Balancing positive and negative plant interactions: how mosses structure vascular plant communities

Jemma L. Gornall, Sarah J. Woodin, Ingibjorg S. Jonsdottir, Rene van der Wal

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

41 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Our understanding of positive and negative plant interactions is primarily based on vascular plants, as is the prediction that facilitative eVects dominate in harsh
environments. It remains unclear whether this understanding is also applicable to moss–vascular plant interactions, which are likely to be inXuential in low-temperature environments with extensive moss ground cover such as boreal
forest and arctic tundra. In a Weld experiment in high-arctic tundra, we investigated positive and negative impacts of the moss layer on vascular plants. Ramets of the shrub Salix polaris, herb Bistorta vivipara, grass Alopecurus borealis and rush Luzula confusa were transplanted into plots manipulated to contain bare soil, shallow moss (3 cm) and deep moss (6 cm) and harvested after three growing seasons. The moss layer had both positive and negative
impacts upon vascular plant growth, the relative extent of which varied among vascular plant species. Deep moss cover reduced soil temperature and nitrogen availability, and this was reXected in reduced graminoid productivity. Shrub and herb biomass were greatest in shallow moss, where soil moisture also appeared to be highest. The relative importance of the mechanisms by which moss may
inXuence vascular plants, through eVects on soil temperature, moisture and nitrogen availability, was investigated in a phytotron growth experiment. Soil temperature, and not nutrient availability, determined Alopecurus growth,
whereas Salix only responded to increased temperature if soil nitrogen was also increased. We propose a conceptual model showing the relative importance of positive and negative inXuences of the moss mat on vascular plants along a
gradient of moss depth and illustrate species-speciWc outcomes. Our Wndings suggest that, through their strong inXuence on the soil environment, mat-forming mosses structure the composition of vascular plant communities. Thus, for plant interaction theory to be widely applicable to extreme environments such as the Arctic, growth forms other than vascular plants should be considered.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)769-782
Number of pages14
JournalOecologia
Volume166
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2011

Fingerprint

vascular plant
vascular plants
moss
mosses and liverworts
plant community
plant communities
soil temperature
Alopecurus
tundra
Salix
soil nitrogen
herb
herbs
nitrogen
Bistorta vivipara
shrub
shrubs
Juncaceae
Luzula
ground cover

Keywords

  • competition
  • facilitation
  • high-arctic
  • nutrient availability
  • soil temperature

Cite this

Balancing positive and negative plant interactions : how mosses structure vascular plant communities. / Gornall, Jemma L.; Woodin, Sarah J.; Jonsdottir, Ingibjorg S.; van der Wal, Rene.

In: Oecologia, Vol. 166, No. 3, 07.2011, p. 769-782.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{13c442a746644c4fa7e11ee9313e4e93,
title = "Balancing positive and negative plant interactions: how mosses structure vascular plant communities",
abstract = "Our understanding of positive and negative plant interactions is primarily based on vascular plants, as is the prediction that facilitative eVects dominate in harsh environments. It remains unclear whether this understanding is also applicable to moss–vascular plant interactions, which are likely to be inXuential in low-temperature environments with extensive moss ground cover such as boreal forest and arctic tundra. In a Weld experiment in high-arctic tundra, we investigated positive and negative impacts of the moss layer on vascular plants. Ramets of the shrub Salix polaris, herb Bistorta vivipara, grass Alopecurus borealis and rush Luzula confusa were transplanted into plots manipulated to contain bare soil, shallow moss (3 cm) and deep moss (6 cm) and harvested after three growing seasons. The moss layer had both positive and negative impacts upon vascular plant growth, the relative extent of which varied among vascular plant species. Deep moss cover reduced soil temperature and nitrogen availability, and this was reXected in reduced graminoid productivity. Shrub and herb biomass were greatest in shallow moss, where soil moisture also appeared to be highest. The relative importance of the mechanisms by which moss may inXuence vascular plants, through eVects on soil temperature, moisture and nitrogen availability, was investigated in a phytotron growth experiment. Soil temperature, and not nutrient availability, determined Alopecurus growth, whereas Salix only responded to increased temperature if soil nitrogen was also increased. We propose a conceptual model showing the relative importance of positive and negative inXuences of the moss mat on vascular plants along a gradient of moss depth and illustrate species-speciWc outcomes. Our Wndings suggest that, through their strong inXuence on the soil environment, mat-forming mosses structure the composition of vascular plant communities. Thus, for plant interaction theory to be widely applicable to extreme environments such as the Arctic, growth forms other than vascular plants should be considered.",
keywords = "competition, facilitation, high-arctic, nutrient availability, soil temperature",
author = "Gornall, {Jemma L.} and Woodin, {Sarah J.} and Jonsdottir, {Ingibjorg S.} and {van der Wal}, Rene",
year = "2011",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1007/s00442-011-1911-6",
language = "English",
volume = "166",
pages = "769--782",
journal = "Oecologia",
issn = "0029-8549",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Balancing positive and negative plant interactions

T2 - how mosses structure vascular plant communities

AU - Gornall, Jemma L.

