Are attractive men's faces masculine or feminine? The importance of controlling confounds in face stimuli

Lisa DeBruine, Benedict C. Jones, Finlay G. Smith, Anthony C. Little

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

75 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Women's preferences for male masculinity are highly variable. Although many researchers explain this variability as reflecting systematic individual differences in how women resolve the tradeoff between the costs and benefits of choosing a masculine partner, others suggest that methodological differences between studies are responsible. A recent study found general femininity preferences for judgments of faces manipulated in sexual dimorphism of shape, but general masculinity preferences for judgments of faces based on perceived masculinity. Using the original stimuli, we replicated these previous results, but found equivalent general femininity preferences for both types of faces when non-face confounds in the stimuli (e.g. hairstyle) were eliminated via masking. We conclude that care must be taken to control potential confounds in stimuli and that the influence of non-face cues on preferences for facial masculinity deserves further study.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)751-758
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
Volume36
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2010

Fingerprint

Masculinity
Femininity
Individuality
Sex Characteristics
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Cues
Research Personnel
Stimulus
Masculine

Cite this

Are attractive men's faces masculine or feminine? The importance of controlling confounds in face stimuli. / DeBruine, Lisa; Jones, Benedict C.; Smith, Finlay G.; Little, Anthony C.

In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, Vol. 36, No. 3, 06.2010, p. 751-758.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

DeBruine, Lisa ; Jones, Benedict C. ; Smith, Finlay G. ; Little, Anthony C. / Are attractive men's faces masculine or feminine? The importance of controlling confounds in face stimuli. In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 2010 ; Vol. 36, No. 3. pp. 751-758.
@article{a2d88e6dfeac400891e452d086cc8a29,
title = "Are attractive men's faces masculine or feminine?: The importance of controlling confounds in face stimuli",
abstract = "Women's preferences for male masculinity are highly variable. Although many researchers explain this variability as reflecting systematic individual differences in how women resolve the tradeoff between the costs and benefits of choosing a masculine partner, others suggest that methodological differences between studies are responsible. A recent study found general femininity preferences for judgments of faces manipulated in sexual dimorphism of shape, but general masculinity preferences for judgments of faces based on perceived masculinity. Using the original stimuli, we replicated these previous results, but found equivalent general femininity preferences for both types of faces when non-face confounds in the stimuli (e.g. hairstyle) were eliminated via masking. We conclude that care must be taken to control potential confounds in stimuli and that the influence of non-face cues on preferences for facial masculinity deserves further study.",
author = "Lisa DeBruine and Jones, {Benedict C.} and Smith, {Finlay G.} and Little, {Anthony C.}",
year = "2010",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1037/a0016457",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "751--758",
journal = "Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance",
issn = "0096-1523",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Are attractive men's faces masculine or feminine?

T2 - The importance of controlling confounds in face stimuli

AU - DeBruine, Lisa

AU - Jones, Benedict C.

AU - Smith, Finlay G.

AU - Little, Anthony C.

PY - 2010/6

Y1 - 2010/6

N2 - Women's preferences for male masculinity are highly variable. Although many researchers explain this variability as reflecting systematic individual differences in how women resolve the tradeoff between the costs and benefits of choosing a masculine partner, others suggest that methodological differences between studies are responsible. A recent study found general femininity preferences for judgments of faces manipulated in sexual dimorphism of shape, but general masculinity preferences for judgments of faces based on perceived masculinity. Using the original stimuli, we replicated these previous results, but found equivalent general femininity preferences for both types of faces when non-face confounds in the stimuli (e.g. hairstyle) were eliminated via masking. We conclude that care must be taken to control potential confounds in stimuli and that the influence of non-face cues on preferences for facial masculinity deserves further study.

AB - Women's preferences for male masculinity are highly variable. Although many researchers explain this variability as reflecting systematic individual differences in how women resolve the tradeoff between the costs and benefits of choosing a masculine partner, others suggest that methodological differences between studies are responsible. A recent study found general femininity preferences for judgments of faces manipulated in sexual dimorphism of shape, but general masculinity preferences for judgments of faces based on perceived masculinity. Using the original stimuli, we replicated these previous results, but found equivalent general femininity preferences for both types of faces when non-face confounds in the stimuli (e.g. hairstyle) were eliminated via masking. We conclude that care must be taken to control potential confounds in stimuli and that the influence of non-face cues on preferences for facial masculinity deserves further study.

U2 - 10.1037/a0016457

DO - 10.1037/a0016457

M3 - Article

VL - 36

SP - 751

EP - 758

JO - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

JF - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

SN - 0096-1523

IS - 3

ER -