Authors' reply re: Cerebroplacental ratio in predicting adverse perinatal outcome: a meta-analysis of individual participant data

Charlotte A. Vollgraff Heidweiller-Schreurs*, Ivy R. van Osch, Martijn W. Heymans, Wessel Ganzevoort, Linda J. Schoonmade, Caroline J. Bax, Ben Willem J. Mol, Christianne J.M. de Groot, Patrick M.M. Bossuyt, Marjon A. de Boer

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalLetter

Abstract

Morales‐Rosello et al1, 2 commented on our recent publication in BJOG, on the added value of cerebroplacental ratio (CPR) in predicting adverse perinatal outcome (APO). The conclusion of our meta‐analysis based on individual patient data (IPD) of 18 731 women was that CPR added no predictive value to the umbilical artery pulsatility index for the primary outcome: a composite adverse perinatal outcome, defined as perinatal death, caesarean section for fetal distress or neonatal unit admission.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1439-1440
Number of pages2
JournalBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Volume127
Issue number11
Early online date20 Jul 2020
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 20 Jul 2020

Keywords

  • Female
  • Humans
  • Pregnancy
  • Ultrasonography, Prenatal
  • Umbilical Arteries

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Authors' reply re: Cerebroplacental ratio in predicting adverse perinatal outcome: a meta-analysis of individual participant data'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Vollgraff Heidweiller-Schreurs, C. A., van Osch, I. R., Heymans, M. W., Ganzevoort, W., Schoonmade, L. J., Bax, C. J., Mol, BW. J., de Groot, C. J. M., Bossuyt, P. M. M., & de Boer, M. A. (2020). Authors' reply re: Cerebroplacental ratio in predicting adverse perinatal outcome: a meta-analysis of individual participant data. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 127(11), 1439-1440. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.16375