Arable plant communities as indicators of farming practice

C. Hawes*, G. R. Squire, P. D. Hallett, C.A. Watson, M. Young

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

66 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The diversity and abundance of the within-field seedbank and emerged weed flora, were measured in over 100 fields from conventional, integrated and organic farms across the arable east of Scotland. Both seedbank and emerged flora showed significant responses to a management intensity gradient from farms with high agrochemical inputs and winter cropping to those with no inorganic inputs, spring cropping and mixed farming practices. The emerged weed flora was more affected by recent agrochemical inputs than was the seedbank, which is buffered by the persistence of weed seeds in the soil. The seedbank was more strongly influenced by soil characteristics, such as % organic carbon and % total nitrogen, than by management. Overall farming approach (categorised here as organic, integrated and conventional) appeared to exert a selection pressure on the species composition of the seedbank, building up different communities under the three farming approaches over time. These effects were scale dependent. At a within-field scale, species richness was greatest in organic farms where there was a greater abundance of weeds. At a regional and landscape scale, species richness was greater in integrated and conventional farms. This was particularly evident in integrated farms which represented a greater range of crop types and cropping practices between fields than either conventional of organic farms alone. Increasing the diversity of cropping practices between fields may offer a complementary approach to reducing agrochemical inputs for enhancing arable biodiversity across landscapes. (C) 2010 Published by Elsevier B.V.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)17-26
Number of pages10
JournalAgriculture Ecosystems & Environment
Volume138
Issue number1-2
Early online date22 Apr 2010
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Jun 2010

Keywords

  • systems
  • weed diversity
  • biodiversity indicators
  • conventional agriculture
  • integrated management
  • weed seeds
  • biodiversity
  • diversity
  • organic farming
  • soil
  • seedbank
  • land-use
  • herbicide-tolerant crops
  • abundance
  • scale evaluations

Cite this

Arable plant communities as indicators of farming practice. / Hawes, C.; Squire, G. R.; Hallett, P. D.; Watson, C.A.; Young, M.

In: Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, Vol. 138, No. 1-2, 15.06.2010, p. 17-26.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hawes, C. ; Squire, G. R. ; Hallett, P. D. ; Watson, C.A. ; Young, M. / Arable plant communities as indicators of farming practice. In: Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment. 2010 ; Vol. 138, No. 1-2. pp. 17-26.
@article{f5e5ec9c6dab42ba96ce2207f0c5a29d,
title = "Arable plant communities as indicators of farming practice",
abstract = "The diversity and abundance of the within-field seedbank and emerged weed flora, were measured in over 100 fields from conventional, integrated and organic farms across the arable east of Scotland. Both seedbank and emerged flora showed significant responses to a management intensity gradient from farms with high agrochemical inputs and winter cropping to those with no inorganic inputs, spring cropping and mixed farming practices. The emerged weed flora was more affected by recent agrochemical inputs than was the seedbank, which is buffered by the persistence of weed seeds in the soil. The seedbank was more strongly influenced by soil characteristics, such as {\%} organic carbon and {\%} total nitrogen, than by management. Overall farming approach (categorised here as organic, integrated and conventional) appeared to exert a selection pressure on the species composition of the seedbank, building up different communities under the three farming approaches over time. These effects were scale dependent. At a within-field scale, species richness was greatest in organic farms where there was a greater abundance of weeds. At a regional and landscape scale, species richness was greater in integrated and conventional farms. This was particularly evident in integrated farms which represented a greater range of crop types and cropping practices between fields than either conventional of organic farms alone. Increasing the diversity of cropping practices between fields may offer a complementary approach to reducing agrochemical inputs for enhancing arable biodiversity across landscapes. (C) 2010 Published by Elsevier B.V.",
keywords = "systems, weed diversity, biodiversity indicators, conventional agriculture, integrated management, weed seeds, biodiversity, diversity, organic farming, soil, seedbank, land-use, herbicide-tolerant crops, abundance, scale evaluations",
author = "C. Hawes and Squire, {G. R.} and Hallett, {P. D.} and C.A. Watson and M. Young",
year = "2010",
month = "6",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/j.agee.2010.03.010",
language = "English",
volume = "138",
pages = "17--26",
journal = "Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment",
issn = "0167-8809",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1-2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Arable plant communities as indicators of farming practice

AU - Hawes, C.

AU - Squire, G. R.

AU - Hallett, P. D.

AU - Watson, C.A.

AU - Young, M.

PY - 2010/6/15

Y1 - 2010/6/15

N2 - The diversity and abundance of the within-field seedbank and emerged weed flora, were measured in over 100 fields from conventional, integrated and organic farms across the arable east of Scotland. Both seedbank and emerged flora showed significant responses to a management intensity gradient from farms with high agrochemical inputs and winter cropping to those with no inorganic inputs, spring cropping and mixed farming practices. The emerged weed flora was more affected by recent agrochemical inputs than was the seedbank, which is buffered by the persistence of weed seeds in the soil. The seedbank was more strongly influenced by soil characteristics, such as % organic carbon and % total nitrogen, than by management. Overall farming approach (categorised here as organic, integrated and conventional) appeared to exert a selection pressure on the species composition of the seedbank, building up different communities under the three farming approaches over time. These effects were scale dependent. At a within-field scale, species richness was greatest in organic farms where there was a greater abundance of weeds. At a regional and landscape scale, species richness was greater in integrated and conventional farms. This was particularly evident in integrated farms which represented a greater range of crop types and cropping practices between fields than either conventional of organic farms alone. Increasing the diversity of cropping practices between fields may offer a complementary approach to reducing agrochemical inputs for enhancing arable biodiversity across landscapes. (C) 2010 Published by Elsevier B.V.

AB - The diversity and abundance of the within-field seedbank and emerged weed flora, were measured in over 100 fields from conventional, integrated and organic farms across the arable east of Scotland. Both seedbank and emerged flora showed significant responses to a management intensity gradient from farms with high agrochemical inputs and winter cropping to those with no inorganic inputs, spring cropping and mixed farming practices. The emerged weed flora was more affected by recent agrochemical inputs than was the seedbank, which is buffered by the persistence of weed seeds in the soil. The seedbank was more strongly influenced by soil characteristics, such as % organic carbon and % total nitrogen, than by management. Overall farming approach (categorised here as organic, integrated and conventional) appeared to exert a selection pressure on the species composition of the seedbank, building up different communities under the three farming approaches over time. These effects were scale dependent. At a within-field scale, species richness was greatest in organic farms where there was a greater abundance of weeds. At a regional and landscape scale, species richness was greater in integrated and conventional farms. This was particularly evident in integrated farms which represented a greater range of crop types and cropping practices between fields than either conventional of organic farms alone. Increasing the diversity of cropping practices between fields may offer a complementary approach to reducing agrochemical inputs for enhancing arable biodiversity across landscapes. (C) 2010 Published by Elsevier B.V.

KW - systems

KW - weed diversity

KW - biodiversity indicators

KW - conventional agriculture

KW - integrated management

KW - weed seeds

KW - biodiversity

KW - diversity

KW - organic farming

KW - soil

KW - seedbank

KW - land-use

KW - herbicide-tolerant crops

KW - abundance

KW - scale evaluations

U2 - 10.1016/j.agee.2010.03.010

DO - 10.1016/j.agee.2010.03.010

M3 - Article

VL - 138

SP - 17

EP - 26

JO - Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment

JF - Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment

SN - 0167-8809

IS - 1-2

ER -