Are the proposed limits of energy intake:basal metabolic rate and dietary nitrogen:urinary nitrogen ratios suitable for validation of food intake?

C. P. Sanchez-Castillo, M. Franklin, G. McNeill, M. de Lourdes Solano, S. Bonner, N. Lopez, L. H. Davidson, W. P. James

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The validity of 7 d weighed records of diet obtained for pre-menopausal Mexican women was assessed by two independent methods: the energy intake:BMR (EI:BMR) and the dietary N:urinary N (DN:UN). For the latter, complete urine collections are required and completeness was assessed from measurements of para-aminobenzoic acid (PABA) excretion. There were forty-six adult female subjects in the study, thirty-four were from Mexico City and twelve were from a rural population in the Central Highlands, Mexico. However, data were rejected from five urban women for whom the PABA excretion data suggested incomplete urine collection on four or more days. BMR was measured with Oxylog portable O-2 consumption meters, and physical activity level was assessed from a self-completed activity diary. An approximate relationship between the EI:BMR ratio and the DN:UN ratio suggested that the rejection limits on the EI:BMR ratio recommended by are wider than the limits on the DN:UN ratio recommended by . Using the recommended cut-off points for EI:BMR but wider limits for DN:UN, twenty-one and twenty-five women respectively had acceptable intake records by the two methods, and sixteen of them by both methods. In conclusion the modification of the DN:UN limits to 0.92 and 1.70 to set acceptable intake values makes the use of measurements of N and energy balance comparable. Urine values with PABA recoveries greater than 100 +/- 15 % should be rejected, as should UN values validated by less than 3 d.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)725-731
Number of pages7
JournalBritish Journal of Nutrition
Volume85
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2001

Keywords

  • validation
  • food intake
  • methodology
  • fundamental principles
  • life-style
  • women
  • men
  • physiology
  • fatness

Cite this

Are the proposed limits of energy intake:basal metabolic rate and dietary nitrogen:urinary nitrogen ratios suitable for validation of food intake? / Sanchez-Castillo, C. P.; Franklin, M.; McNeill, G.; de Lourdes Solano, M.; Bonner, S.; Lopez, N.; Davidson, L. H.; James, W. P.

In: British Journal of Nutrition, Vol. 85, No. 6, 05.2001, p. 725-731.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sanchez-Castillo, C. P. ; Franklin, M. ; McNeill, G. ; de Lourdes Solano, M. ; Bonner, S. ; Lopez, N. ; Davidson, L. H. ; James, W. P. / Are the proposed limits of energy intake:basal metabolic rate and dietary nitrogen:urinary nitrogen ratios suitable for validation of food intake?. In: British Journal of Nutrition. 2001 ; Vol. 85, No. 6. pp. 725-731.
@article{b074120d13ed4b789e38e958ecad8db4,
title = "Are the proposed limits of energy intake:basal metabolic rate and dietary nitrogen:urinary nitrogen ratios suitable for validation of food intake?",
abstract = "The validity of 7 d weighed records of diet obtained for pre-menopausal Mexican women was assessed by two independent methods: the energy intake:BMR (EI:BMR) and the dietary N:urinary N (DN:UN). For the latter, complete urine collections are required and completeness was assessed from measurements of para-aminobenzoic acid (PABA) excretion. There were forty-six adult female subjects in the study, thirty-four were from Mexico City and twelve were from a rural population in the Central Highlands, Mexico. However, data were rejected from five urban women for whom the PABA excretion data suggested incomplete urine collection on four or more days. BMR was measured with Oxylog portable O-2 consumption meters, and physical activity level was assessed from a self-completed activity diary. An approximate relationship between the EI:BMR ratio and the DN:UN ratio suggested that the rejection limits on the EI:BMR ratio recommended by are wider than the limits on the DN:UN ratio recommended by . Using the recommended cut-off points for EI:BMR but wider limits for DN:UN, twenty-one and twenty-five women respectively had acceptable intake records by the two methods, and sixteen of them by both methods. In conclusion the modification of the DN:UN limits to 0.92 and 1.70 to set acceptable intake values makes the use of measurements of N and energy balance comparable. Urine values with PABA recoveries greater than 100 +/- 15 {\%} should be rejected, as should UN values validated by less than 3 d.",
keywords = "validation, food intake, methodology, fundamental principles, life-style, women, men, physiology, fatness",
author = "Sanchez-Castillo, {C. P.} and M. Franklin and G. McNeill and {de Lourdes Solano}, M. and S. Bonner and N. Lopez and Davidson, {L. H.} and James, {W. P.}",
year = "2001",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1079/BJN2001327",
language = "English",
volume = "85",
pages = "725--731",
journal = "British Journal of Nutrition",
issn = "0007-1145",
publisher = "Cambridge Univ. Press.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Are the proposed limits of energy intake:basal metabolic rate and dietary nitrogen:urinary nitrogen ratios suitable for validation of food intake?

