Argument-based negotiation in a social context

Nishan C. Karunatillake, Nicholas R. Jennings, Iyad Rahwan, Timothy J Norman

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Argumentation-based negotiation (ABN) provides agents with an effective means to resolve conflicts within a multi-agent society. However, to engage in such argumentative encounters the agents require the ability to generate arguments, which, in turn, demands four fundamental capabilities: a schema to reason in a social context, a mechanism to identify a suitable set of arguments, a language and a protocol to exchange these arguments, and a decision making functionality to generate such dialogues. This paper focuses on the first two issues and formulates models to capture them. Specifically, we propose a coherent schema, based on social commitments, to capture social influences emanating from the roles and relationships of a multi-agent society. After explaining how agents can use this schema to reason within a society, we then use it to identify two major ways of exploiting social influence within ABN to resolve conflicts. The first of these allows agents to argue about the validity of each other's social reasoning, whereas the second enables agents to exploit social influences by incorporating them as parameters within their negotiation. For each of these, we use our schema to systematically capture a comprehensive set of social arguments that can be used within a multi-agent society.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationArgumentatiton in Multi-agent Systems
Subtitle of host publicationSecond International Workshop, ArgMAS 2005, Utrecht, Netherlands
EditorsS. Parsons, N. Maudet, P. Moraitis, I. Rahwan
Place of PublicationBerlin, Germany
PublisherSpringer Science+Business Media
Pages104-121
Number of pages18
Volume4049
ISBN (Print) 3540363556, 978-3540363552
Publication statusPublished - 6 Jul 2006
Event2nd International Workshop on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems - Utrecht, Netherlands
Duration: 26 Jul 200526 Jul 2005

Publication series

NameLecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence
PublisherSpringer-Verlag
Number4049
ISSN (Print)0302-9743

Conference

Conference2nd International Workshop on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems
CountryNetherlands
City Utrecht
Period26/07/0526/07/05

Keywords

  • argumentation-based negotiation
  • conflict resolution
  • agents

Cite this

Karunatillake, N. C., Jennings, N. R., Rahwan, I., & Norman, T. J. (2006). Argument-based negotiation in a social context. In S. Parsons, N. Maudet, P. Moraitis, & I. Rahwan (Eds.), Argumentatiton in Multi-agent Systems : Second International Workshop, ArgMAS 2005, Utrecht, Netherlands (Vol. 4049, pp. 104-121). (Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence; No. 4049 ). Berlin, Germany: Springer Science+Business Media.

Argument-based negotiation in a social context. / Karunatillake, Nishan C.; Jennings, Nicholas R.; Rahwan, Iyad; Norman, Timothy J.

