Behind the World Bank’s ringing declarations of “social accountability”: Ghana’s public financial management reform

Chandana G. Alawattage (Corresponding Author), John De-Clerk Azure

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Accountability has become integral to many African development reform initiatives and permeated the World Bank’s (WB) policy discourses, with “social accountability” as a major plank in its development orthodoxy. Since the 2004 Word Development Report (WDR), the WB’s leadership has been declaring its commitment to social accountability. This paper excavates what lies behind the ringing declarations of commitment to social accountability in the context of Ghana’s Public Financial Management Reform Programme. Empirically, it draws on four months’ fieldwork into the accountability practices this programme brought about and an extensive analysis of WB discourses on public sector reforms and social accountability. Theoretically, the paper draws on Foucault’s governmentality and the notion of agonistic democracy central to the recent democratic accountability debate in critical accounting circles. The paper argues that the WB’s social accountability crusade hinges on the neoliberal concerns of efficiency and fiscal discipline rather than creating a democratic social order, which then questions the very notion of social accountability that the WB is propagating, especially its discursive and ideological “short-circuiting” of democratic processes. The paper finds that the dominant and dominating accountability forms that facilitate the WB’s financial hegemony are privileged over potentially emancipatory ones. The findings highlight that as local governments become responsible to international development agencies through the “social accountabilities” that the WB is promoting, they become less socially and democratically accountable to their own populace-the very place where social accountability should truly rest.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages43
JournalCritical Perspectives On Accounting
Early online date14 Feb 2019
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 14 Feb 2019

Fingerprint

financial management
Ghana
World Bank
reform
responsibility
Financial management
Accountability
commitment
crusade
reform program
discourse
governmentality
social order
hegemony
public sector

Keywords

  • social accountability
  • public financial management reforms
  • World Bank
  • Ghana
  • governmentality
  • agonistics
  • Agonistics
  • Public financial management reforms
  • Social accountability
  • Governmentality

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Information Systems and Management
  • Accounting
  • Finance
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Behind the World Bank’s ringing declarations of “social accountability” : Ghana’s public financial management reform. / Alawattage, Chandana G. (Corresponding Author); Azure, John De-Clerk.

In: Critical Perspectives On Accounting, 14.02.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ecec89249cc74c858565111128b77164,
title = "Behind the World Bank’s ringing declarations of “social accountability”: Ghana’s public financial management reform",
abstract = "Accountability has become integral to many African development reform initiatives and permeated the World Bank’s (WB) policy discourses, with “social accountability” as a major plank in its development orthodoxy. Since the 2004 Word Development Report (WDR), the WB’s leadership has been declaring its commitment to social accountability. This paper excavates what lies behind the ringing declarations of commitment to social accountability in the context of Ghana’s Public Financial Management Reform Programme. Empirically, it draws on four months’ fieldwork into the accountability practices this programme brought about and an extensive analysis of WB discourses on public sector reforms and social accountability. Theoretically, the paper draws on Foucault’s governmentality and the notion of agonistic democracy central to the recent democratic accountability debate in critical accounting circles. The paper argues that the WB’s social accountability crusade hinges on the neoliberal concerns of efficiency and fiscal discipline rather than creating a democratic social order, which then questions the very notion of social accountability that the WB is propagating, especially its discursive and ideological “short-circuiting” of democratic processes. The paper finds that the dominant and dominating accountability forms that facilitate the WB’s financial hegemony are privileged over potentially emancipatory ones. The findings highlight that as local governments become responsible to international development agencies through the “social accountabilities” that the WB is promoting, they become less socially and democratically accountable to their own populace-the very place where social accountability should truly rest.",
keywords = "social accountability, public financial management reforms , World Bank, Ghana, governmentality, agonistics, Agonistics, Public financial management reforms, Social accountability, Governmentality",
author = "Alawattage, {Chandana G.} and Azure, {John De-Clerk}",
year = "2019",
month = "2",
day = "14",
doi = "10.1016/j.cpa.2019.02.002",
language = "English",
journal = "Critical Perspectives On Accounting",
issn = "1045-2354",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Behind the World Bank’s ringing declarations of “social accountability”

T2 - Ghana’s public financial management reform

AU - Alawattage, Chandana G.

AU - Azure, John De-Clerk

PY - 2019/2/14

Y1 - 2019/2/14

N2 - Accountability has become integral to many African development reform initiatives and permeated the World Bank’s (WB) policy discourses, with “social accountability” as a major plank in its development orthodoxy. Since the 2004 Word Development Report (WDR), the WB’s leadership has been declaring its commitment to social accountability. This paper excavates what lies behind the ringing declarations of commitment to social accountability in the context of Ghana’s Public Financial Management Reform Programme. Empirically, it draws on four months’ fieldwork into the accountability practices this programme brought about and an extensive analysis of WB discourses on public sector reforms and social accountability. Theoretically, the paper draws on Foucault’s governmentality and the notion of agonistic democracy central to the recent democratic accountability debate in critical accounting circles. The paper argues that the WB’s social accountability crusade hinges on the neoliberal concerns of efficiency and fiscal discipline rather than creating a democratic social order, which then questions the very notion of social accountability that the WB is propagating, especially its discursive and ideological “short-circuiting” of democratic processes. The paper finds that the dominant and dominating accountability forms that facilitate the WB’s financial hegemony are privileged over potentially emancipatory ones. The findings highlight that as local governments become responsible to international development agencies through the “social accountabilities” that the WB is promoting, they become less socially and democratically accountable to their own populace-the very place where social accountability should truly rest.

AB - Accountability has become integral to many African development reform initiatives and permeated the World Bank’s (WB) policy discourses, with “social accountability” as a major plank in its development orthodoxy. Since the 2004 Word Development Report (WDR), the WB’s leadership has been declaring its commitment to social accountability. This paper excavates what lies behind the ringing declarations of commitment to social accountability in the context of Ghana’s Public Financial Management Reform Programme. Empirically, it draws on four months’ fieldwork into the accountability practices this programme brought about and an extensive analysis of WB discourses on public sector reforms and social accountability. Theoretically, the paper draws on Foucault’s governmentality and the notion of agonistic democracy central to the recent democratic accountability debate in critical accounting circles. The paper argues that the WB’s social accountability crusade hinges on the neoliberal concerns of efficiency and fiscal discipline rather than creating a democratic social order, which then questions the very notion of social accountability that the WB is propagating, especially its discursive and ideological “short-circuiting” of democratic processes. The paper finds that the dominant and dominating accountability forms that facilitate the WB’s financial hegemony are privileged over potentially emancipatory ones. The findings highlight that as local governments become responsible to international development agencies through the “social accountabilities” that the WB is promoting, they become less socially and democratically accountable to their own populace-the very place where social accountability should truly rest.

KW - social accountability

KW - public financial management reforms

KW - World Bank

KW - Ghana

KW - governmentality

KW - agonistics

KW - Agonistics

KW - Public financial management reforms

KW - Social accountability

KW - Governmentality

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061457790&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/behind-world-banks-ringing-declarations-social-accountability-ghanas-public-financial-management-ref

U2 - 10.1016/j.cpa.2019.02.002

DO - 10.1016/j.cpa.2019.02.002

M3 - Article

JO - Critical Perspectives On Accounting

JF - Critical Perspectives On Accounting

SN - 1045-2354

ER -