Audit and feedback with or without training in-practice targeting antibiotic prescribing (TiPTAP): a study protocol of a cluster randomised trial in dental primary care

Beatriz Goulao* (Corresponding Author), Claire L. Scott, Irene Black, Jan Clarkson, Lee McArthur, Craig Ramsay, Linda Young, Eilidh Duncan

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)
2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background
Antimicrobial resistance is an increasingly serious threat to global public health and patient safety. Overuse of antibiotics has aggravated this issue. Around 7% of all antibiotics in Scotland are prescribed by dentists. Audit and feedback has been shown to decrease these prescriptions, but there is evidence that dentists still prescribe unnecessarily. Our aim is to compare the effectiveness of a theory-informed in-practice training session (TiPTAP) in addition to individualised audit and feedback, with audit and feedback alone for reducing antibiotic prescribing by NHS dentists working in NHS primary care dental practices.

Methods
We will conduct a 2-arm parallel cluster randomised trial: out of 228 practices, 114 will be randomised to the theory-informed in-practice training session targeting antibiotic prescribing and individualised audit and feedback; 114 practices will be randomised to audit and feedback alone. The theory-informed session will include (a) an introductory session including several behaviour change techniques; (b) problem solving discussion, setting and recording action plans; (c) practice-level prescribing feedback discussion. The primary outcome is the number of antibiotic items per 100 NHS treatment claims over a 1-year period post-randomisation for each dentist. Secondary outcomes are the number of amoxicillin 3 g and broad spectrum antibiotics prescribed per 100 NHS treatment claims over a 1-year period; amoxicillin 3 g and broad spectrum antibiotics defined daily doses of antibiotics per 100 claims. Process measures include fidelity, knowledge, and confidence. Primary and secondary outcomes will be obtained using routine data.

Discussion
This study provides the opportunity to robustly assess the effect of adding an in-practice training co-intervention to audit and feedback. Its behaviour change theory-informed content will allow replication of the different components and can inform future training interventions.

Trial registration
ISRCTN, ISRCTN12345678. Registered 18 June 2020.
Original languageEnglish
Article number32
Number of pages9
JournalImplementation Science
Volume16
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 Mar 2021

Bibliographical note

Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank all the dentists and dental team members who are participating in the TiPTAP Trial, as well as the wider QliPT who will ensure the delivery of the intervention.

Sponsorship
NHS Education for Scotland is the sponsor for the study. NHS Education Scotland will have no role in the design, conduct and analysis of the trial.

Funding
The study is funded by NHS Education for Scotland.

Keywords

  • Audit and feedback
  • Cluster randomised trial
  • Quality improvement
  • Implementation
  • Antibiotic prescription

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Audit and feedback with or without training in-practice targeting antibiotic prescribing (TiPTAP): a study protocol of a cluster randomised trial in dental primary care'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this