Applicability of thin or thick skinned structural models in a region of multiple inversion episodes: southern South Africa

Douglas A. Paton, David I. M. Macdonald, John R. Underhill

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

32 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The deformation of the Cape Fold Belt has been attributed to repeated structural reactivation of a mega-detachment from the late Proterozoic to the Mesozoic (650-65 Ma). Through the integration of onshore cross-sections with observations from the offshore Mesozoic extensional system this study evaluates the applicability of the mega-detachment model.

Regional scale cross-sections through the Permian-Triassic Cape Fold Belt reveal that it comprises two main structural domains: a northern domain dominated by northward verging and asymmetric folds; and a southern domain comprising a series of approximately 8 km wavelength box folds. The genesis of these box folds is attributed to motion on underlying high angle (> 45 degrees) reverse faults. This variation between north and south in the fold belt is reflected by a similar variation in extensional geometry of the Mesozoic normal faults, as revealed by subsurface data. The normal faults demonstrate a progressive increase in dip from 24 in the north to 60 in the south.

Features commonly attributed to thin- and thick-skinned tectonic models are observed in both domains, therefore it is not appropriate to describe the observed deformation as one of the two end members. In addition, the structures are inferred to have undergone at least two stages of inversion, irrespective of dip. This is not predicted by either end-member model. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1933-1947
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Structural Geology
Volume28
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2006

Keywords

  • thin-skinned tectonics
  • thick-skinned tectonics
  • fault reactivation
  • structural inversion South Africa
  • Cape fold belt
  • fault propagation folds
  • balanced cross sections
  • Karoo basin
  • thrust
  • evolution
  • reactivation
  • geometry
  • tectonics
  • crust

Cite this

Applicability of thin or thick skinned structural models in a region of multiple inversion episodes : southern South Africa. / Paton, Douglas A.; Macdonald, David I. M.; Underhill, John R.

In: Journal of Structural Geology, Vol. 28, No. 11, 11.2006, p. 1933-1947.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Paton, Douglas A. ; Macdonald, David I. M. ; Underhill, John R. / Applicability of thin or thick skinned structural models in a region of multiple inversion episodes : southern South Africa. In: Journal of Structural Geology. 2006 ; Vol. 28, No. 11. pp. 1933-1947.
@article{cc4312d1cc4b47a8924ea81d367f6589,
title = "Applicability of thin or thick skinned structural models in a region of multiple inversion episodes: southern South Africa",
abstract = "The deformation of the Cape Fold Belt has been attributed to repeated structural reactivation of a mega-detachment from the late Proterozoic to the Mesozoic (650-65 Ma). Through the integration of onshore cross-sections with observations from the offshore Mesozoic extensional system this study evaluates the applicability of the mega-detachment model.Regional scale cross-sections through the Permian-Triassic Cape Fold Belt reveal that it comprises two main structural domains: a northern domain dominated by northward verging and asymmetric folds; and a southern domain comprising a series of approximately 8 km wavelength box folds. The genesis of these box folds is attributed to motion on underlying high angle (> 45 degrees) reverse faults. This variation between north and south in the fold belt is reflected by a similar variation in extensional geometry of the Mesozoic normal faults, as revealed by subsurface data. The normal faults demonstrate a progressive increase in dip from 24 in the north to 60 in the south.Features commonly attributed to thin- and thick-skinned tectonic models are observed in both domains, therefore it is not appropriate to describe the observed deformation as one of the two end members. In addition, the structures are inferred to have undergone at least two stages of inversion, irrespective of dip. This is not predicted by either end-member model. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.",
keywords = "thin-skinned tectonics, thick-skinned tectonics, fault reactivation, structural inversion South Africa, Cape fold belt, fault propagation folds, balanced cross sections, Karoo basin, thrust, evolution, reactivation, geometry, tectonics, crust",
author = "Paton, {Douglas A.} and Macdonald, {David I. M.} and Underhill, {John R.}",
note = "Acknowledgements DP was funded by a Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) Industrial CASE studentship with partners CASP, and CASP are also thanked for covering the cost of fieldwork. DP would like to thank Peter McFadzean for his assistance in the field. We also gratefully acknowledge Petroleum Agency South Africa for access to 2D seismic and well data and in particular David Broad and Ian McLachlan for facilitating data release and support of the project. Two anonymous reviewers are thanked for their constructive comments and helpful reviews. We are very grateful to Midland Valley for providing the 2D Move software license. The University of Edinburgh's seismic interpretation facilities, using Schlumberger GeoQuest IESX software, were funded by the Centre for Marine and Petroleum Technology, Esso, Norsk Hydro and Shell. Computing support was provided by James Jarvis and Chris Place.",
year = "2006",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1016/j.jsg.2006.07.002",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "1933--1947",
journal = "Journal of Structural Geology",
issn = "0191-8141",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Applicability of thin or thick skinned structural models in a region of multiple inversion episodes

T2 - southern South Africa

AU - Paton, Douglas A.

