Assessment of executive dysfunction

John R. Crawford*, Julie D. Henry

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This chapter focuses on the measurement properties of putative tests of executive dysfunction and on validity information. It reviews the tests ranging from long-standing clinical tests such as verbal fluency and the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test to more recent tests that are more explicitly derived from theory, such as the Cognitive Estimation Task, the Brixton and Hayling Tests, dual task methods, and the Behavioural Assessment of the Dysexecutive Syndrome (BADS). It discusses the issue of the ecological validity of tests and the need to consider a patient's premorbid ability when assessing executive functioning. It also briefly reviews the rating scales and questionnaire methods of assessing executive problems and disability. Executive deficits typically have a much more profound effect on recovery and adjustment than the more circumscribed deficits that arise from posterior lesions. However, the behavioural features of executive dysfunction have proven hard to capture formally. In keeping with the emphasis in this book on the use of quantitative evidence to guide practice, this review focuses on the measurement properties of putative tests of executive dysfunction and on validity information (e.g. data comparing anterior lesion cases with controls or posterior cases are used to calculate effect sizes for commonly used tests). The tests reviewed range from long-standing clinical tests (e.g. verbal fluency and the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test) to more recent tests that are more explicitly derived from theory, such as the Cognitive Estimation Task, the Brixton and Hayling Tests, dual task methods, and the Behavioural Assessment of the Dysexecutive Syndrome (BADS). The issue of the ecological validity of tests is discussed as is the need to consider a patient's premorbid ability when assessing executive functioning. Finally, the rating scales and questionnaire methods of assessing executive problems and disability (e.g., the DEX, PRMQ and FrSBe) are briefly reviewed.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationThe Effectiveness of Rehabilitation for Cognitive Deficits
PublisherOxford University Press (OUP)
Chapter19
Number of pages21
ISBN (Electronic)9780191689420
ISBN (Print)0198526547, 9780198526544
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 22 Mar 2012

Fingerprint

Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Anterior lesion
  • Cognitive estimation task
  • Executive deficits
  • Verbal fluency
  • Wisconsin card

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Crawford, J. R., & Henry, J. D. (2012). Assessment of executive dysfunction. In The Effectiveness of Rehabilitation for Cognitive Deficits Oxford University Press (OUP). https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198526544.003.0019

Assessment of executive dysfunction. / Crawford, John R.; Henry, Julie D.

The Effectiveness of Rehabilitation for Cognitive Deficits. Oxford University Press (OUP), 2012.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Crawford, JR & Henry, JD 2012, Assessment of executive dysfunction. in The Effectiveness of Rehabilitation for Cognitive Deficits. Oxford University Press (OUP). https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198526544.003.0019
Crawford JR, Henry JD. Assessment of executive dysfunction. In The Effectiveness of Rehabilitation for Cognitive Deficits. Oxford University Press (OUP). 2012 https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198526544.003.0019
Crawford, John R. ; Henry, Julie D. / Assessment of executive dysfunction. The Effectiveness of Rehabilitation for Cognitive Deficits. Oxford University Press (OUP), 2012.
@inbook{330312b755fd4b60acf0541efd6bd08a,
title = "Assessment of executive dysfunction",
abstract = "This chapter focuses on the measurement properties of putative tests of executive dysfunction and on validity information. It reviews the tests ranging from long-standing clinical tests such as verbal fluency and the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test to more recent tests that are more explicitly derived from theory, such as the Cognitive Estimation Task, the Brixton and Hayling Tests, dual task methods, and the Behavioural Assessment of the Dysexecutive Syndrome (BADS). It discusses the issue of the ecological validity of tests and the need to consider a patient's premorbid ability when assessing executive functioning. It also briefly reviews the rating scales and questionnaire methods of assessing executive problems and disability. Executive deficits typically have a much more profound effect on recovery and adjustment than the more circumscribed deficits that arise from posterior lesions. However, the behavioural features of executive dysfunction have proven hard to capture formally. In keeping with the emphasis in this book on the use of quantitative evidence to guide practice, this review focuses on the measurement properties of putative tests of executive dysfunction and on validity information (e.g. data comparing anterior lesion cases with controls or posterior cases are used to calculate effect sizes for commonly used tests). The tests reviewed range from long-standing clinical tests (e.g. verbal fluency and the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test) to more recent tests that are more explicitly derived from theory, such as the Cognitive Estimation Task, the Brixton and Hayling Tests, dual task methods, and the Behavioural Assessment of the Dysexecutive Syndrome (BADS). The issue of the ecological validity of tests is discussed as is the need to consider a patient's premorbid ability when assessing executive functioning. Finally, the rating scales and questionnaire methods of assessing executive problems and disability (e.g., the DEX, PRMQ and FrSBe) are briefly reviewed.",
keywords = "Anterior lesion, Cognitive estimation task, Executive deficits, Verbal fluency, Wisconsin card",
author = "Crawford, {John R.} and Henry, {Julie D.}",
year = "2012",
month = "3",
day = "22",
doi = "10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198526544.003.0019",
language = "English",
isbn = "0198526547",
booktitle = "The Effectiveness of Rehabilitation for Cognitive Deficits",
publisher = "Oxford University Press (OUP)",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Assessment of executive dysfunction