Argumentatiton in Multi-agent Systems : Second International Workshop, ArgMAS 2005, Utrecht, Netherlands. ed. / S. Parsons; N. Maudet; P. Moraitis; I. Rahwan. Vol. 4049 Berlin, Germany : Springer Science+Business Media, 2006. p. 104-121 (Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence; No. 4049 ).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Karunatillake, NC, Jennings, NR, Rahwan, I & Norman, TJ 2006, Argument-based negotiation in a social context. in S Parsons, N Maudet, P Moraitis & I Rahwan (eds), Argumentatiton in Multi-agent Systems : Second International Workshop, ArgMAS 2005, Utrecht, Netherlands. vol. 4049, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, no. 4049 , Springer Science+Business Media, Berlin, Germany, pp. 104-121, 2nd International Workshop on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems , Utrecht, Netherlands, 26/07/05.
Karunatillake NC, Jennings NR, Rahwan I, Norman TJ. Argument-based negotiation in a social context. In Parsons S, Maudet N, Moraitis P, Rahwan I, editors, Argumentatiton in Multi-agent Systems : Second International Workshop, ArgMAS 2005, Utrecht, Netherlands. Vol. 4049. Berlin, Germany: Springer Science+Business Media. 2006. p. 104-121. (Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence; 4049 ).
Karunatillake, Nishan C. ; Jennings, Nicholas R. ; Rahwan, Iyad ; Norman, Timothy J. / Argument-based negotiation in a social context. Argumentatiton in Multi-agent Systems : Second International Workshop, ArgMAS 2005, Utrecht, Netherlands. editor / S. Parsons ; N. Maudet ; P. Moraitis ; I. Rahwan. Vol. 4049 Berlin, Germany : Springer Science+Business Media, 2006. pp. 104-121 (Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence; 4049 ).
@inbook{3748044410864be7a44912c0c18629a0,
title = "Argument-based negotiation in a social context",
abstract = "Argumentation-based negotiation (ABN) provides agents with an effective means to resolve conflicts within a multi-agent society. However, to engage in such argumentative encounters the agents require the ability to generate arguments, which, in turn, demands four fundamental capabilities: a schema to reason in a social context, a mechanism to identify a suitable set of arguments, a language and a protocol to exchange these arguments, and a decision making functionality to generate such dialogues. This paper focuses on the first two issues and formulates models to capture them. Specifically, we propose a coherent schema, based on social commitments, to capture social influences emanating from the roles and relationships of a multi-agent society. After explaining how agents can use this schema to reason within a society, we then use it to identify two major ways of exploiting social influence within ABN to resolve conflicts. The first of these allows agents to argue about the validity of each other's social reasoning, whereas the second enables agents to exploit social influences by incorporating them as parameters within their negotiation. For each of these, we use our schema to systematically capture a comprehensive set of social arguments that can be used within a multi-agent society.",
keywords = "argumentation-based negotiation, conflict resolution, agents",
author = "Karunatillake, {Nishan C.} and Jennings, {Nicholas R.} and Iyad Rahwan and Norman, {Timothy J}",
year = "2006",
month = "7",
day = "6",
language = "English",
isbn = "3540363556",
volume = "4049",
series = "Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence",
publisher = "Springer Science+Business Media",
number = "4049",
pages = "104--121",
editor = "S. Parsons and N. Maudet and P. Moraitis and I. Rahwan",
booktitle = "Argumentatiton in Multi-agent Systems",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Argument-based negotiation in a social context

AU - Karunatillake, Nishan C.

AU - Jennings, Nicholas R.

AU - Rahwan, Iyad

AU - Norman, Timothy J

PY - 2006/7/6

Y1 - 2006/7/6

N2 - Argumentation-based negotiation (ABN) provides agents with an effective means to resolve conflicts within a multi-agent society. However, to engage in such argumentative encounters the agents require the ability to generate arguments, which, in turn, demands four fundamental capabilities: a schema to reason in a social context, a mechanism to identify a suitable set of arguments, a language and a protocol to exchange these arguments, and a decision making functionality to generate such dialogues. This paper focuses on the first two issues and formulates models to capture them. Specifically, we propose a coherent schema, based on social commitments, to capture social influences emanating from the roles and relationships of a multi-agent society. After explaining how agents can use this schema to reason within a society, we then use it to identify two major ways of exploiting social influence within ABN to resolve conflicts. The first of these allows agents to argue about the validity of each other's social reasoning, whereas the second enables agents to exploit social influences by incorporating them as parameters within their negotiation. For each of these, we use our schema to systematically capture a comprehensive set of social arguments that can be used within a multi-agent society.

AB - Argumentation-based negotiation (ABN) provides agents with an effective means to resolve conflicts within a multi-agent society. However, to engage in such argumentative encounters the agents require the ability to generate arguments, which, in turn, demands four fundamental capabilities: a schema to reason in a social context, a mechanism to identify a suitable set of arguments, a language and a protocol to exchange these arguments, and a decision making functionality to generate such dialogues. This paper focuses on the first two issues and formulates models to capture them. Specifically, we propose a coherent schema, based on social commitments, to capture social influences emanating from the roles and relationships of a multi-agent society. After explaining how agents can use this schema to reason within a society, we then use it to identify two major ways of exploiting social influence within ABN to resolve conflicts. The first of these allows agents to argue about the validity of each other's social reasoning, whereas the second enables agents to exploit social influences by incorporating them as parameters within their negotiation. For each of these, we use our schema to systematically capture a comprehensive set of social arguments that can be used within a multi-agent society.

KW - argumentation-based negotiation

KW - conflict resolution

KW - agents

M3 - Chapter

SN - 3540363556

SN - 978-3540363552

VL - 4049

T3 - Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence

SP - 104

EP - 121

BT - Argumentatiton in Multi-agent Systems

A2 - Parsons, S.

A2 - Maudet, N.

A2 - Moraitis, P.

A2 - Rahwan, I.

PB - Springer Science+Business Media

CY - Berlin, Germany

ER -