AU - Macdonald, David I. M.

AU - Underhill, John R.

N1 - Acknowledgements DP was funded by a Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) Industrial CASE studentship with partners CASP, and CASP are also thanked for covering the cost of fieldwork. DP would like to thank Peter McFadzean for his assistance in the field. We also gratefully acknowledge Petroleum Agency South Africa for access to 2D seismic and well data and in particular David Broad and Ian McLachlan for facilitating data release and support of the project. Two anonymous reviewers are thanked for their constructive comments and helpful reviews. We are very grateful to Midland Valley for providing the 2D Move software license. The University of Edinburgh's seismic interpretation facilities, using Schlumberger GeoQuest IESX software, were funded by the Centre for Marine and Petroleum Technology, Esso, Norsk Hydro and Shell. Computing support was provided by James Jarvis and Chris Place.

PY - 2006/11

Y1 - 2006/11

N2 - The deformation of the Cape Fold Belt has been attributed to repeated structural reactivation of a mega-detachment from the late Proterozoic to the Mesozoic (650-65 Ma). Through the integration of onshore cross-sections with observations from the offshore Mesozoic extensional system this study evaluates the applicability of the mega-detachment model.Regional scale cross-sections through the Permian-Triassic Cape Fold Belt reveal that it comprises two main structural domains: a northern domain dominated by northward verging and asymmetric folds; and a southern domain comprising a series of approximately 8 km wavelength box folds. The genesis of these box folds is attributed to motion on underlying high angle (> 45 degrees) reverse faults. This variation between north and south in the fold belt is reflected by a similar variation in extensional geometry of the Mesozoic normal faults, as revealed by subsurface data. The normal faults demonstrate a progressive increase in dip from 24 in the north to 60 in the south.Features commonly attributed to thin- and thick-skinned tectonic models are observed in both domains, therefore it is not appropriate to describe the observed deformation as one of the two end members. In addition, the structures are inferred to have undergone at least two stages of inversion, irrespective of dip. This is not predicted by either end-member model. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

AB - The deformation of the Cape Fold Belt has been attributed to repeated structural reactivation of a mega-detachment from the late Proterozoic to the Mesozoic (650-65 Ma). Through the integration of onshore cross-sections with observations from the offshore Mesozoic extensional system this study evaluates the applicability of the mega-detachment model.Regional scale cross-sections through the Permian-Triassic Cape Fold Belt reveal that it comprises two main structural domains: a northern domain dominated by northward verging and asymmetric folds; and a southern domain comprising a series of approximately 8 km wavelength box folds. The genesis of these box folds is attributed to motion on underlying high angle (> 45 degrees) reverse faults. This variation between north and south in the fold belt is reflected by a similar variation in extensional geometry of the Mesozoic normal faults, as revealed by subsurface data. The normal faults demonstrate a progressive increase in dip from 24 in the north to 60 in the south.Features commonly attributed to thin- and thick-skinned tectonic models are observed in both domains, therefore it is not appropriate to describe the observed deformation as one of the two end members. In addition, the structures are inferred to have undergone at least two stages of inversion, irrespective of dip. This is not predicted by either end-member model. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

KW - thin-skinned tectonics

KW - thick-skinned tectonics

KW - fault reactivation

KW - structural inversion South Africa

KW - Cape fold belt

KW - fault propagation folds

KW - balanced cross sections

KW - Karoo basin

KW - thrust

KW - evolution

KW - reactivation

KW - geometry

KW - tectonics

KW - crust

U2 - 10.1016/j.jsg.2006.07.002

DO - 10.1016/j.jsg.2006.07.002

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 1933

EP - 1947

JO - Journal of Structural Geology

JF - Journal of Structural Geology

SN - 0191-8141

IS - 11

ER -