Barriers block the effect of joint attention on working memory

Perspective taking matters

Samantha E. A. Gregory, Margaret C. Jackson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)
11 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Joint focus of attention between two individuals can influence the way that observers attend, encode and value items. Using a non-predictive gaze cuing task we previously found that working memory (WM) was better for jointly attended (validly cued) versus invalidly cued coloured squares. Here we examine whether this influence of gaze on WM is driven by observers sharing the perspective of the face cue (mental state account), or simply by increased attention to the cued location (social attention account). To manipulate perspective-taking, a closed barrier obstructed the cue face’s view of the memoranda, while an open barrier allowed the cue face to ‘see’ the colours. A central cue face flanked by two identical barriers looked left or right, followed 500ms later by coloured squares for encoding which appeared equally often in the validly and invalidly cued locations. After a blank 1000ms maintenance interval, participants stated whether a probe colour was present or not in the preceding display. When the barrier was open, WM was significantly impaired for invalidly versus validly cued items. When the barrier was closed, the effect of gaze cues on WM was abolished. In contrast, further experiments showed a significant cuing effect on the speed of simple target localisation and colour discrimination regardless of barrier type. These findings support the mental state account of joint attention in WM, whereby the attentional focus of another alters WM via higher-level engagement with the second person perspective. A goal-specific model of perspective taking is proposed.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)795-806
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition
Volume45
Issue number5
Early online date19 Jul 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2019

Fingerprint

Short-Term Memory
Cues
Color
memorandum
Perspective Taking
Working Memory
Joint Attention
discrimination
Joints
Maintenance
human being
experiment
Values

Keywords

  • Perspective taking
  • joint attention
  • gaze cueing
  • working memory
  • attention orienting
  • Gaze cuing
  • Attention orienting
  • Joint attention
  • Working memory
  • perspective taking
  • UNIQUE
  • OBJECTS
  • gaze cuing
  • EYE-GAZE
  • CUES

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

Barriers block the effect of joint attention on working memory : Perspective taking matters. / Gregory, Samantha E. A.; Jackson, Margaret C.

In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, Vol. 45, No. 5, 01.05.2019, p. 795-806.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7f79fe1d189941afa7286215d468e2e2,
title = "Barriers block the effect of joint attention on working memory: Perspective taking matters",
abstract = "Joint focus of attention between two individuals can influence the way that observers attend, encode and value items. Using a non-predictive gaze cuing task we previously found that working memory (WM) was better for jointly attended (validly cued) versus invalidly cued coloured squares. Here we examine whether this influence of gaze on WM is driven by observers sharing the perspective of the face cue (mental state account), or simply by increased attention to the cued location (social attention account). To manipulate perspective-taking, a closed barrier obstructed the cue face’s view of the memoranda, while an open barrier allowed the cue face to ‘see’ the colours. A central cue face flanked by two identical barriers looked left or right, followed 500ms later by coloured squares for encoding which appeared equally often in the validly and invalidly cued locations. After a blank 1000ms maintenance interval, participants stated whether a probe colour was present or not in the preceding display. When the barrier was open, WM was significantly impaired for invalidly versus validly cued items. When the barrier was closed, the effect of gaze cues on WM was abolished. In contrast, further experiments showed a significant cuing effect on the speed of simple target localisation and colour discrimination regardless of barrier type. These findings support the mental state account of joint attention in WM, whereby the attentional focus of another alters WM via higher-level engagement with the second person perspective. A goal-specific model of perspective taking is proposed.",
keywords = "Perspective taking, joint attention, gaze cueing, working memory, attention orienting, Gaze cuing, Attention orienting, Joint attention, Working memory, perspective taking, UNIQUE, OBJECTS, gaze cuing, EYE-GAZE, CUES",
author = "Gregory, {Samantha E. A.} and Jackson, {Margaret C.}",
note = "The authors would like to thank the following undergraduate students for their help with some of the data collection in Experiments 1 and 3 and for their insightful discussion on some of the results found: Claire Bell, Vojtech Bily, Liliana Candeias de Sousa, Catherine Georgeson, Ann Hendy, Hana Nasser, Oluwanifemi Oni, Vilma Pullinen, Sophie Schenk, Gwen Schwab, Janika Vikman, Emily Wilks, and Charles Wilson. We also thank Dr Patric Bach for his useful comments on an earlier draft.",
year = "2019",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/xlm0000622",
language = "English",
volume = "45",
pages = "795--806",
journal = "Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition",
issn = "0278-7393",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Barriers block the effect of joint attention on working memory

T2 - Perspective taking matters

AU - Gregory, Samantha E. A.

