Assessment of airway function in young children with asthma: comparison of spirometry, interrupter technique, and tidal flow by inductance plethsmography

Julie Christine Black, A. D. Baxter-Jones, Joanna Clodagh Gordon, A. L. Findlay, Peter Joseph Benedict Helms

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

30 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The assessment of airway function in young children requires adaptation of techniques designed for adults and/or application of techniques that do not require complex respiratory maneuvers. We sought to assess two methods of measuring airway function: time to peak expiratory flows as a ratio of expiratory time (T-PTEF/T-E), derived from respiratory inductance plethysmography, and total respiratory resistance by the interrupter technique (Rint), both obtained during quiet tidal breathing. Both techniques were referenced to FEV1 and flow at 50% expired volume (FEF50) from conventional spirometry in 30 children aged 4-8 years (median age, 6.9; range, 4.5-8.5 years) with a physician diagnosis of asthma and who were able to perform FEV1 with a repeatability of at least 8%. T-PTEF/T-E and Rint were performed in random order followed by spirometry, in order to reduce the possible effects of pulmonary stretch on tidal breathing measures. Coefficients of variation (CV) and mean absolute change/baseline standard deviation were derived for each measurement. Baseline FEV1 did riot correlate significantly with T-PTEF/T-E (r= 0.025), but did correlate with Rint (r= 0.737, P < 0.001); respective relationships for change after bronchodilator were r=0.09 (ns) and r=0.64 (P < 0.001). FEF50 also correlated significantly with Rint (R = 0.769, P < 0.001) but not with T-PTEF/T-E. FEV1 and FEF50 both increased postbronchodilator, with respective mean changes of 11.4% and 28% (P < 0.001), while Rint decreased by 24.3% (P < 0.001). No significant changes were noted for T-PTEF/T-E. T-PTEF/T-E derived from inductance plethysmography does not detect mild airway obstruction or modest changes in airway caliber following bronchodilator in young children with asthma. The interrupter technique may have a role in assessing baseline airway function and response to therapy in children unable to perform reliable sprometry, and/or when the investigator wishes to avoid the possible influence of forced maneuvers on airway tone. (C) 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)548-553
Number of pages5
JournalPediatric Pulmonology
Volume37
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2004

Keywords

  • tidal breathing
  • respiratory resistance
  • interrupter technique
  • asthma
  • children
  • spirometry
  • bronchodilator response
  • FORCED EXPIRATORY MANEUVERS
  • PRESCHOOL-CHILDREN
  • RESPIRATORY-DISEASE
  • PULMONARY-FUNCTION
  • LUNG-FUNCTION
  • RESISTANCE
  • RESPONSIVENESS
  • BRONCHODILATOR
  • OBSTRUCTION
  • INFANTS

Cite this

Assessment of airway function in young children with asthma: comparison of spirometry, interrupter technique, and tidal flow by inductance plethsmography. / Black, Julie Christine; Baxter-Jones, A. D.; Gordon, Joanna Clodagh; Findlay, A. L.; Helms, Peter Joseph Benedict.

In: Pediatric Pulmonology, Vol. 37, No. 6, 2004, p. 548-553.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Black, Julie Christine ; Baxter-Jones, A. D. ; Gordon, Joanna Clodagh ; Findlay, A. L. ; Helms, Peter Joseph Benedict. / Assessment of airway function in young children with asthma: comparison of spirometry, interrupter technique, and tidal flow by inductance plethsmography. In: Pediatric Pulmonology. 2004 ; Vol. 37, No. 6. pp. 548-553.
@article{741f8c4586384c9eb4cbdd0ba31b4927,
title = "Assessment of airway function in young children with asthma: comparison of spirometry, interrupter technique, and tidal flow by inductance plethsmography",
abstract = "The assessment of airway function in young children requires adaptation of techniques designed for adults and/or application of techniques that do not require complex respiratory maneuvers. We sought to assess two methods of measuring airway function: time to peak expiratory flows as a ratio of expiratory time (T-PTEF/T-E), derived from respiratory inductance plethysmography, and total respiratory resistance by the interrupter technique (Rint), both obtained during quiet tidal breathing. Both techniques were referenced to FEV1 and flow at 50{\%} expired volume (FEF50) from conventional spirometry in 30 children aged 4-8 years (median age, 6.9; range, 4.5-8.5 years) with a physician diagnosis of asthma and who were able to perform FEV1 with a repeatability of at least 8{\%}. T-PTEF/T-E and Rint were performed in random order followed by spirometry, in order to reduce the possible effects of pulmonary stretch on tidal breathing measures. Coefficients of variation (CV) and mean absolute change/baseline standard deviation were derived for each measurement. Baseline FEV1 did riot correlate significantly with T-PTEF/T-E (r= 0.025), but did correlate with Rint (r= 0.737, P < 0.001); respective relationships for change after bronchodilator were r=0.09 (ns) and r=0.64 (P < 0.001). FEF50 also correlated significantly with Rint (R = 0.769, P < 0.001) but not with T-PTEF/T-E. FEV1 and FEF50 both increased postbronchodilator, with respective mean changes of 11.4{\%} and 28{\%} (P < 0.001), while Rint decreased by 24.3{\%} (P < 0.001). No significant changes were noted for T-PTEF/T-E. T-PTEF/T-E derived from inductance plethysmography does not detect mild airway obstruction or modest changes in airway caliber following bronchodilator in young children with asthma. The interrupter technique may have a role in assessing baseline airway function and response to therapy in children unable to perform reliable sprometry, and/or when the investigator wishes to avoid the possible influence of forced maneuvers on airway tone. (C) 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.",
keywords = "tidal breathing, respiratory resistance, interrupter technique, asthma, children, spirometry, bronchodilator response, FORCED EXPIRATORY MANEUVERS, PRESCHOOL-CHILDREN, RESPIRATORY-DISEASE, PULMONARY-FUNCTION, LUNG-FUNCTION, RESISTANCE, RESPONSIVENESS, BRONCHODILATOR, OBSTRUCTION, INFANTS",
author = "Black, {Julie Christine} and Baxter-Jones, {A. D.} and Gordon, {Joanna Clodagh} and Findlay, {A. L.} and Helms, {Peter Joseph Benedict}",
year = "2004",
doi = "10.1002/ppul.20046",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "548--553",
journal = "Pediatric Pulmonology",
issn = "8755-6863",
publisher = "John Wiley & Sons, Ltd",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessment of airway function in young children with asthma: comparison of spirometry, interrupter technique, and tidal flow by inductance plethsmography

