Back pain, disability, and radiographic vertebral fracture in European women: a prospective study

T W O'Neill, W Cockerill, C Matthis, H H Raspe, M Lunt, C Cooper, D Banzer, J B Cannata, M Naves, B Felsch, D Felsenberg, J Janott, O Johnell, J A Kanis, G Kragl, A L Vaz, G Lyritis, P Masaryk, G Poor, D M ReidW Reisinger, C Scheidt-Nave, J J Stepan, C J Todd, A D Woolf, J Reeve, A J Silman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

95 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Vertebral fractures are associated with back pain and disability. There are, however, few prospective data looking at back pain and disability following identification of radiographic vertebral fracture. The aim of this analysis was to determine the impact of radiographically identified vertebral fracture on the subsequent occurrence of back pain and disability. Women aged 50 years and over were recruited from population registers in 18 European centers for participation in the European Prospective Osteoporosis Study. Participants completed an interviewer-administered questionnaire which included questions about back pain in the past year and various activities of daily living, and they had lateral spine radiographs performed. Participants in these centers were followed prospectively and had repeat spine radiographs performed a mean of 3.7 years later. In addition they completed a questionnaire with the same baseline questions concerning back pain and activities of daily living. The presence of prevalent and incident vertebral fracture was defined using established morphometric criteria. The data were analyzed using logistic regression with back pain or disability (present or absent) at follow-up as the outcome variable with adjustment made for the baseline value of the variable. The study included 2,260 women, mean age 62.2 years. The mean time between baseline and follow-up survey was 5.0 years. Two hundred and forty participants had prevalent fractures at the baseline survey, and 85 developed incident fractures during follow-up. After adjustment for age, center, and the baseline level of disability, compared with those without baseline prevalent fracture, those with a prevalent fracture (odds ratio [OR]=1.4; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.0 to 2.0) or an incident fracture (OR=1.7; 95% CI, 0.9 to 3.2) were more likely to report disability at follow-up, though the confidence intervals embraced unity. Those with both a prevalent and incident fracture, however, were significantly more likely to report disability at follow-up (OR=3.1; 95% CI, 1.4 to 7.0). After adjustment for age, center, and frequency of back pain at baseline, compared with those without baseline vertebral fracture, those with a prevalent fracture were no more likely to report back pain at follow-up (OR=1.2; 95%CI, 0.8 to 1.7). There was a small increased risk among those with a preexisting fracture who had sustained an incident fracture during follow-up (OR=1.6; 95%CI, 0.6 to 4.1) though the confidence intervals embraced unity. In conclusion, although there was no significant increase in the level of back pain an average of 5 years following identification of radiographic vertebral fracture, women who suffered a further fracture during follow-up experienced substantial levels of disability with impairment in key physical functions of independent living.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)760-765
Number of pages6
JournalOsteoporosis International
Volume15
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2004

Keywords

  • back pain
  • disability
  • prospective study
  • vertebral fracture
  • QUALITY-OF-LIFE
  • FUNCTIONAL IMPAIRMENT
  • OSTEOPOROSIS
  • DEFORMITIES
  • POPULATION
  • ASSOCIATION
  • PREDICTORS
  • MEN

Cite this

O'Neill, T. W., Cockerill, W., Matthis, C., Raspe, H. H., Lunt, M., Cooper, C., ... Silman, A. J. (2004). Back pain, disability, and radiographic vertebral fracture in European women: a prospective study. Osteoporosis International, 15, 760-765. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-004-1615-4

Back pain, disability, and radiographic vertebral fracture in European women: a prospective study. / O'Neill, T W ; Cockerill, W ; Matthis, C ; Raspe, H H ; Lunt, M ; Cooper, C ; Banzer, D ; Cannata, J B ; Naves, M ; Felsch, B ; Felsenberg, D ; Janott, J ; Johnell, O ; Kanis, J A ; Kragl, G ; Vaz, A L ; Lyritis, G ; Masaryk, P ; Poor, G ; Reid, D M ; Reisinger, W ; Scheidt-Nave, C ; Stepan, J J ; Todd, C J ; Woolf, A D ; Reeve, J ; Silman, A J .

In: Osteoporosis International, Vol. 15, 2004, p. 760-765.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

