Assessing patients' participation and quality of decision-making

Vikki Ann Entwistle, Ian S. Watt, Ken Gilhooly, Carol Bugge, Neva Elizabeth Haites, Anne Elizabeth Walker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

49 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In the context of a qualitative study exploring patients' participation in decision-making, we investigated how people interpret and respond to structured questions about decision-making about their health care. Seventy-four participants who attended consultations in five clinical areas completed structured measures of decision-making and discussed their responses during interviews. They identified a range of decisions as having being made in their consultations. People who picked particular responses on measures of participation in and satisfaction with decision-making gave varied explanations for these, not all of which were consistent with the way their responses are usually interpreted. The interview data suggest that people's evaluations of decisions to follow a particular course of action were influenced by various factors including what they focused on as the alternative, their perceptions of constraints on choices, and their assessment of how good the best possible solution was. Responses to simple structured measures of participation in and satisfaction with decision-making should be interpreted with caution. They are not reliably attributable to health care providers' actions and are thus unsuitable for performance assessment purposes.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)105-113
Number of pages9
JournalPatient Education and Counseling
Volume55
Issue number1
Early online date6 Nov 2003
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2004

Fingerprint

Patient Participation
Decision Making
Referral and Consultation
Interviews
Health Personnel
Delivery of Health Care

Keywords

  • Attitude of Health Personnel
  • Communication
  • Cooperative Behavior
  • Decision Making
  • England
  • Family Planning Services
  • Family Practice
  • Female
  • Genetics, Medical
  • Health Care Surveys
  • Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
  • Homeopathy
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Medical Oncology
  • Middle Aged
  • Patient Participation
  • Physician-Patient Relations
  • Qualitative Research
  • Questionnaires
  • Referral and Consultation
  • Role
  • Scotland
  • Self Concept
  • decision quality
  • shared decision-making
  • performance assessment

Cite this

Entwistle, V. A., Watt, I. S., Gilhooly, K., Bugge, C., Haites, N. E., & Walker, A. E. (2004). Assessing patients' participation and quality of decision-making. Patient Education and Counseling, 55(1), 105-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2003.08.005

Assessing patients' participation and quality of decision-making. / Entwistle, Vikki Ann; Watt, Ian S.; Gilhooly, Ken; Bugge, Carol; Haites, Neva Elizabeth; Walker, Anne Elizabeth.

In: Patient Education and Counseling, Vol. 55, No. 1, 01.10.2004, p. 105-113.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Entwistle, VA, Watt, IS, Gilhooly, K, Bugge, C, Haites, NE & Walker, AE 2004, 'Assessing patients' participation and quality of decision-making', Patient Education and Counseling, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 105-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2003.08.005
Entwistle VA, Watt IS, Gilhooly K, Bugge C, Haites NE, Walker AE. Assessing patients' participation and quality of decision-making. Patient Education and Counseling. 2004 Oct 1;55(1):105-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2003.08.005
Entwistle, Vikki Ann ; Watt, Ian S. ; Gilhooly, Ken ; Bugge, Carol ; Haites, Neva Elizabeth ; Walker, Anne Elizabeth. / Assessing patients' participation and quality of decision-making. In: Patient Education and Counseling. 2004 ; Vol. 55, No. 1. pp. 105-113.
@article{441c8de9aac74b948ea8685756776163,
title = "Assessing patients' participation and quality of decision-making",
abstract = "In the context of a qualitative study exploring patients' participation in decision-making, we investigated how people interpret and respond to structured questions about decision-making about their health care. Seventy-four participants who attended consultations in five clinical areas completed structured measures of decision-making and discussed their responses during interviews. They identified a range of decisions as having being made in their consultations. People who picked particular responses on measures of participation in and satisfaction with decision-making gave varied explanations for these, not all of which were consistent with the way their responses are usually interpreted. The interview data suggest that people's evaluations of decisions to follow a particular course of action were influenced by various factors including what they focused on as the alternative, their perceptions of constraints on choices, and their assessment of how good the best possible solution was. Responses to simple structured measures of participation in and satisfaction with decision-making should be interpreted with caution. They are not reliably attributable to health care providers' actions and are thus unsuitable for performance assessment purposes.",
keywords = "Attitude of Health Personnel, Communication, Cooperative Behavior, Decision Making, England, Family Planning Services, Family Practice, Female, Genetics, Medical, Health Care Surveys, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Homeopathy, Humans, Male, Medical Oncology, Middle Aged, Patient Participation, Physician-Patient Relations, Qualitative Research, Questionnaires, Referral and Consultation, Role, Scotland, Self Concept, decision quality, shared decision-making, performance assessment",
author = "Entwistle, {Vikki Ann} and Watt, {Ian S.} and Ken Gilhooly and Carol Bugge and Haites, {Neva Elizabeth} and Walker, {Anne Elizabeth}",
year = "2004",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.pec.2003.08.005",
language = "English",
volume = "55",
pages = "105--113",
journal = "Patient Education and Counseling",
issn = "0738-3991",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessing patients' participation and quality of decision-making

