Application of theory to enhance audit and feedback interventions to increase the uptake of evidence-based transfusion practice

an intervention development protocol

Natalie J Gould, Fabiana Lorencatto, Simon J Stanworth, Susan Michie, Maria E Prior, Liz Glidewell, Jeremy M Grimshaw, Jill J Francis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)
3 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Audits of blood transfusion demonstrate around 20% transfusions are outside national recommendations and guidelines. Audit and feedback is a widely used quality improvement intervention but effects on clinical practice are variable, suggesting potential for enhancement. Behavioural theory, theoretical frameworks of behaviour change and behaviour change techniques provide systematic processes to enhance intervention. This study is part of a larger programme of work to promote the uptake of evidence-based transfusion practice.

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study are to design two theoretically enhanced audit and feedback interventions; one focused on content and one on delivery, and investigate the feasibility and acceptability.

METHODS: Study A (Content): A coding framework based on current evidence regarding audit and feedback, and behaviour change theory and frameworks will be developed and applied as part of a structured content analysis to specify the key components of existing feedback documents. Prototype feedback documents with enhanced content and also a protocol, describing principles for enhancing feedback content, will be developed. Study B (Delivery): Individual semi-structured interviews with healthcare professionals and observations of team meetings in four hospitals will be used to specify, and identify views about, current audit and feedback practice. Interviews will be based on a topic guide developed using the Theoretical Domains Framework and the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Analysis of transcripts based on these frameworks will form the evidence base for developing a protocol describing an enhanced intervention that focuses on feedback delivery. Study C (Feasibility and Acceptability): Enhanced interventions will be piloted in four hospitals. Semi-structured interviews, questionnaires and observations will be used to assess feasibility and acceptability.

DISCUSSION: This intervention development work reflects the UK Medical Research Council's guidance on development of complex interventions, which emphasises the importance of a robust theoretical basis for intervention design and recommends systematic assessment of feasibility and acceptability prior to taking interventions to evaluation in a full-scale randomised study. The work-up includes specification of current practice so that, in the trials to be conducted later in this programme, there will be a clear distinction between the control (usual practice) conditions and the interventions to be evaluated.

Original languageEnglish
Article number92
JournalImplementation Science
Volume9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 29 Jul 2014

Fingerprint

Evidence-Based Practice
Interviews
Feasibility Studies
Quality Improvement
Blood Transfusion
Biomedical Research
Guidelines
Delivery of Health Care
Research

Keywords

  • Blood Transfusion
  • Diffusion of Innovation
  • Evidence-Based Medicine
  • Feedback
  • Great Britain
  • Guideline Adherence
  • Humans
  • Interviews as Topic
  • Medical Audit
  • Physician's Practice Patterns

Cite this

Application of theory to enhance audit and feedback interventions to increase the uptake of evidence-based transfusion practice : an intervention development protocol. / Gould, Natalie J; Lorencatto, Fabiana; Stanworth, Simon J; Michie, Susan; Prior, Maria E; Glidewell, Liz; Grimshaw, Jeremy M; Francis, Jill J.

In: Implementation Science, Vol. 9, 92, 29.07.2014.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gould, Natalie J ; Lorencatto, Fabiana ; Stanworth, Simon J ; Michie, Susan ; Prior, Maria E ; Glidewell, Liz ; Grimshaw, Jeremy M ; Francis, Jill J. / Application of theory to enhance audit and feedback interventions to increase the uptake of evidence-based transfusion practice : an intervention development protocol. In: Implementation Science. 2014 ; Vol. 9.
@article{fc335f6cb4684d918bd924cc6046bcb0,
title = "Application of theory to enhance audit and feedback interventions to increase the uptake of evidence-based transfusion practice: an intervention development protocol",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Audits of blood transfusion demonstrate around 20{\%} transfusions are outside national recommendations and guidelines. Audit and feedback is a widely used quality improvement intervention but effects on clinical practice are variable, suggesting potential for enhancement. Behavioural theory, theoretical frameworks of behaviour change and behaviour change techniques provide systematic processes to enhance intervention. This study is part of a larger programme of work to promote the uptake of evidence-based transfusion practice.OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study are to design two theoretically enhanced audit and feedback interventions; one focused on content and one on delivery, and investigate the feasibility and acceptability.METHODS: Study A (Content): A coding framework based on current evidence regarding audit and feedback, and behaviour change theory and frameworks will be developed and applied as part of a structured content analysis to specify the key components of existing feedback documents. Prototype feedback documents with enhanced content and also a protocol, describing principles for enhancing feedback content, will be developed. Study B (Delivery): Individual semi-structured interviews with healthcare professionals and observations of team meetings in four hospitals will be used to specify, and identify views about, current audit and feedback practice. Interviews will be based on a topic guide developed using the Theoretical Domains Framework and the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Analysis of transcripts based on these frameworks will form the evidence base for developing a protocol describing an enhanced intervention that focuses on feedback delivery. Study C (Feasibility and Acceptability): Enhanced interventions will be piloted in four hospitals. Semi-structured interviews, questionnaires and observations will be used to assess feasibility and acceptability.DISCUSSION: This intervention development work reflects the UK Medical Research Council's guidance on development of complex interventions, which emphasises the importance of a robust theoretical basis for intervention design and recommends systematic assessment of feasibility and acceptability prior to taking interventions to evaluation in a full-scale randomised study. The work-up includes specification of current practice so that, in the trials to be conducted later in this programme, there will be a clear distinction between the control (usual practice) conditions and the interventions to be evaluated.",
keywords = "Blood Transfusion, Diffusion of Innovation, Evidence-Based Medicine, Feedback, Great Britain, Guideline Adherence, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Medical Audit, Physician's Practice Patterns",
author = "Gould, {Natalie J} and Fabiana Lorencatto and Stanworth, {Simon J} and Susan Michie and Prior, {Maria E} and Liz Glidewell and Grimshaw, {Jeremy M} and Francis, {Jill J}",
year = "2014",
month = "7",
day = "29",
doi = "10.1186/s13012-014-0092-1",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
journal = "Implementation Science",
issn = "1748-5908",
publisher = "BioMed Central",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Application of theory to enhance audit and feedback interventions to increase the uptake of evidence-based transfusion practice