AU - Jackson, Margaret C.

N1 - The authors would like to thank the following undergraduate students for their help with some of the data collection in Experiments 1 and 3 and for their insightful discussion on some of the results found: Claire Bell, Vojtech Bily, Liliana Candeias de Sousa, Catherine Georgeson, Ann Hendy, Hana Nasser, Oluwanifemi Oni, Vilma Pullinen, Sophie Schenk, Gwen Schwab, Janika Vikman, Emily Wilks, and Charles Wilson. We also thank Dr Patric Bach for his useful comments on an earlier draft.

PY - 2019/5/1

Y1 - 2019/5/1

N2 - Joint focus of attention between two individuals can influence the way that observers attend, encode and value items. Using a non-predictive gaze cuing task we previously found that working memory (WM) was better for jointly attended (validly cued) versus invalidly cued coloured squares. Here we examine whether this influence of gaze on WM is driven by observers sharing the perspective of the face cue (mental state account), or simply by increased attention to the cued location (social attention account). To manipulate perspective-taking, a closed barrier obstructed the cue face’s view of the memoranda, while an open barrier allowed the cue face to ‘see’ the colours. A central cue face flanked by two identical barriers looked left or right, followed 500ms later by coloured squares for encoding which appeared equally often in the validly and invalidly cued locations. After a blank 1000ms maintenance interval, participants stated whether a probe colour was present or not in the preceding display. When the barrier was open, WM was significantly impaired for invalidly versus validly cued items. When the barrier was closed, the effect of gaze cues on WM was abolished. In contrast, further experiments showed a significant cuing effect on the speed of simple target localisation and colour discrimination regardless of barrier type. These findings support the mental state account of joint attention in WM, whereby the attentional focus of another alters WM via higher-level engagement with the second person perspective. A goal-specific model of perspective taking is proposed.

AB - Joint focus of attention between two individuals can influence the way that observers attend, encode and value items. Using a non-predictive gaze cuing task we previously found that working memory (WM) was better for jointly attended (validly cued) versus invalidly cued coloured squares. Here we examine whether this influence of gaze on WM is driven by observers sharing the perspective of the face cue (mental state account), or simply by increased attention to the cued location (social attention account). To manipulate perspective-taking, a closed barrier obstructed the cue face’s view of the memoranda, while an open barrier allowed the cue face to ‘see’ the colours. A central cue face flanked by two identical barriers looked left or right, followed 500ms later by coloured squares for encoding which appeared equally often in the validly and invalidly cued locations. After a blank 1000ms maintenance interval, participants stated whether a probe colour was present or not in the preceding display. When the barrier was open, WM was significantly impaired for invalidly versus validly cued items. When the barrier was closed, the effect of gaze cues on WM was abolished. In contrast, further experiments showed a significant cuing effect on the speed of simple target localisation and colour discrimination regardless of barrier type. These findings support the mental state account of joint attention in WM, whereby the attentional focus of another alters WM via higher-level engagement with the second person perspective. A goal-specific model of perspective taking is proposed.

KW - Perspective taking

KW - joint attention

KW - gaze cueing

KW - working memory

KW - attention orienting

KW - Gaze cuing

KW - Attention orienting

KW - Joint attention

KW - Working memory

KW - perspective taking

KW - UNIQUE

KW - OBJECTS

KW - gaze cuing

KW - EYE-GAZE

KW - CUES

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85050124315&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/barriers-block-effect-joint-attention-working-memory-perspective-taking-matters

U2 - 10.1037/xlm0000622

DO - 10.1037/xlm0000622

M3 - Article

VL - 45

SP - 795

EP - 806

JO - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition

JF - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition

SN - 0278-7393

IS - 5

ER -