Attitudes of food entrepreneurs towards two grant schemes under the first England Rural Development Programme, 2000–2006

B Ilbery, D Watts, J Little, A Gilg, S Simpson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Grant schemes introduced under the first England Rural Development Programme (ERDP) (2000–2006) have been subjected to limited academic research and this paper aims to fill this gap by examining the attitudes of food entrepreneurs in two contiguous English regions to two key elements of the ERDP: the Processing and Marketing Grant (PMG) and the Rural Enterprise Scheme (RES). It does this through a qualitative analysis of data gathered from interviews with 20 ‘adopters’ and 20 ‘non-adopters’ of the two schemes in the South West and West Midlands regions of England. The analysis reveals that, despite the rural development rhetoric, neither the PMG nor the RES was particularly effective at funding enterprises beyond the farm gate; both schemes also appeared to attract what can be described as ‘serial adopters’ and to discriminate against those without experience of applying for government grants. Nevertheless, indirectly they did provide opportunities to safeguard and expand local and regional food production, processing and retailing in the two regions.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)683–689
Number of pages7
JournalLand Use Policy
Volume27
Issue number3
Early online date2 Oct 2009
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2010

Fingerprint

entrepreneurship
rural development
entrepreneur
England
grant
food
marketing
academic research
retailing
qualitative analysis
food production
traditional foods
funding
farm
interviews
rhetoric
farms
programme
interview
experience

Keywords

  • England rural development programme
  • processing and marketing grant
  • rural enterprise scheme
  • adopters and non-adopters
  • South West and West Midlands regions of England

Cite this

Attitudes of food entrepreneurs towards two grant schemes under the first England Rural Development Programme, 2000–2006. / Ilbery, B; Watts, D; Little, J; Gilg, A; Simpson, S.

In: Land Use Policy, Vol. 27, No. 3, 07.2010, p. 683–689.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0d130df2639e4629a20d28ff9a4ec0ef,
title = "Attitudes of food entrepreneurs towards two grant schemes under the first England Rural Development Programme, 2000–2006",
abstract = "Grant schemes introduced under the first England Rural Development Programme (ERDP) (2000–2006) have been subjected to limited academic research and this paper aims to fill this gap by examining the attitudes of food entrepreneurs in two contiguous English regions to two key elements of the ERDP: the Processing and Marketing Grant (PMG) and the Rural Enterprise Scheme (RES). It does this through a qualitative analysis of data gathered from interviews with 20 ‘adopters’ and 20 ‘non-adopters’ of the two schemes in the South West and West Midlands regions of England. The analysis reveals that, despite the rural development rhetoric, neither the PMG nor the RES was particularly effective at funding enterprises beyond the farm gate; both schemes also appeared to attract what can be described as ‘serial adopters’ and to discriminate against those without experience of applying for government grants. Nevertheless, indirectly they did provide opportunities to safeguard and expand local and regional food production, processing and retailing in the two regions.",
keywords = "England rural development programme, processing and marketing grant, rural enterprise scheme, adopters and non-adopters, South West and West Midlands regions of England",
author = "B Ilbery and D Watts and J Little and A Gilg and S Simpson",
year = "2010",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.09.002",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "683–689",
journal = "Land Use Policy",
issn = "0264-8377",
publisher = "ELSEVIER APPL SCI PUBL LTD",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Attitudes of food entrepreneurs towards two grant schemes under the first England Rural Development Programme, 2000–2006

AU - Ilbery, B

AU - Watts, D

AU - Little, J

AU - Gilg, A

AU - Simpson, S

PY - 2010/7

Y1 - 2010/7

N2 - Grant schemes introduced under the first England Rural Development Programme (ERDP) (2000–2006) have been subjected to limited academic research and this paper aims to fill this gap by examining the attitudes of food entrepreneurs in two contiguous English regions to two key elements of the ERDP: the Processing and Marketing Grant (PMG) and the Rural Enterprise Scheme (RES). It does this through a qualitative analysis of data gathered from interviews with 20 ‘adopters’ and 20 ‘non-adopters’ of the two schemes in the South West and West Midlands regions of England. The analysis reveals that, despite the rural development rhetoric, neither the PMG nor the RES was particularly effective at funding enterprises beyond the farm gate; both schemes also appeared to attract what can be described as ‘serial adopters’ and to discriminate against those without experience of applying for government grants. Nevertheless, indirectly they did provide opportunities to safeguard and expand local and regional food production, processing and retailing in the two regions.

AB - Grant schemes introduced under the first England Rural Development Programme (ERDP) (2000–2006) have been subjected to limited academic research and this paper aims to fill this gap by examining the attitudes of food entrepreneurs in two contiguous English regions to two key elements of the ERDP: the Processing and Marketing Grant (PMG) and the Rural Enterprise Scheme (RES). It does this through a qualitative analysis of data gathered from interviews with 20 ‘adopters’ and 20 ‘non-adopters’ of the two schemes in the South West and West Midlands regions of England. The analysis reveals that, despite the rural development rhetoric, neither the PMG nor the RES was particularly effective at funding enterprises beyond the farm gate; both schemes also appeared to attract what can be described as ‘serial adopters’ and to discriminate against those without experience of applying for government grants. Nevertheless, indirectly they did provide opportunities to safeguard and expand local and regional food production, processing and retailing in the two regions.

KW - England rural development programme

KW - processing and marketing grant

KW - rural enterprise scheme

KW - adopters and non-adopters

KW - South West and West Midlands regions of England

U2 - 10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.09.002

DO - 10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.09.002

M3 - Article

VL - 27

SP - 683

EP - 689

JO - Land Use Policy

JF - Land Use Policy

SN - 0264-8377

IS - 3

ER -