Assessment by comparison with DNS data of turbulence models used in simulations of mixed convection

W. S. Kim, S. He, J. D. Jackson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

82 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The paper presents an assessment of the performance of a variety of turbulence models in simulating buoyancy-aided, turbulent mixed convection in vertical pipes. This has been done by comparison of RANS predictions with DNS results already available in the literature. Both the RANS and the DNS studies were conducted for conditions of constant and uniform fluid properties with the influence of buoyancy being accounted for using the Boussinesq approximation. This eliminated effects of non-uniformity of properties other than through the action of buoyancy and enabled its influence to be considered in isolation. In the course of the study, the turbulence models have been classified into two groups, namely, those which were able to capture the main features of buoyancy-influenced heat transfer (Group one) and those that were not able to do so (Group two). Common features in model formulation have been identified for each group. It is shown that the response to buoyancy of commonly-used controlling parameters in turbulence damping functions varies significantly and that the performance of a model can largely be correlated with the type of controlling parameter used. A significant defect of the Group-one models which has been identified is that they continue to predict that the 'viscous sub-layer' remains thick as a result of the influence of buoyancy even when the velocity profile has been distorted to an extent that it has become inverted in the core, whereas DNS data clearly show that this is not the case. The use of different methodologies for modelling direct production of turbulence through the direct action of buoyancy has been shown to have little effect on predictions of mixed convection in vertical flows because the effect of buoyancy on turbulence is predominantly due to the indirect effect. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1293-1312
Number of pages20
JournalInternational Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer
Volume51
Issue number5-6
Early online date31 Jan 2008
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2008

Keywords

  • mixed convection
  • buoyancy
  • turbulence models
  • variable properties
  • direct numerical-simulation
  • predicting fluid-flow
  • heat-transfer
  • vertical tubes
  • field calculations
  • reattaching flows
  • epsilon-model
  • air-flows
  • temperature
  • velocity

Cite this

Assessment by comparison with DNS data of turbulence models used in simulations of mixed convection. / Kim, W. S.; He, S.; Jackson, J. D.

In: International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, Vol. 51, No. 5-6, 03.2008, p. 1293-1312.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{af90532d34a547adb1b460e20321ade4,
title = "Assessment by comparison with DNS data of turbulence models used in simulations of mixed convection",
abstract = "The paper presents an assessment of the performance of a variety of turbulence models in simulating buoyancy-aided, turbulent mixed convection in vertical pipes. This has been done by comparison of RANS predictions with DNS results already available in the literature. Both the RANS and the DNS studies were conducted for conditions of constant and uniform fluid properties with the influence of buoyancy being accounted for using the Boussinesq approximation. This eliminated effects of non-uniformity of properties other than through the action of buoyancy and enabled its influence to be considered in isolation. In the course of the study, the turbulence models have been classified into two groups, namely, those which were able to capture the main features of buoyancy-influenced heat transfer (Group one) and those that were not able to do so (Group two). Common features in model formulation have been identified for each group. It is shown that the response to buoyancy of commonly-used controlling parameters in turbulence damping functions varies significantly and that the performance of a model can largely be correlated with the type of controlling parameter used. A significant defect of the Group-one models which has been identified is that they continue to predict that the 'viscous sub-layer' remains thick as a result of the influence of buoyancy even when the velocity profile has been distorted to an extent that it has become inverted in the core, whereas DNS data clearly show that this is not the case. The use of different methodologies for modelling direct production of turbulence through the direct action of buoyancy has been shown to have little effect on predictions of mixed convection in vertical flows because the effect of buoyancy on turbulence is predominantly due to the indirect effect. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.",
keywords = "mixed convection, buoyancy, turbulence models, variable properties, direct numerical-simulation, predicting fluid-flow, heat-transfer, vertical tubes, field calculations, reattaching flows, epsilon-model, air-flows, temperature, velocity",
author = "Kim, {W. S.} and S. He and Jackson, {J. D.}",
year = "2008",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2007.12.002",
language = "English",
volume = "51",
pages = "1293--1312",
journal = "International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer",
issn = "0017-9310",
publisher = "PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD",
number = "5-6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessment by comparison with DNS data of turbulence models used in simulations of mixed convection

AU - Kim, W. S.

AU - He, S.

AU - Jackson, J. D.

PY - 2008/3

Y1 - 2008/3

N2 - The paper presents an assessment of the performance of a variety of turbulence models in simulating buoyancy-aided, turbulent mixed convection in vertical pipes. This has been done by comparison of RANS predictions with DNS results already available in the literature. Both the RANS and the DNS studies were conducted for conditions of constant and uniform fluid properties with the influence of buoyancy being accounted for using the Boussinesq approximation. This eliminated effects of non-uniformity of properties other than through the action of buoyancy and enabled its influence to be considered in isolation. In the course of the study, the turbulence models have been classified into two groups, namely, those which were able to capture the main features of buoyancy-influenced heat transfer (Group one) and those that were not able to do so (Group two). Common features in model formulation have been identified for each group. It is shown that the response to buoyancy of commonly-used controlling parameters in turbulence damping functions varies significantly and that the performance of a model can largely be correlated with the type of controlling parameter used. A significant defect of the Group-one models which has been identified is that they continue to predict that the 'viscous sub-layer' remains thick as a result of the influence of buoyancy even when the velocity profile has been distorted to an extent that it has become inverted in the core, whereas DNS data clearly show that this is not the case. The use of different methodologies for modelling direct production of turbulence through the direct action of buoyancy has been shown to have little effect on predictions of mixed convection in vertical flows because the effect of buoyancy on turbulence is predominantly due to the indirect effect. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

AB - The paper presents an assessment of the performance of a variety of turbulence models in simulating buoyancy-aided, turbulent mixed convection in vertical pipes. This has been done by comparison of RANS predictions with DNS results already available in the literature. Both the RANS and the DNS studies were conducted for conditions of constant and uniform fluid properties with the influence of buoyancy being accounted for using the Boussinesq approximation. This eliminated effects of non-uniformity of properties other than through the action of buoyancy and enabled its influence to be considered in isolation. In the course of the study, the turbulence models have been classified into two groups, namely, those which were able to capture the main features of buoyancy-influenced heat transfer (Group one) and those that were not able to do so (Group two). Common features in model formulation have been identified for each group. It is shown that the response to buoyancy of commonly-used controlling parameters in turbulence damping functions varies significantly and that the performance of a model can largely be correlated with the type of controlling parameter used. A significant defect of the Group-one models which has been identified is that they continue to predict that the 'viscous sub-layer' remains thick as a result of the influence of buoyancy even when the velocity profile has been distorted to an extent that it has become inverted in the core, whereas DNS data clearly show that this is not the case. The use of different methodologies for modelling direct production of turbulence through the direct action of buoyancy has been shown to have little effect on predictions of mixed convection in vertical flows because the effect of buoyancy on turbulence is predominantly due to the indirect effect. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

KW - mixed convection

KW - buoyancy

KW - turbulence models

KW - variable properties

KW - direct numerical-simulation

KW - predicting fluid-flow

KW - heat-transfer

KW - vertical tubes

KW - field calculations

KW - reattaching flows

KW - epsilon-model

KW - air-flows

KW - temperature

KW - velocity

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2007.12.002

DO - 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2007.12.002

M3 - Article

VL - 51

SP - 1293

EP - 1312

JO - International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer

JF - International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer

SN - 0017-9310

IS - 5-6

ER -