Argumentation-Logic for Explaining Anomalous Patient Responses to Treatments

Maria Adela Grando, Laura Moss, David Glasspool, Derek Sleeman, Malcolm Sim, Charlotte Gilhooly, John Kinsella

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Abstract. The EIRA system has proved to be successful in the detection of anomalous patient responses to treatments in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). One weakness of EIRA is the lack of mechanisms to describe to the clinicians, rationales behind the anomalous detections. In this paper, we extend EIRA by providing it with an argumentation-based justification system that formalizes and communicates to the clinicians the reasons why a patient response is anomalous. The implemented justification system uses human-like argumentation techniques and is based on real dialogues between ICU clinicians.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationAIME 2011 Conference Proceedings
Place of PublicationBerlin
PublisherSpringer
Publication statusPublished - 2011

Fingerprint

Intensive Care Units
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • knowledge-based expert systems
  • explanation
  • argumentation logic
  • ontology
  • intensive care unit

Cite this

Grando, M. A., Moss, L., Glasspool, D., Sleeman, D., Sim, M., Gilhooly, C., & Kinsella, J. (2011). Argumentation-Logic for Explaining Anomalous Patient Responses to Treatments. In AIME 2011 Conference Proceedings Berlin: Springer .

Argumentation-Logic for Explaining Anomalous Patient Responses to Treatments. / Grando, Maria Adela ; Moss, Laura; Glasspool, David ; Sleeman, Derek; Sim, Malcolm; Gilhooly, Charlotte ; Kinsella, John .

AIME 2011 Conference Proceedings. Berlin : Springer , 2011.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution

Grando, MA, Moss, L, Glasspool, D, Sleeman, D, Sim, M, Gilhooly, C & Kinsella, J 2011, Argumentation-Logic for Explaining Anomalous Patient Responses to Treatments. in AIME 2011 Conference Proceedings. Springer , Berlin.
Grando MA, Moss L, Glasspool D, Sleeman D, Sim M, Gilhooly C et al. Argumentation-Logic for Explaining Anomalous Patient Responses to Treatments. In AIME 2011 Conference Proceedings. Berlin: Springer . 2011
Grando, Maria Adela ; Moss, Laura ; Glasspool, David ; Sleeman, Derek ; Sim, Malcolm ; Gilhooly, Charlotte ; Kinsella, John . / Argumentation-Logic for Explaining Anomalous Patient Responses to Treatments. AIME 2011 Conference Proceedings. Berlin : Springer , 2011.
@inproceedings{6cbfb69dd18b48538f773e590d504c7d,
title = "Argumentation-Logic for Explaining Anomalous Patient Responses to Treatments",
abstract = "Abstract. The EIRA system has proved to be successful in the detection of anomalous patient responses to treatments in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). One weakness of EIRA is the lack of mechanisms to describe to the clinicians, rationales behind the anomalous detections. In this paper, we extend EIRA by providing it with an argumentation-based justification system that formalizes and communicates to the clinicians the reasons why a patient response is anomalous. The implemented justification system uses human-like argumentation techniques and is based on real dialogues between ICU clinicians.",
keywords = "knowledge-based expert systems, explanation, argumentation logic, ontology, intensive care unit",
author = "Grando, {Maria Adela} and Laura Moss and David Glasspool and Derek Sleeman and Malcolm Sim and Charlotte Gilhooly and John Kinsella",
year = "2011",
language = "English",
booktitle = "AIME 2011 Conference Proceedings",
publisher = "Springer",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Argumentation-Logic for Explaining Anomalous Patient Responses to Treatments

AU - Grando, Maria Adela

AU - Moss, Laura

AU - Glasspool, David

AU - Sleeman, Derek

AU - Sim, Malcolm

AU - Gilhooly, Charlotte

AU - Kinsella, John

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Abstract. The EIRA system has proved to be successful in the detection of anomalous patient responses to treatments in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). One weakness of EIRA is the lack of mechanisms to describe to the clinicians, rationales behind the anomalous detections. In this paper, we extend EIRA by providing it with an argumentation-based justification system that formalizes and communicates to the clinicians the reasons why a patient response is anomalous. The implemented justification system uses human-like argumentation techniques and is based on real dialogues between ICU clinicians.

AB - Abstract. The EIRA system has proved to be successful in the detection of anomalous patient responses to treatments in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). One weakness of EIRA is the lack of mechanisms to describe to the clinicians, rationales behind the anomalous detections. In this paper, we extend EIRA by providing it with an argumentation-based justification system that formalizes and communicates to the clinicians the reasons why a patient response is anomalous. The implemented justification system uses human-like argumentation techniques and is based on real dialogues between ICU clinicians.

KW - knowledge-based expert systems

KW - explanation

KW - argumentation logic

KW - ontology

KW - intensive care unit

M3 - Conference contribution

BT - AIME 2011 Conference Proceedings

PB - Springer

CY - Berlin

ER -