Autonomy and Due Process in Arbitration: Recalibrating the Balance

Henrika Christina Roodt

Research output: Contribution to specialist publicationArticle

Abstract

Conflicts of jurisdiction between a state court and an arbitral tribunal occur in two different scenarios: (a) claimant X institutes a court action and the defendant subsequently commences with arbitration or requests to be referred to arbitration (as envisaged by the 1958 New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards – NYC); and (b) claimant X commences arbitration and the defendant subsequently challenges in a national court. X should be able to seek a stay of the parallel litigation on the ground of the existence of a valid agreement to arbitrate the dispute, but the duty on the part of South African courts to do so is not clearly legislated, nor is it as well-understood as it deserves to be. Various interests have fallen into disharmony in this area of the law.


Original languageEnglish
Volume3-4
Specialist publicationEuropean Journal of Law Reform
Publication statusPublished - 2011

Fingerprint

arbitration
autonomy
jurisdiction
scenario
Law

Cite this

Autonomy and Due Process in Arbitration : Recalibrating the Balance. / Roodt, Henrika Christina.

In: European Journal of Law Reform, Vol. 3-4, 2011.

Research output: Contribution to specialist publicationArticle

@misc{f041f55434074d76b3e66ed27860a399,
title = "Autonomy and Due Process in Arbitration: Recalibrating the Balance",
abstract = "Conflicts of jurisdiction between a state court and an arbitral tribunal occur in two different scenarios: (a) claimant X institutes a court action and the defendant subsequently commences with arbitration or requests to be referred to arbitration (as envisaged by the 1958 New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards – NYC); and (b) claimant X commences arbitration and the defendant subsequently challenges in a national court. X should be able to seek a stay of the parallel litigation on the ground of the existence of a valid agreement to arbitrate the dispute, but the duty on the part of South African courts to do so is not clearly legislated, nor is it as well-understood as it deserves to be. Various interests have fallen into disharmony in this area of the law.",
author = "Roodt, {Henrika Christina}",
year = "2011",
language = "English",
volume = "3-4",
journal = "European Journal of Law Reform",
issn = "1387-2370",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Autonomy and Due Process in Arbitration

T2 - Recalibrating the Balance

AU - Roodt, Henrika Christina

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Conflicts of jurisdiction between a state court and an arbitral tribunal occur in two different scenarios: (a) claimant X institutes a court action and the defendant subsequently commences with arbitration or requests to be referred to arbitration (as envisaged by the 1958 New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards – NYC); and (b) claimant X commences arbitration and the defendant subsequently challenges in a national court. X should be able to seek a stay of the parallel litigation on the ground of the existence of a valid agreement to arbitrate the dispute, but the duty on the part of South African courts to do so is not clearly legislated, nor is it as well-understood as it deserves to be. Various interests have fallen into disharmony in this area of the law.

AB - Conflicts of jurisdiction between a state court and an arbitral tribunal occur in two different scenarios: (a) claimant X institutes a court action and the defendant subsequently commences with arbitration or requests to be referred to arbitration (as envisaged by the 1958 New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards – NYC); and (b) claimant X commences arbitration and the defendant subsequently challenges in a national court. X should be able to seek a stay of the parallel litigation on the ground of the existence of a valid agreement to arbitrate the dispute, but the duty on the part of South African courts to do so is not clearly legislated, nor is it as well-understood as it deserves to be. Various interests have fallen into disharmony in this area of the law.

M3 - Article

VL - 3-4

JO - European Journal of Law Reform

JF - European Journal of Law Reform

SN - 1387-2370

ER -