O'Neill, TW, Cockerill, W, Matthis, C, Raspe, HH, Lunt, M, Cooper, C, Banzer, D, Cannata, JB, Naves, M, Felsch, B, Felsenberg, D, Janott, J, Johnell, O, Kanis, JA, Kragl, G, Vaz, AL, Lyritis, G, Masaryk, P, Poor, G, Reid, DM, Reisinger, W, Scheidt-Nave, C, Stepan, JJ, Todd, CJ, Woolf, AD, Reeve, J & Silman, AJ 2004, 'Back pain, disability, and radiographic vertebral fracture in European women: a prospective study', Osteoporosis International, vol. 15, pp. 760-765. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-004-1615-4
O'Neill, T W ; Cockerill, W ; Matthis, C ; Raspe, H H ; Lunt, M ; Cooper, C ; Banzer, D ; Cannata, J B ; Naves, M ; Felsch, B ; Felsenberg, D ; Janott, J ; Johnell, O ; Kanis, J A ; Kragl, G ; Vaz, A L ; Lyritis, G ; Masaryk, P ; Poor, G ; Reid, D M ; Reisinger, W ; Scheidt-Nave, C ; Stepan, J J ; Todd, C J ; Woolf, A D ; Reeve, J ; Silman, A J . / Back pain, disability, and radiographic vertebral fracture in European women: a prospective study. In: Osteoporosis International. 2004 ; Vol. 15. pp. 760-765.
@article{7b644ea6f67541849e2de81888c39694,
title = "Back pain, disability, and radiographic vertebral fracture in European women: a prospective study",
abstract = "Vertebral fractures are associated with back pain and disability. There are, however, few prospective data looking at back pain and disability following identification of radiographic vertebral fracture. The aim of this analysis was to determine the impact of radiographically identified vertebral fracture on the subsequent occurrence of back pain and disability. Women aged 50 years and over were recruited from population registers in 18 European centers for participation in the European Prospective Osteoporosis Study. Participants completed an interviewer-administered questionnaire which included questions about back pain in the past year and various activities of daily living, and they had lateral spine radiographs performed. Participants in these centers were followed prospectively and had repeat spine radiographs performed a mean of 3.7 years later. In addition they completed a questionnaire with the same baseline questions concerning back pain and activities of daily living. The presence of prevalent and incident vertebral fracture was defined using established morphometric criteria. The data were analyzed using logistic regression with back pain or disability (present or absent) at follow-up as the outcome variable with adjustment made for the baseline value of the variable. The study included 2,260 women, mean age 62.2 years. The mean time between baseline and follow-up survey was 5.0 years. Two hundred and forty participants had prevalent fractures at the baseline survey, and 85 developed incident fractures during follow-up. After adjustment for age, center, and the baseline level of disability, compared with those without baseline prevalent fracture, those with a prevalent fracture (odds ratio [OR]=1.4; 95{\%} confidence interval [CI] 1.0 to 2.0) or an incident fracture (OR=1.7; 95{\%} CI, 0.9 to 3.2) were more likely to report disability at follow-up, though the confidence intervals embraced unity. Those with both a prevalent and incident fracture, however, were significantly more likely to report disability at follow-up (OR=3.1; 95{\%} CI, 1.4 to 7.0). After adjustment for age, center, and frequency of back pain at baseline, compared with those without baseline vertebral fracture, those with a prevalent fracture were no more likely to report back pain at follow-up (OR=1.2; 95{\%}CI, 0.8 to 1.7). There was a small increased risk among those with a preexisting fracture who had sustained an incident fracture during follow-up (OR=1.6; 95{\%}CI, 0.6 to 4.1) though the confidence intervals embraced unity. In conclusion, although there was no significant increase in the level of back pain an average of 5 years following identification of radiographic vertebral fracture, women who suffered a further fracture during follow-up experienced substantial levels of disability with impairment in key physical functions of independent living.",
keywords = "back pain, disability, prospective study, vertebral fracture, QUALITY-OF-LIFE, FUNCTIONAL IMPAIRMENT, OSTEOPOROSIS, DEFORMITIES, POPULATION, ASSOCIATION, PREDICTORS, MEN",
author = "O'Neill, {T W} and W Cockerill and C Matthis and Raspe, {H H} and M Lunt and C Cooper and D Banzer and Cannata, {J B} and M Naves and B Felsch and D Felsenberg and J Janott and O Johnell and Kanis, {J A} and G Kragl and Vaz, {A L} and G Lyritis and P Masaryk and G Poor and Reid, {D M} and W Reisinger and C Scheidt-Nave and Stepan, {J J} and Todd, {C J} and Woolf, {A D} and J Reeve and Silman, {A J}",
year = "2004",
doi = "10.1007/s00198-004-1615-4",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "760--765",
journal = "Osteoporosis International",
issn = "0937-941X",
publisher = "SPRINGER-VERLAG LONDON LTD",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Back pain, disability, and radiographic vertebral fracture in European women: a prospective study