AU - Entwistle, Vikki Ann

AU - Watt, Ian S.

AU - Gilhooly, Ken

AU - Bugge, Carol

AU - Haites, Neva Elizabeth

AU - Walker, Anne Elizabeth

PY - 2004/10/1

Y1 - 2004/10/1

N2 - In the context of a qualitative study exploring patients' participation in decision-making, we investigated how people interpret and respond to structured questions about decision-making about their health care. Seventy-four participants who attended consultations in five clinical areas completed structured measures of decision-making and discussed their responses during interviews. They identified a range of decisions as having being made in their consultations. People who picked particular responses on measures of participation in and satisfaction with decision-making gave varied explanations for these, not all of which were consistent with the way their responses are usually interpreted. The interview data suggest that people's evaluations of decisions to follow a particular course of action were influenced by various factors including what they focused on as the alternative, their perceptions of constraints on choices, and their assessment of how good the best possible solution was. Responses to simple structured measures of participation in and satisfaction with decision-making should be interpreted with caution. They are not reliably attributable to health care providers' actions and are thus unsuitable for performance assessment purposes.

AB - In the context of a qualitative study exploring patients' participation in decision-making, we investigated how people interpret and respond to structured questions about decision-making about their health care. Seventy-four participants who attended consultations in five clinical areas completed structured measures of decision-making and discussed their responses during interviews. They identified a range of decisions as having being made in their consultations. People who picked particular responses on measures of participation in and satisfaction with decision-making gave varied explanations for these, not all of which were consistent with the way their responses are usually interpreted. The interview data suggest that people's evaluations of decisions to follow a particular course of action were influenced by various factors including what they focused on as the alternative, their perceptions of constraints on choices, and their assessment of how good the best possible solution was. Responses to simple structured measures of participation in and satisfaction with decision-making should be interpreted with caution. They are not reliably attributable to health care providers' actions and are thus unsuitable for performance assessment purposes.

KW - Attitude of Health Personnel

KW - Communication

KW - Cooperative Behavior

KW - Decision Making

KW - England

KW - Family Planning Services

KW - Family Practice

KW - Female

KW - Genetics, Medical

KW - Health Care Surveys

KW - Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice

KW - Homeopathy

KW - Humans

KW - Male

KW - Medical Oncology

KW - Middle Aged

KW - Patient Participation

KW - Physician-Patient Relations

KW - Qualitative Research

KW - Questionnaires

KW - Referral and Consultation

KW - Role

KW - Scotland

KW - Self Concept

KW - decision quality

KW - shared decision-making

KW - performance assessment

U2 - 10.1016/j.pec.2003.08.005

DO - 10.1016/j.pec.2003.08.005

M3 - Article

VL - 55

SP - 105

EP - 113

JO - Patient Education and Counseling

JF - Patient Education and Counseling

SN - 0738-3991

IS - 1

ER -