AU - Black, Julie Christine

AU - Baxter-Jones, A. D.

AU - Gordon, Joanna Clodagh

AU - Findlay, A. L.

AU - Helms, Peter Joseph Benedict

PY - 2004

Y1 - 2004

N2 - The assessment of airway function in young children requires adaptation of techniques designed for adults and/or application of techniques that do not require complex respiratory maneuvers. We sought to assess two methods of measuring airway function: time to peak expiratory flows as a ratio of expiratory time (T-PTEF/T-E), derived from respiratory inductance plethysmography, and total respiratory resistance by the interrupter technique (Rint), both obtained during quiet tidal breathing. Both techniques were referenced to FEV1 and flow at 50% expired volume (FEF50) from conventional spirometry in 30 children aged 4-8 years (median age, 6.9; range, 4.5-8.5 years) with a physician diagnosis of asthma and who were able to perform FEV1 with a repeatability of at least 8%. T-PTEF/T-E and Rint were performed in random order followed by spirometry, in order to reduce the possible effects of pulmonary stretch on tidal breathing measures. Coefficients of variation (CV) and mean absolute change/baseline standard deviation were derived for each measurement. Baseline FEV1 did riot correlate significantly with T-PTEF/T-E (r= 0.025), but did correlate with Rint (r= 0.737, P < 0.001); respective relationships for change after bronchodilator were r=0.09 (ns) and r=0.64 (P < 0.001). FEF50 also correlated significantly with Rint (R = 0.769, P < 0.001) but not with T-PTEF/T-E. FEV1 and FEF50 both increased postbronchodilator, with respective mean changes of 11.4% and 28% (P < 0.001), while Rint decreased by 24.3% (P < 0.001). No significant changes were noted for T-PTEF/T-E. T-PTEF/T-E derived from inductance plethysmography does not detect mild airway obstruction or modest changes in airway caliber following bronchodilator in young children with asthma. The interrupter technique may have a role in assessing baseline airway function and response to therapy in children unable to perform reliable sprometry, and/or when the investigator wishes to avoid the possible influence of forced maneuvers on airway tone. (C) 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

AB - The assessment of airway function in young children requires adaptation of techniques designed for adults and/or application of techniques that do not require complex respiratory maneuvers. We sought to assess two methods of measuring airway function: time to peak expiratory flows as a ratio of expiratory time (T-PTEF/T-E), derived from respiratory inductance plethysmography, and total respiratory resistance by the interrupter technique (Rint), both obtained during quiet tidal breathing. Both techniques were referenced to FEV1 and flow at 50% expired volume (FEF50) from conventional spirometry in 30 children aged 4-8 years (median age, 6.9; range, 4.5-8.5 years) with a physician diagnosis of asthma and who were able to perform FEV1 with a repeatability of at least 8%. T-PTEF/T-E and Rint were performed in random order followed by spirometry, in order to reduce the possible effects of pulmonary stretch on tidal breathing measures. Coefficients of variation (CV) and mean absolute change/baseline standard deviation were derived for each measurement. Baseline FEV1 did riot correlate significantly with T-PTEF/T-E (r= 0.025), but did correlate with Rint (r= 0.737, P < 0.001); respective relationships for change after bronchodilator were r=0.09 (ns) and r=0.64 (P < 0.001). FEF50 also correlated significantly with Rint (R = 0.769, P < 0.001) but not with T-PTEF/T-E. FEV1 and FEF50 both increased postbronchodilator, with respective mean changes of 11.4% and 28% (P < 0.001), while Rint decreased by 24.3% (P < 0.001). No significant changes were noted for T-PTEF/T-E. T-PTEF/T-E derived from inductance plethysmography does not detect mild airway obstruction or modest changes in airway caliber following bronchodilator in young children with asthma. The interrupter technique may have a role in assessing baseline airway function and response to therapy in children unable to perform reliable sprometry, and/or when the investigator wishes to avoid the possible influence of forced maneuvers on airway tone. (C) 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

KW - tidal breathing

KW - respiratory resistance

KW - interrupter technique

KW - asthma

KW - children

KW - spirometry

KW - bronchodilator response

KW - FORCED EXPIRATORY MANEUVERS

KW - PRESCHOOL-CHILDREN

KW - RESPIRATORY-DISEASE

KW - PULMONARY-FUNCTION

KW - LUNG-FUNCTION

KW - RESISTANCE

KW - RESPONSIVENESS

KW - BRONCHODILATOR

KW - OBSTRUCTION

KW - INFANTS

U2 - 10.1002/ppul.20046

DO - 10.1002/ppul.20046

M3 - Article

VL - 37

SP - 548

EP - 553

JO - Pediatric Pulmonology

JF - Pediatric Pulmonology

SN - 8755-6863

IS - 6

ER -