AU - Woodin, Sarah J.

AU - Jonsdottir, Ingibjorg S.

AU - van der Wal, Rene

PY - 2011/7

Y1 - 2011/7

N2 - Our understanding of positive and negative plant interactions is primarily based on vascular plants, as is the prediction that facilitative eVects dominate in harsh environments. It remains unclear whether this understanding is also applicable to moss–vascular plant interactions, which are likely to be inXuential in low-temperature environments with extensive moss ground cover such as boreal forest and arctic tundra. In a Weld experiment in high-arctic tundra, we investigated positive and negative impacts of the moss layer on vascular plants. Ramets of the shrub Salix polaris, herb Bistorta vivipara, grass Alopecurus borealis and rush Luzula confusa were transplanted into plots manipulated to contain bare soil, shallow moss (3 cm) and deep moss (6 cm) and harvested after three growing seasons. The moss layer had both positive and negative impacts upon vascular plant growth, the relative extent of which varied among vascular plant species. Deep moss cover reduced soil temperature and nitrogen availability, and this was reXected in reduced graminoid productivity. Shrub and herb biomass were greatest in shallow moss, where soil moisture also appeared to be highest. The relative importance of the mechanisms by which moss may inXuence vascular plants, through eVects on soil temperature, moisture and nitrogen availability, was investigated in a phytotron growth experiment. Soil temperature, and not nutrient availability, determined Alopecurus growth, whereas Salix only responded to increased temperature if soil nitrogen was also increased. We propose a conceptual model showing the relative importance of positive and negative inXuences of the moss mat on vascular plants along a gradient of moss depth and illustrate species-speciWc outcomes. Our Wndings suggest that, through their strong inXuence on the soil environment, mat-forming mosses structure the composition of vascular plant communities. Thus, for plant interaction theory to be widely applicable to extreme environments such as the Arctic, growth forms other than vascular plants should be considered.

AB - Our understanding of positive and negative plant interactions is primarily based on vascular plants, as is the prediction that facilitative eVects dominate in harsh environments. It remains unclear whether this understanding is also applicable to moss–vascular plant interactions, which are likely to be inXuential in low-temperature environments with extensive moss ground cover such as boreal forest and arctic tundra. In a Weld experiment in high-arctic tundra, we investigated positive and negative impacts of the moss layer on vascular plants. Ramets of the shrub Salix polaris, herb Bistorta vivipara, grass Alopecurus borealis and rush Luzula confusa were transplanted into plots manipulated to contain bare soil, shallow moss (3 cm) and deep moss (6 cm) and harvested after three growing seasons. The moss layer had both positive and negative impacts upon vascular plant growth, the relative extent of which varied among vascular plant species. Deep moss cover reduced soil temperature and nitrogen availability, and this was reXected in reduced graminoid productivity. Shrub and herb biomass were greatest in shallow moss, where soil moisture also appeared to be highest. The relative importance of the mechanisms by which moss may inXuence vascular plants, through eVects on soil temperature, moisture and nitrogen availability, was investigated in a phytotron growth experiment. Soil temperature, and not nutrient availability, determined Alopecurus growth, whereas Salix only responded to increased temperature if soil nitrogen was also increased. We propose a conceptual model showing the relative importance of positive and negative inXuences of the moss mat on vascular plants along a gradient of moss depth and illustrate species-speciWc outcomes. Our Wndings suggest that, through their strong inXuence on the soil environment, mat-forming mosses structure the composition of vascular plant communities. Thus, for plant interaction theory to be widely applicable to extreme environments such as the Arctic, growth forms other than vascular plants should be considered.

KW - competition

KW - facilitation

KW - high-arctic

KW - nutrient availability

KW - soil temperature

U2 - 10.1007/s00442-011-1911-6

DO - 10.1007/s00442-011-1911-6

M3 - Article

VL - 166

SP - 769

EP - 782

JO - Oecologia

JF - Oecologia

SN - 0029-8549

IS - 3

ER -