AU - O'Neill, T W

AU - Cockerill, W

AU - Matthis, C

AU - Raspe, H H

AU - Lunt, M

AU - Cooper, C

AU - Banzer, D

AU - Cannata, J B

AU - Naves, M

AU - Felsch, B

AU - Felsenberg, D

AU - Janott, J

AU - Johnell, O

AU - Kanis, J A

AU - Kragl, G

AU - Vaz, A L

AU - Lyritis, G

AU - Masaryk, P

AU - Poor, G

AU - Reid, D M

AU - Reisinger, W

AU - Scheidt-Nave, C

AU - Stepan, J J

AU - Todd, C J

AU - Woolf, A D

AU - Reeve, J

AU - Silman, A J

PY - 2004

Y1 - 2004

N2 - Vertebral fractures are associated with back pain and disability. There are, however, few prospective data looking at back pain and disability following identification of radiographic vertebral fracture. The aim of this analysis was to determine the impact of radiographically identified vertebral fracture on the subsequent occurrence of back pain and disability. Women aged 50 years and over were recruited from population registers in 18 European centers for participation in the European Prospective Osteoporosis Study. Participants completed an interviewer-administered questionnaire which included questions about back pain in the past year and various activities of daily living, and they had lateral spine radiographs performed. Participants in these centers were followed prospectively and had repeat spine radiographs performed a mean of 3.7 years later. In addition they completed a questionnaire with the same baseline questions concerning back pain and activities of daily living. The presence of prevalent and incident vertebral fracture was defined using established morphometric criteria. The data were analyzed using logistic regression with back pain or disability (present or absent) at follow-up as the outcome variable with adjustment made for the baseline value of the variable. The study included 2,260 women, mean age 62.2 years. The mean time between baseline and follow-up survey was 5.0 years. Two hundred and forty participants had prevalent fractures at the baseline survey, and 85 developed incident fractures during follow-up. After adjustment for age, center, and the baseline level of disability, compared with those without baseline prevalent fracture, those with a prevalent fracture (odds ratio [OR]=1.4; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.0 to 2.0) or an incident fracture (OR=1.7; 95% CI, 0.9 to 3.2) were more likely to report disability at follow-up, though the confidence intervals embraced unity. Those with both a prevalent and incident fracture, however, were significantly more likely to report disability at follow-up (OR=3.1; 95% CI, 1.4 to 7.0). After adjustment for age, center, and frequency of back pain at baseline, compared with those without baseline vertebral fracture, those with a prevalent fracture were no more likely to report back pain at follow-up (OR=1.2; 95%CI, 0.8 to 1.7). There was a small increased risk among those with a preexisting fracture who had sustained an incident fracture during follow-up (OR=1.6; 95%CI, 0.6 to 4.1) though the confidence intervals embraced unity. In conclusion, although there was no significant increase in the level of back pain an average of 5 years following identification of radiographic vertebral fracture, women who suffered a further fracture during follow-up experienced substantial levels of disability with impairment in key physical functions of independent living.

AB - Vertebral fractures are associated with back pain and disability. There are, however, few prospective data looking at back pain and disability following identification of radiographic vertebral fracture. The aim of this analysis was to determine the impact of radiographically identified vertebral fracture on the subsequent occurrence of back pain and disability. Women aged 50 years and over were recruited from population registers in 18 European centers for participation in the European Prospective Osteoporosis Study. Participants completed an interviewer-administered questionnaire which included questions about back pain in the past year and various activities of daily living, and they had lateral spine radiographs performed. Participants in these centers were followed prospectively and had repeat spine radiographs performed a mean of 3.7 years later. In addition they completed a questionnaire with the same baseline questions concerning back pain and activities of daily living. The presence of prevalent and incident vertebral fracture was defined using established morphometric criteria. The data were analyzed using logistic regression with back pain or disability (present or absent) at follow-up as the outcome variable with adjustment made for the baseline value of the variable. The study included 2,260 women, mean age 62.2 years. The mean time between baseline and follow-up survey was 5.0 years. Two hundred and forty participants had prevalent fractures at the baseline survey, and 85 developed incident fractures during follow-up. After adjustment for age, center, and the baseline level of disability, compared with those without baseline prevalent fracture, those with a prevalent fracture (odds ratio [OR]=1.4; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.0 to 2.0) or an incident fracture (OR=1.7; 95% CI, 0.9 to 3.2) were more likely to report disability at follow-up, though the confidence intervals embraced unity. Those with both a prevalent and incident fracture, however, were significantly more likely to report disability at follow-up (OR=3.1; 95% CI, 1.4 to 7.0). After adjustment for age, center, and frequency of back pain at baseline, compared with those without baseline vertebral fracture, those with a prevalent fracture were no more likely to report back pain at follow-up (OR=1.2; 95%CI, 0.8 to 1.7). There was a small increased risk among those with a preexisting fracture who had sustained an incident fracture during follow-up (OR=1.6; 95%CI, 0.6 to 4.1) though the confidence intervals embraced unity. In conclusion, although there was no significant increase in the level of back pain an average of 5 years following identification of radiographic vertebral fracture, women who suffered a further fracture during follow-up experienced substantial levels of disability with impairment in key physical functions of independent living.

KW - back pain

KW - disability

KW - prospective study

KW - vertebral fracture

KW - QUALITY-OF-LIFE

KW - FUNCTIONAL IMPAIRMENT

KW - OSTEOPOROSIS

KW - DEFORMITIES

KW - POPULATION

KW - ASSOCIATION

KW - PREDICTORS

KW - MEN

U2 - 10.1007/s00198-004-1615-4

DO - 10.1007/s00198-004-1615-4

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 760

EP - 765

JO - Osteoporosis International

JF - Osteoporosis International

SN - 0937-941X

ER -