Argumentation schemes for collaborative planning

Alice Toniolo, Timothy J Norman, Katia P Sycara

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

2 Citations (Scopus)
4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

We address the collaborative planning problem in teams of agents where partners have dierent objectives and norms. In this context, agreeing on the best course of action to adopt represents a significant challenge. Concurrent actions and causal plan-constraints may lead to conflicts of opinion on what to do. Moreover, individual norms can constrain agent behaviour. We propose an argumentation-based model for deliberative dialogues based on argumentation schemes. This model facilitates agreements about joint plans by enriching the quality of the dialogue through the exchange of relevant information about plan commitments and norms.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationAgents in Principle, Agents in Practice
EditorsDavid Kinny, Jane Young-jen Hsu, Guido Governatori, Aditya K. Ghose
PublisherSpringer Berlin / Heidelberg
Pages323-335
Number of pages13
Volume7047
ISBN (Electronic)978-3-642-25044-6
ISBN (Print)978-3-642-25043-9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011
Event14th International Conference, PRIMA 2011 - Wollongong, Australia
Duration: 16 Nov 201118 Nov 2011

Publication series

NameLecture Notes in Computer Science
PublisherSpringer Berlin Heidelberg
Volume7047

Conference

Conference14th International Conference, PRIMA 2011
CountryAustralia
CityWollongong
Period16/11/1118/11/11

Keywords

  • argumentation schemes
  • practical reasoning
  • planning

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Argumentation schemes for collaborative planning'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this