Architectures of domestication

on emplacing human-animal relations in the North

David G Anderson, Jan Peter Laurens Loovers, Sara Asu Schroer, Robert P Wishart

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)
8 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This article explores human-animal relationships in the North by calling for renewed attention to the infrastructures and architectures, which inscribe them. We draw attention to the self-limiting quality of Arctic architectures that are designed to emphasize mutual autonomy. This approach challenges stark models that would create a crisp, clear separation between domestication as constituting a form of domination or a type of mutualism. By describing several key infrastructures of domestication – of tethers, enclosures, and traps – we hope to draw attention to the silencing of these domestic inventories. By revisiting the metaphor of the domus, we focus on the lands where these relationships are elaborated, relinking Arctic architectures to places of encounter. Drawing on in-depth fieldwork mainly from Northern North America and various sites in Northern Eurasia, we present an ethnographically informed account that stresses the nuanced way that strategies of control are blended with those of care and comfort creating unbounded homes that are good to live in.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)398-416
Number of pages19
JournalJournal of the Royal Anthropological Institute
Volume23
Issue number2
Early online date8 May 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2017

Fingerprint

Arctic
animal
form of domination
infrastructure
metaphor
autonomy
Domestication
Human-animal Relations
Eurasia
Autonomy
Human-animal Relationship
Trap
Domination
Enclosure
Field Work

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities(all)
  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

Architectures of domestication : on emplacing human-animal relations in the North. / Anderson, David G; Loovers, Jan Peter Laurens; Schroer, Sara Asu; Wishart, Robert P.

In: Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, Vol. 23, No. 2, 01.06.2017, p. 398-416.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ae5607bba1664a45a10aa9ea0f0aa733,
title = "Architectures of domestication: on emplacing human-animal relations in the North",
abstract = "This article explores human-animal relationships in the North by calling for renewed attention to the infrastructures and architectures, which inscribe them. We draw attention to the self-limiting quality of Arctic architectures that are designed to emphasize mutual autonomy. This approach challenges stark models that would create a crisp, clear separation between domestication as constituting a form of domination or a type of mutualism. By describing several key infrastructures of domestication – of tethers, enclosures, and traps – we hope to draw attention to the silencing of these domestic inventories. By revisiting the metaphor of the domus, we focus on the lands where these relationships are elaborated, relinking Arctic architectures to places of encounter. Drawing on in-depth fieldwork mainly from Northern North America and various sites in Northern Eurasia, we present an ethnographically informed account that stresses the nuanced way that strategies of control are blended with those of care and comfort creating unbounded homes that are good to live in.",
author = "Anderson, {David G} and Loovers, {Jan Peter Laurens} and Schroer, {Sara Asu} and Wishart, {Robert P}",
note = "Acknowledgements. This fieldwork and discussions which led to this article was sponsored by ERC Advanced Grant 295458 Arctic Domus. We would like to thank Rob Losey, Bente Sundsvold, and Konstantin Klokov for their comments on the manuscript. We would also like to thank that particularly engaging and constructive comments from three anonymous reviewers.",
year = "2017",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/1467-9655.12613",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "398--416",
journal = "Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute",
issn = "1359-0987",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Architectures of domestication

T2 - on emplacing human-animal relations in the North

AU - Anderson, David G

AU - Loovers, Jan Peter Laurens

AU - Schroer, Sara Asu

AU - Wishart, Robert P

N1 - Acknowledgements. This fieldwork and discussions which led to this article was sponsored by ERC Advanced Grant 295458 Arctic Domus. We would like to thank Rob Losey, Bente Sundsvold, and Konstantin Klokov for their comments on the manuscript. We would also like to thank that particularly engaging and constructive comments from three anonymous reviewers.

PY - 2017/6/1

Y1 - 2017/6/1

N2 - This article explores human-animal relationships in the North by calling for renewed attention to the infrastructures and architectures, which inscribe them. We draw attention to the self-limiting quality of Arctic architectures that are designed to emphasize mutual autonomy. This approach challenges stark models that would create a crisp, clear separation between domestication as constituting a form of domination or a type of mutualism. By describing several key infrastructures of domestication – of tethers, enclosures, and traps – we hope to draw attention to the silencing of these domestic inventories. By revisiting the metaphor of the domus, we focus on the lands where these relationships are elaborated, relinking Arctic architectures to places of encounter. Drawing on in-depth fieldwork mainly from Northern North America and various sites in Northern Eurasia, we present an ethnographically informed account that stresses the nuanced way that strategies of control are blended with those of care and comfort creating unbounded homes that are good to live in.

AB - This article explores human-animal relationships in the North by calling for renewed attention to the infrastructures and architectures, which inscribe them. We draw attention to the self-limiting quality of Arctic architectures that are designed to emphasize mutual autonomy. This approach challenges stark models that would create a crisp, clear separation between domestication as constituting a form of domination or a type of mutualism. By describing several key infrastructures of domestication – of tethers, enclosures, and traps – we hope to draw attention to the silencing of these domestic inventories. By revisiting the metaphor of the domus, we focus on the lands where these relationships are elaborated, relinking Arctic architectures to places of encounter. Drawing on in-depth fieldwork mainly from Northern North America and various sites in Northern Eurasia, we present an ethnographically informed account that stresses the nuanced way that strategies of control are blended with those of care and comfort creating unbounded homes that are good to live in.

U2 - 10.1111/1467-9655.12613

DO - 10.1111/1467-9655.12613

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 398

EP - 416

JO - Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute

JF - Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute

SN - 1359-0987

IS - 2

ER -