Attributions of Responsibility: Rural Neoliberalism and Farmers' Explanations of the Australian Rural Crisis

Darren Halpin, A. Guilfoyle

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Many farmers struggle to maintain farm viability amidst the ongoing commitment to a trade liberal paradigm in Australian agricultural policy. Significantly, governmental neoliberal discourses insist on Australian farmers taking personal responsibility and control for any socio-economic hardship or farm viability problems they face and down play structural explanations. In this article we argue that the neoliberal discursive environment creates the potential for self-blame where farmers 'fail'. To investigate this argument, open-ended responses from a survey of farmers in a NSW rural local government area were examined using coding categories of attribution theory from social psychology. The analysis identifies how individual farmers have borrowed from these discourses and the extent to which the attributions these discourses encapsulate are replicated, transformed or contested. Areas for future research, including impacts of attributions on psychological health and political mobilisation, are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)93-111
Number of pages18
JournalRural Society
Volume14
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2004

Fingerprint

neoliberalism
viability
farm
agricultural policy
local government
mobilization
responsibility
Farmers
Neoliberalism
Attribution
Responsibility
Discourse
social psychology
socioeconomics
analysis
health
personal responsibility

Cite this

Attributions of Responsibility : Rural Neoliberalism and Farmers' Explanations of the Australian Rural Crisis. / Halpin, Darren; Guilfoyle, A.

In: Rural Society, Vol. 14, No. 2, 06.2004, p. 93-111.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{880e690574b34474966d6772e9c3ef03,
title = "Attributions of Responsibility: Rural Neoliberalism and Farmers' Explanations of the Australian Rural Crisis",
abstract = "Many farmers struggle to maintain farm viability amidst the ongoing commitment to a trade liberal paradigm in Australian agricultural policy. Significantly, governmental neoliberal discourses insist on Australian farmers taking personal responsibility and control for any socio-economic hardship or farm viability problems they face and down play structural explanations. In this article we argue that the neoliberal discursive environment creates the potential for self-blame where farmers 'fail'. To investigate this argument, open-ended responses from a survey of farmers in a NSW rural local government area were examined using coding categories of attribution theory from social psychology. The analysis identifies how individual farmers have borrowed from these discourses and the extent to which the attributions these discourses encapsulate are replicated, transformed or contested. Areas for future research, including impacts of attributions on psychological health and political mobilisation, are discussed.",
author = "Darren Halpin and A. Guilfoyle",
year = "2004",
month = "6",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "93--111",
journal = "Rural Society",
issn = "1037-1656",
publisher = "eContent Management Pty Ltd",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Attributions of Responsibility

T2 - Rural Neoliberalism and Farmers' Explanations of the Australian Rural Crisis

AU - Halpin, Darren

AU - Guilfoyle, A.

PY - 2004/6

Y1 - 2004/6

N2 - Many farmers struggle to maintain farm viability amidst the ongoing commitment to a trade liberal paradigm in Australian agricultural policy. Significantly, governmental neoliberal discourses insist on Australian farmers taking personal responsibility and control for any socio-economic hardship or farm viability problems they face and down play structural explanations. In this article we argue that the neoliberal discursive environment creates the potential for self-blame where farmers 'fail'. To investigate this argument, open-ended responses from a survey of farmers in a NSW rural local government area were examined using coding categories of attribution theory from social psychology. The analysis identifies how individual farmers have borrowed from these discourses and the extent to which the attributions these discourses encapsulate are replicated, transformed or contested. Areas for future research, including impacts of attributions on psychological health and political mobilisation, are discussed.

AB - Many farmers struggle to maintain farm viability amidst the ongoing commitment to a trade liberal paradigm in Australian agricultural policy. Significantly, governmental neoliberal discourses insist on Australian farmers taking personal responsibility and control for any socio-economic hardship or farm viability problems they face and down play structural explanations. In this article we argue that the neoliberal discursive environment creates the potential for self-blame where farmers 'fail'. To investigate this argument, open-ended responses from a survey of farmers in a NSW rural local government area were examined using coding categories of attribution theory from social psychology. The analysis identifies how individual farmers have borrowed from these discourses and the extent to which the attributions these discourses encapsulate are replicated, transformed or contested. Areas for future research, including impacts of attributions on psychological health and political mobilisation, are discussed.

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 93

EP - 111

JO - Rural Society

JF - Rural Society

SN - 1037-1656

IS - 2

ER -