AU - Sanchez-Castillo, C. P.

AU - Franklin, M.

AU - McNeill, G.

AU - de Lourdes Solano, M.

AU - Bonner, S.

AU - Lopez, N.

AU - Davidson, L. H.

AU - James, W. P.

PY - 2001/5

Y1 - 2001/5

N2 - The validity of 7 d weighed records of diet obtained for pre-menopausal Mexican women was assessed by two independent methods: the energy intake:BMR (EI:BMR) and the dietary N:urinary N (DN:UN). For the latter, complete urine collections are required and completeness was assessed from measurements of para-aminobenzoic acid (PABA) excretion. There were forty-six adult female subjects in the study, thirty-four were from Mexico City and twelve were from a rural population in the Central Highlands, Mexico. However, data were rejected from five urban women for whom the PABA excretion data suggested incomplete urine collection on four or more days. BMR was measured with Oxylog portable O-2 consumption meters, and physical activity level was assessed from a self-completed activity diary. An approximate relationship between the EI:BMR ratio and the DN:UN ratio suggested that the rejection limits on the EI:BMR ratio recommended by are wider than the limits on the DN:UN ratio recommended by . Using the recommended cut-off points for EI:BMR but wider limits for DN:UN, twenty-one and twenty-five women respectively had acceptable intake records by the two methods, and sixteen of them by both methods. In conclusion the modification of the DN:UN limits to 0.92 and 1.70 to set acceptable intake values makes the use of measurements of N and energy balance comparable. Urine values with PABA recoveries greater than 100 +/- 15 % should be rejected, as should UN values validated by less than 3 d.

AB - The validity of 7 d weighed records of diet obtained for pre-menopausal Mexican women was assessed by two independent methods: the energy intake:BMR (EI:BMR) and the dietary N:urinary N (DN:UN). For the latter, complete urine collections are required and completeness was assessed from measurements of para-aminobenzoic acid (PABA) excretion. There were forty-six adult female subjects in the study, thirty-four were from Mexico City and twelve were from a rural population in the Central Highlands, Mexico. However, data were rejected from five urban women for whom the PABA excretion data suggested incomplete urine collection on four or more days. BMR was measured with Oxylog portable O-2 consumption meters, and physical activity level was assessed from a self-completed activity diary. An approximate relationship between the EI:BMR ratio and the DN:UN ratio suggested that the rejection limits on the EI:BMR ratio recommended by are wider than the limits on the DN:UN ratio recommended by . Using the recommended cut-off points for EI:BMR but wider limits for DN:UN, twenty-one and twenty-five women respectively had acceptable intake records by the two methods, and sixteen of them by both methods. In conclusion the modification of the DN:UN limits to 0.92 and 1.70 to set acceptable intake values makes the use of measurements of N and energy balance comparable. Urine values with PABA recoveries greater than 100 +/- 15 % should be rejected, as should UN values validated by less than 3 d.

KW - validation

KW - food intake

KW - methodology

KW - fundamental principles

KW - life-style

KW - women

KW - men

KW - physiology

KW - fatness

U2 - 10.1079/BJN2001327

DO - 10.1079/BJN2001327

M3 - Article

VL - 85

SP - 725

EP - 731

JO - British Journal of Nutrition

JF - British Journal of Nutrition

SN - 0007-1145

IS - 6

ER -