AU - Crawford, John R.

AU - Henry, Julie D.

PY - 2012/3/22

Y1 - 2012/3/22

N2 - This chapter focuses on the measurement properties of putative tests of executive dysfunction and on validity information. It reviews the tests ranging from long-standing clinical tests such as verbal fluency and the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test to more recent tests that are more explicitly derived from theory, such as the Cognitive Estimation Task, the Brixton and Hayling Tests, dual task methods, and the Behavioural Assessment of the Dysexecutive Syndrome (BADS). It discusses the issue of the ecological validity of tests and the need to consider a patient's premorbid ability when assessing executive functioning. It also briefly reviews the rating scales and questionnaire methods of assessing executive problems and disability. Executive deficits typically have a much more profound effect on recovery and adjustment than the more circumscribed deficits that arise from posterior lesions. However, the behavioural features of executive dysfunction have proven hard to capture formally. In keeping with the emphasis in this book on the use of quantitative evidence to guide practice, this review focuses on the measurement properties of putative tests of executive dysfunction and on validity information (e.g. data comparing anterior lesion cases with controls or posterior cases are used to calculate effect sizes for commonly used tests). The tests reviewed range from long-standing clinical tests (e.g. verbal fluency and the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test) to more recent tests that are more explicitly derived from theory, such as the Cognitive Estimation Task, the Brixton and Hayling Tests, dual task methods, and the Behavioural Assessment of the Dysexecutive Syndrome (BADS). The issue of the ecological validity of tests is discussed as is the need to consider a patient's premorbid ability when assessing executive functioning. Finally, the rating scales and questionnaire methods of assessing executive problems and disability (e.g., the DEX, PRMQ and FrSBe) are briefly reviewed.

AB - This chapter focuses on the measurement properties of putative tests of executive dysfunction and on validity information. It reviews the tests ranging from long-standing clinical tests such as verbal fluency and the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test to more recent tests that are more explicitly derived from theory, such as the Cognitive Estimation Task, the Brixton and Hayling Tests, dual task methods, and the Behavioural Assessment of the Dysexecutive Syndrome (BADS). It discusses the issue of the ecological validity of tests and the need to consider a patient's premorbid ability when assessing executive functioning. It also briefly reviews the rating scales and questionnaire methods of assessing executive problems and disability. Executive deficits typically have a much more profound effect on recovery and adjustment than the more circumscribed deficits that arise from posterior lesions. However, the behavioural features of executive dysfunction have proven hard to capture formally. In keeping with the emphasis in this book on the use of quantitative evidence to guide practice, this review focuses on the measurement properties of putative tests of executive dysfunction and on validity information (e.g. data comparing anterior lesion cases with controls or posterior cases are used to calculate effect sizes for commonly used tests). The tests reviewed range from long-standing clinical tests (e.g. verbal fluency and the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test) to more recent tests that are more explicitly derived from theory, such as the Cognitive Estimation Task, the Brixton and Hayling Tests, dual task methods, and the Behavioural Assessment of the Dysexecutive Syndrome (BADS). The issue of the ecological validity of tests is discussed as is the need to consider a patient's premorbid ability when assessing executive functioning. Finally, the rating scales and questionnaire methods of assessing executive problems and disability (e.g., the DEX, PRMQ and FrSBe) are briefly reviewed.

KW - Anterior lesion

KW - Cognitive estimation task

KW - Executive deficits

KW - Verbal fluency

KW - Wisconsin card

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84922761022&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198526544.003.0019

DO - 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198526544.003.0019

M3 - Chapter

SN - 0198526547

SN - 9780198526544

BT - The Effectiveness of Rehabilitation for Cognitive Deficits

PB - Oxford University Press (OUP)

ER -