Are rural residents happier? A quantitative analysis of subjective wellbeing in Scotland

Alana Gilbert, Kathryn Colley, Deborah Roberts

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    11 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This paper uses ordered logit models to test for evidence of systematically higher levels of subjective wellbeing in rural Scotland, differentiating between remote rural and accessible rural areas. Data are drawn from the 2008/9 wave of the BHPS covering a sample of almost 2150 Scottish residents. Two alternative quantitative measures of subjective wellbeing are used in the analysis, one based on life satisfaction, the other on mental wellbeing. The results find statistically significant evidence of higher life satisfaction in remote (but not accessible) rural Scotland after having controlled for the individual characteristics of respondents. In contrast, the mental wellbeing measure is not found to vary across rural-urban space. The paper concludes by suggesting several areas for further analysis emphasising how such research could support Scottish Government policy.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)37-45
    Number of pages9
    JournalJournal of Rural Studies
    Volume44
    Early online date17 Jan 2016
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Apr 2016

    Fingerprint

    quantitative analysis
    resident
    government policy
    evidence
    rural area
    life satisfaction
    analysis
    test

    Keywords

    • Subjective wellbeing
    • Life satisfaction
    • Mental wellbeing
    • Accessible rural areas
    • Remote rural areas
    • Scotland

    Cite this

    Are rural residents happier? A quantitative analysis of subjective wellbeing in Scotland. / Gilbert, Alana; Colley, Kathryn; Roberts, Deborah.

    In: Journal of Rural Studies, Vol. 44, 04.2016, p. 37-45.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    @article{a182a753864645ff9f1bacc24beb68a9,
    title = "Are rural residents happier? A quantitative analysis of subjective wellbeing in Scotland",
    abstract = "This paper uses ordered logit models to test for evidence of systematically higher levels of subjective wellbeing in rural Scotland, differentiating between remote rural and accessible rural areas. Data are drawn from the 2008/9 wave of the BHPS covering a sample of almost 2150 Scottish residents. Two alternative quantitative measures of subjective wellbeing are used in the analysis, one based on life satisfaction, the other on mental wellbeing. The results find statistically significant evidence of higher life satisfaction in remote (but not accessible) rural Scotland after having controlled for the individual characteristics of respondents. In contrast, the mental wellbeing measure is not found to vary across rural-urban space. The paper concludes by suggesting several areas for further analysis emphasising how such research could support Scottish Government policy.",
    keywords = "Subjective wellbeing, Life satisfaction, Mental wellbeing, Accessible rural areas, Remote rural areas, Scotland",
    author = "Alana Gilbert and Kathryn Colley and Deborah Roberts",
    note = "Data from the British Household Panel Survey (BHPS) were supplied by the UK Data Archive. The main British Household Panel Survey (BHPS) is conducted by the ESRC UK Longitudinal Studies Centre (ULSC), together with the Institute for Social and Economic Research (ISER) at the University of Essex. Neither the original collectors of the data nor the Archive bear any responsibility for the analysis or interpretations presented here. This research is funded by Scottish Government's Rural and Environmental Science and Analytical Services Division (RESAS) under Theme 8 ‘Vibrant Rural Communities’ of the Food, Land and People Programme (2011–2016). The authors would like to thank Adekunle Ibiyemi, Bill Slee and Jonathan Hopkins for their helpful input at earlier stages of the research.",
    year = "2016",
    month = "4",
    doi = "10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.01.002",
    language = "English",
    volume = "44",
    pages = "37--45",
    journal = "Journal of Rural Studies",
    issn = "0743-0167",
    publisher = "PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Are rural residents happier? A quantitative analysis of subjective wellbeing in Scotland

    AU - Gilbert, Alana

    AU - Colley, Kathryn

    AU - Roberts, Deborah

    N1 - Data from the British Household Panel Survey (BHPS) were supplied by the UK Data Archive. The main British Household Panel Survey (BHPS) is conducted by the ESRC UK Longitudinal Studies Centre (ULSC), together with the Institute for Social and Economic Research (ISER) at the University of Essex. Neither the original collectors of the data nor the Archive bear any responsibility for the analysis or interpretations presented here. This research is funded by Scottish Government's Rural and Environmental Science and Analytical Services Division (RESAS) under Theme 8 ‘Vibrant Rural Communities’ of the Food, Land and People Programme (2011–2016). The authors would like to thank Adekunle Ibiyemi, Bill Slee and Jonathan Hopkins for their helpful input at earlier stages of the research.

    PY - 2016/4

    Y1 - 2016/4

    N2 - This paper uses ordered logit models to test for evidence of systematically higher levels of subjective wellbeing in rural Scotland, differentiating between remote rural and accessible rural areas. Data are drawn from the 2008/9 wave of the BHPS covering a sample of almost 2150 Scottish residents. Two alternative quantitative measures of subjective wellbeing are used in the analysis, one based on life satisfaction, the other on mental wellbeing. The results find statistically significant evidence of higher life satisfaction in remote (but not accessible) rural Scotland after having controlled for the individual characteristics of respondents. In contrast, the mental wellbeing measure is not found to vary across rural-urban space. The paper concludes by suggesting several areas for further analysis emphasising how such research could support Scottish Government policy.

    AB - This paper uses ordered logit models to test for evidence of systematically higher levels of subjective wellbeing in rural Scotland, differentiating between remote rural and accessible rural areas. Data are drawn from the 2008/9 wave of the BHPS covering a sample of almost 2150 Scottish residents. Two alternative quantitative measures of subjective wellbeing are used in the analysis, one based on life satisfaction, the other on mental wellbeing. The results find statistically significant evidence of higher life satisfaction in remote (but not accessible) rural Scotland after having controlled for the individual characteristics of respondents. In contrast, the mental wellbeing measure is not found to vary across rural-urban space. The paper concludes by suggesting several areas for further analysis emphasising how such research could support Scottish Government policy.

    KW - Subjective wellbeing

    KW - Life satisfaction

    KW - Mental wellbeing

    KW - Accessible rural areas

    KW - Remote rural areas

    KW - Scotland

    U2 - 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.01.002

    DO - 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.01.002

    M3 - Article

    VL - 44

    SP - 37

    EP - 45

    JO - Journal of Rural Studies

    JF - Journal of Rural Studies

    SN - 0743-0167

    ER -