Autonomous Movement and the Institutional Left

Two Approaches in Tension in Madrid's Anti-globalization Network

Cristina Maria Flesher Fominaya

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

35 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper explores the configuration of the anti-globalization movement network in Madrid. It identifies a central tension between two different approaches to political practice, which fall along autonomous/institutional lines. Despite ideological heterogeneity and frame convergence on both sides of this 'divide', the differences in approach to political practice create real tensions when these groups attempt to work together. These tensions have recently become visible at the European Social Forums (ESFs), and are often superficially treated as a difference between 'horizontals' and 'verticals'. Through an analysis of these tensions with the use of data drawn from ethnographic fieldwork conducted in Madrid from 2002 to 2005, I argue that autonomous groups in Madrid benefit from a discursive legitimacy gained from the centrality of autonomous principles in the global movement, but that they are still dependent on institutional left organizations for crucial resources.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)335-358
Number of pages24
JournalSouth European Society & Politics
Volume12
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2007

Fingerprint

globalization
legitimacy
Group
resources

Keywords

  • autonomous movements
  • Spain
  • politics
  • social movements
  • global justice movement
  • autonomy
  • anti-globalization
  • Western European politics

Cite this

Autonomous Movement and the Institutional Left : Two Approaches in Tension in Madrid's Anti-globalization Network. / Flesher Fominaya, Cristina Maria.

In: South European Society & Politics, Vol. 12, No. 3, 09.2007, p. 335-358.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3f38749389ce4cf88df17c38086fec92,
title = "Autonomous Movement and the Institutional Left: Two Approaches in Tension in Madrid's Anti-globalization Network",
abstract = "This paper explores the configuration of the anti-globalization movement network in Madrid. It identifies a central tension between two different approaches to political practice, which fall along autonomous/institutional lines. Despite ideological heterogeneity and frame convergence on both sides of this 'divide', the differences in approach to political practice create real tensions when these groups attempt to work together. These tensions have recently become visible at the European Social Forums (ESFs), and are often superficially treated as a difference between 'horizontals' and 'verticals'. Through an analysis of these tensions with the use of data drawn from ethnographic fieldwork conducted in Madrid from 2002 to 2005, I argue that autonomous groups in Madrid benefit from a discursive legitimacy gained from the centrality of autonomous principles in the global movement, but that they are still dependent on institutional left organizations for crucial resources.",
keywords = "autonomous movements , Spain, politics, social movements, global justice movement, autonomy, anti-globalization, Western European politics",
author = "{Flesher Fominaya}, {Cristina Maria}",
year = "2007",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1080/13608740701495202",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "335--358",
journal = "South European Society & Politics",
issn = "1360-8746",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Autonomous Movement and the Institutional Left

T2 - Two Approaches in Tension in Madrid's Anti-globalization Network

AU - Flesher Fominaya, Cristina Maria

PY - 2007/9

Y1 - 2007/9

N2 - This paper explores the configuration of the anti-globalization movement network in Madrid. It identifies a central tension between two different approaches to political practice, which fall along autonomous/institutional lines. Despite ideological heterogeneity and frame convergence on both sides of this 'divide', the differences in approach to political practice create real tensions when these groups attempt to work together. These tensions have recently become visible at the European Social Forums (ESFs), and are often superficially treated as a difference between 'horizontals' and 'verticals'. Through an analysis of these tensions with the use of data drawn from ethnographic fieldwork conducted in Madrid from 2002 to 2005, I argue that autonomous groups in Madrid benefit from a discursive legitimacy gained from the centrality of autonomous principles in the global movement, but that they are still dependent on institutional left organizations for crucial resources.

AB - This paper explores the configuration of the anti-globalization movement network in Madrid. It identifies a central tension between two different approaches to political practice, which fall along autonomous/institutional lines. Despite ideological heterogeneity and frame convergence on both sides of this 'divide', the differences in approach to political practice create real tensions when these groups attempt to work together. These tensions have recently become visible at the European Social Forums (ESFs), and are often superficially treated as a difference between 'horizontals' and 'verticals'. Through an analysis of these tensions with the use of data drawn from ethnographic fieldwork conducted in Madrid from 2002 to 2005, I argue that autonomous groups in Madrid benefit from a discursive legitimacy gained from the centrality of autonomous principles in the global movement, but that they are still dependent on institutional left organizations for crucial resources.

KW - autonomous movements

KW - Spain

KW - politics

KW - social movements

KW - global justice movement

KW - autonomy

KW - anti-globalization

KW - Western European politics

U2 - 10.1080/13608740701495202

DO - 10.1080/13608740701495202

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 335

EP - 358

JO - South European Society & Politics

JF - South European Society & Politics

SN - 1360-8746

IS - 3

ER -