorner, Jakob B.

AU - Klee, Marianne C.

AU - Aaronson, Neil K.

AU - Bech, Per

AU - Mouridsen, Henning T.

PY - 1999/6

Y1 - 1999/6

N2 - Breast cancer and its treatment have been associated with psychological morbidity. In this study our aim was to quantify the excess anxiety and depression resulting from breast cancer. We compared 538 newly diagnosed breast cancer patients at low risk of recurrence (87.0% responded) to 872 women randomly selected from the Danish general population (69.7% responded) using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Contrary to expectations, the proportions classified as 'cases' of anxiety and depression were not significantly different in the two groups. The breast cancer patients' mean HADS scores were significantly lower than those in the general population sample (anxiety, P = 0.021; depression, P < 0.001), indicating less anxiety and depression. However, we question the validity of this comparison. The HADS may not be suitable for use in the general population and there may be methodological problems in comparisons of groups whose life situations are very different. Copyright (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Inc.

AB - Breast cancer and its treatment have been associated with psychological morbidity. In this study our aim was to quantify the excess anxiety and depression resulting from breast cancer. We compared 538 newly diagnosed breast cancer patients at low risk of recurrence (87.0% responded) to 872 women randomly selected from the Danish general population (69.7% responded) using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Contrary to expectations, the proportions classified as 'cases' of anxiety and depression were not significantly different in the two groups. The breast cancer patients' mean HADS scores were significantly lower than those in the general population sample (anxiety, P = 0.021; depression, P < 0.001), indicating less anxiety and depression. However, we question the validity of this comparison. The HADS may not be suitable for use in the general population and there may be methodological problems in comparisons of groups whose life situations are very different. Copyright (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Inc.

KW - Anxiety

KW - Assessment

KW - Bias

KW - Breast cancer

KW - Depression

KW - Research design

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033151652&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0895-4356(99)00022-0

DO - 10.1016/S0895-4356(99)00022-0

M3 - Article

C2 - 10408991

AN - SCOPUS:0033151652

VL - 52

SP - 523

EP - 530

JO - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

JF - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

SN - 0895-4356

IS - 6

ER -