Behavioral performance follows the time course of neural facilitation and suppression during cued shifts of feature-selective attention

S K Andersen, M M Müller

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

87 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A central question in the field of attention is whether visual processing is a strictly limited resource, which must be allocated by selective attention. If this were the case, attentional enhancement of one stimulus should invariably lead to suppression of unattended distracter stimuli. Here we examine voluntary cued shifts of feature-selective attention to either one of two superimposed red or blue random dot kinematograms (RDKs) to test whether such a reciprocal relationship between enhancement of an attended and suppression of an unattended stimulus can be observed. The steady-state visual evoked potential (SSVEP), an oscillatory brain response elicited by the flickering RDKs, was measured in human EEG. Supporting limited resources, we observed both an enhancement of the attended and a suppression of the unattended RDK, but this observed reciprocity did not occur concurrently: enhancement of the attended RDK started at 220 ms after cue onset and preceded suppression of the unattended RDK by about 130 ms. Furthermore, we found that behavior was significantly correlated with the SSVEP time course of a measure of selectivity (attended minus unattended) but not with a measure of total activity (attended plus unattended). The significant deviations from a temporally synchronized reciprocity between enhancement and suppression suggest that the enhancement of the attended stimulus may cause the suppression of the unattended stimulus in the present experiment.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)13878-13882
Number of pages5
JournalPNAS
Volume107
Issue number31
Early online date19 Jul 2010
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 3 Aug 2010

Fingerprint

Visual Evoked Potentials
Cues
Electroencephalography
Brain

Keywords

  • human EEG
  • neural mechanisms of shifting
  • steady-state visual evoked potentials
  • feature-based attention
  • random dot kinematogram

Cite this

Behavioral performance follows the time course of neural facilitation and suppression during cued shifts of feature-selective attention. / Andersen, S K; Müller, M M.

In: PNAS, Vol. 107, No. 31, 03.08.2010, p. 13878-13882.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1b3fa5fbf846485996921659007dc0e7,
title = "Behavioral performance follows the time course of neural facilitation and suppression during cued shifts of feature-selective attention",
abstract = "A central question in the field of attention is whether visual processing is a strictly limited resource, which must be allocated by selective attention. If this were the case, attentional enhancement of one stimulus should invariably lead to suppression of unattended distracter stimuli. Here we examine voluntary cued shifts of feature-selective attention to either one of two superimposed red or blue random dot kinematograms (RDKs) to test whether such a reciprocal relationship between enhancement of an attended and suppression of an unattended stimulus can be observed. The steady-state visual evoked potential (SSVEP), an oscillatory brain response elicited by the flickering RDKs, was measured in human EEG. Supporting limited resources, we observed both an enhancement of the attended and a suppression of the unattended RDK, but this observed reciprocity did not occur concurrently: enhancement of the attended RDK started at 220 ms after cue onset and preceded suppression of the unattended RDK by about 130 ms. Furthermore, we found that behavior was significantly correlated with the SSVEP time course of a measure of selectivity (attended minus unattended) but not with a measure of total activity (attended plus unattended). The significant deviations from a temporally synchronized reciprocity between enhancement and suppression suggest that the enhancement of the attended stimulus may cause the suppression of the unattended stimulus in the present experiment.",
keywords = "human EEG, neural mechanisms of shifting, steady-state visual evoked potentials, feature-based attention, random dot kinematogram",
author = "Andersen, {S K} and M{\"u}ller, {M M}",
year = "2010",
month = "8",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1073/pnas.1002436107",
language = "English",
volume = "107",
pages = "13878--13882",
journal = "PNAS",
issn = "0027-8424",
publisher = "NATL ACAD SCIENCES",
number = "31",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Behavioral performance follows the time course of neural facilitation and suppression during cued shifts of feature-selective attention

AU - Andersen, S K

AU - Müller, M M

PY - 2010/8/3

Y1 - 2010/8/3

N2 - A central question in the field of attention is whether visual processing is a strictly limited resource, which must be allocated by selective attention. If this were the case, attentional enhancement of one stimulus should invariably lead to suppression of unattended distracter stimuli. Here we examine voluntary cued shifts of feature-selective attention to either one of two superimposed red or blue random dot kinematograms (RDKs) to test whether such a reciprocal relationship between enhancement of an attended and suppression of an unattended stimulus can be observed. The steady-state visual evoked potential (SSVEP), an oscillatory brain response elicited by the flickering RDKs, was measured in human EEG. Supporting limited resources, we observed both an enhancement of the attended and a suppression of the unattended RDK, but this observed reciprocity did not occur concurrently: enhancement of the attended RDK started at 220 ms after cue onset and preceded suppression of the unattended RDK by about 130 ms. Furthermore, we found that behavior was significantly correlated with the SSVEP time course of a measure of selectivity (attended minus unattended) but not with a measure of total activity (attended plus unattended). The significant deviations from a temporally synchronized reciprocity between enhancement and suppression suggest that the enhancement of the attended stimulus may cause the suppression of the unattended stimulus in the present experiment.

AB - A central question in the field of attention is whether visual processing is a strictly limited resource, which must be allocated by selective attention. If this were the case, attentional enhancement of one stimulus should invariably lead to suppression of unattended distracter stimuli. Here we examine voluntary cued shifts of feature-selective attention to either one of two superimposed red or blue random dot kinematograms (RDKs) to test whether such a reciprocal relationship between enhancement of an attended and suppression of an unattended stimulus can be observed. The steady-state visual evoked potential (SSVEP), an oscillatory brain response elicited by the flickering RDKs, was measured in human EEG. Supporting limited resources, we observed both an enhancement of the attended and a suppression of the unattended RDK, but this observed reciprocity did not occur concurrently: enhancement of the attended RDK started at 220 ms after cue onset and preceded suppression of the unattended RDK by about 130 ms. Furthermore, we found that behavior was significantly correlated with the SSVEP time course of a measure of selectivity (attended minus unattended) but not with a measure of total activity (attended plus unattended). The significant deviations from a temporally synchronized reciprocity between enhancement and suppression suggest that the enhancement of the attended stimulus may cause the suppression of the unattended stimulus in the present experiment.

KW - human EEG

KW - neural mechanisms of shifting

KW - steady-state visual evoked potentials

KW - feature-based attention

KW - random dot kinematogram

U2 - 10.1073/pnas.1002436107

DO - 10.1073/pnas.1002436107

M3 - Article

VL - 107

SP - 13878

EP - 13882

JO - PNAS

JF - PNAS

SN - 0027-8424

IS - 31

ER -