T2 - an intervention development protocol

AU - Gould, Natalie J

AU - Lorencatto, Fabiana

AU - Stanworth, Simon J

AU - Michie, Susan

AU - Prior, Maria E

AU - Glidewell, Liz

AU - Grimshaw, Jeremy M

AU - Francis, Jill J

PY - 2014/7/29

Y1 - 2014/7/29

N2 - BACKGROUND: Audits of blood transfusion demonstrate around 20% transfusions are outside national recommendations and guidelines. Audit and feedback is a widely used quality improvement intervention but effects on clinical practice are variable, suggesting potential for enhancement. Behavioural theory, theoretical frameworks of behaviour change and behaviour change techniques provide systematic processes to enhance intervention. This study is part of a larger programme of work to promote the uptake of evidence-based transfusion practice.OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study are to design two theoretically enhanced audit and feedback interventions; one focused on content and one on delivery, and investigate the feasibility and acceptability.METHODS: Study A (Content): A coding framework based on current evidence regarding audit and feedback, and behaviour change theory and frameworks will be developed and applied as part of a structured content analysis to specify the key components of existing feedback documents. Prototype feedback documents with enhanced content and also a protocol, describing principles for enhancing feedback content, will be developed. Study B (Delivery): Individual semi-structured interviews with healthcare professionals and observations of team meetings in four hospitals will be used to specify, and identify views about, current audit and feedback practice. Interviews will be based on a topic guide developed using the Theoretical Domains Framework and the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Analysis of transcripts based on these frameworks will form the evidence base for developing a protocol describing an enhanced intervention that focuses on feedback delivery. Study C (Feasibility and Acceptability): Enhanced interventions will be piloted in four hospitals. Semi-structured interviews, questionnaires and observations will be used to assess feasibility and acceptability.DISCUSSION: This intervention development work reflects the UK Medical Research Council's guidance on development of complex interventions, which emphasises the importance of a robust theoretical basis for intervention design and recommends systematic assessment of feasibility and acceptability prior to taking interventions to evaluation in a full-scale randomised study. The work-up includes specification of current practice so that, in the trials to be conducted later in this programme, there will be a clear distinction between the control (usual practice) conditions and the interventions to be evaluated.

AB - BACKGROUND: Audits of blood transfusion demonstrate around 20% transfusions are outside national recommendations and guidelines. Audit and feedback is a widely used quality improvement intervention but effects on clinical practice are variable, suggesting potential for enhancement. Behavioural theory, theoretical frameworks of behaviour change and behaviour change techniques provide systematic processes to enhance intervention. This study is part of a larger programme of work to promote the uptake of evidence-based transfusion practice.OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study are to design two theoretically enhanced audit and feedback interventions; one focused on content and one on delivery, and investigate the feasibility and acceptability.METHODS: Study A (Content): A coding framework based on current evidence regarding audit and feedback, and behaviour change theory and frameworks will be developed and applied as part of a structured content analysis to specify the key components of existing feedback documents. Prototype feedback documents with enhanced content and also a protocol, describing principles for enhancing feedback content, will be developed. Study B (Delivery): Individual semi-structured interviews with healthcare professionals and observations of team meetings in four hospitals will be used to specify, and identify views about, current audit and feedback practice. Interviews will be based on a topic guide developed using the Theoretical Domains Framework and the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Analysis of transcripts based on these frameworks will form the evidence base for developing a protocol describing an enhanced intervention that focuses on feedback delivery. Study C (Feasibility and Acceptability): Enhanced interventions will be piloted in four hospitals. Semi-structured interviews, questionnaires and observations will be used to assess feasibility and acceptability.DISCUSSION: This intervention development work reflects the UK Medical Research Council's guidance on development of complex interventions, which emphasises the importance of a robust theoretical basis for intervention design and recommends systematic assessment of feasibility and acceptability prior to taking interventions to evaluation in a full-scale randomised study. The work-up includes specification of current practice so that, in the trials to be conducted later in this programme, there will be a clear distinction between the control (usual practice) conditions and the interventions to be evaluated.

KW - Blood Transfusion

KW - Diffusion of Innovation

KW - Evidence-Based Medicine

KW - Feedback

KW - Great Britain

KW - Guideline Adherence

KW - Humans

KW - Interviews as Topic

KW - Medical Audit

KW - Physician's Practice Patterns

U2 - 10.1186/s13012-014-0092-1

DO - 10.1186/s13012-014-0092-1

M3 - Article

VL - 9

JO - Implementation Science

JF - Implementation Science

SN - 1748-5908

M1 - 92

ER -