Are C-reps Contextual Representations?

A Reply to Brewin and Burgess

David G. Pearson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Brewin and Burgess (2013) argue that our recent papers investigating the role of contextualrepresentations in intrusive memories do not pose a challenge to dual-representation theory as originally claimed (Pearson, 2012; Pearson, Ross, & Webster, 2012). Here I point out that their alternative explanation for our results can be rejected using data already published in both papers. I also argue that their definition of what constitutes a contextual representation renders their revised dual-representation theory incompatible with experimental results that have previously been argued in the literature to support it. Valuable though their contribution is, it does not impact on our main conclusion that abstract contextual representations serve to increase intrusive memories for traumatic material.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)220-222
Number of pages3
JournalJournal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry
Volume45
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2014

Fingerprint

Contextual
Render

Keywords

  • PTSD
  • memory
  • contect
  • intrusion

Cite this

Are C-reps Contextual Representations? A Reply to Brewin and Burgess. / Pearson, David G.

In: Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, Vol. 45, No. 1, 03.2014, p. 220-222.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a7288167a36e461e974a24b7bf019ca1,
title = "Are C-reps Contextual Representations?: A Reply to Brewin and Burgess",
abstract = "Brewin and Burgess (2013) argue that our recent papers investigating the role of contextualrepresentations in intrusive memories do not pose a challenge to dual-representation theory as originally claimed (Pearson, 2012; Pearson, Ross, & Webster, 2012). Here I point out that their alternative explanation for our results can be rejected using data already published in both papers. I also argue that their definition of what constitutes a contextual representation renders their revised dual-representation theory incompatible with experimental results that have previously been argued in the literature to support it. Valuable though their contribution is, it does not impact on our main conclusion that abstract contextual representations serve to increase intrusive memories for traumatic material.",
keywords = "PTSD, memory , contect , intrusion",
author = "Pearson, {David G.}",
year = "2014",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1016/j.jbtep.2013.07.010",
language = "English",
volume = "45",
pages = "220--222",
journal = "Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry",
issn = "0005-7916",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Are C-reps Contextual Representations?

T2 - A Reply to Brewin and Burgess

AU - Pearson, David G.

PY - 2014/3

Y1 - 2014/3

N2 - Brewin and Burgess (2013) argue that our recent papers investigating the role of contextualrepresentations in intrusive memories do not pose a challenge to dual-representation theory as originally claimed (Pearson, 2012; Pearson, Ross, & Webster, 2012). Here I point out that their alternative explanation for our results can be rejected using data already published in both papers. I also argue that their definition of what constitutes a contextual representation renders their revised dual-representation theory incompatible with experimental results that have previously been argued in the literature to support it. Valuable though their contribution is, it does not impact on our main conclusion that abstract contextual representations serve to increase intrusive memories for traumatic material.

AB - Brewin and Burgess (2013) argue that our recent papers investigating the role of contextualrepresentations in intrusive memories do not pose a challenge to dual-representation theory as originally claimed (Pearson, 2012; Pearson, Ross, & Webster, 2012). Here I point out that their alternative explanation for our results can be rejected using data already published in both papers. I also argue that their definition of what constitutes a contextual representation renders their revised dual-representation theory incompatible with experimental results that have previously been argued in the literature to support it. Valuable though their contribution is, it does not impact on our main conclusion that abstract contextual representations serve to increase intrusive memories for traumatic material.

KW - PTSD

KW - memory

KW - contect

KW - intrusion

U2 - 10.1016/j.jbtep.2013.07.010

DO - 10.1016/j.jbtep.2013.07.010

M3 - Article

VL - 45

SP - 220

EP - 222

JO - Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry

JF - Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry

SN - 0005-7916

IS - 1

ER -