Being open about unanticipated problems in health care: the challenges of uncertainties

Yvonne Birks, Vikki Entwistle, Reema Harrison, Kate Bosanquet, Ian Watt, Rick Iedema

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Discussion of unanticipated problems in care with patients and their families ('open disclosure') is now widely advocated. Despite international efforts and the introduction of a range of policies and guidance to promote such discussions, the expectations of policy makers and patients are often not matched in practice. We consider some reasons for the persistence of shortfalls in the occurrence and quality of open disclosure. We draw on research conducted to investigate the implementation of a 'Being open' policy in England, reflecting particularly on insights derived from interviews with health care professionals. Health care professionals were broadly supportive of the idea of open disclosure. Some expressed well-recognized concern about punishment and being blamed, but this did not appear to be the main driver of their communication practices. Their accounts of what happened around particular problems in health care indicated that they brought a complex range of considerations to bear on questions of whether and how these were discussed with patients and relatives. Guidance about open disclosure based on assessments of levels of harm to patients can complicate and perhaps distort health care professionals' approaches, particularly when the extent and/or cause of harm was uncertain. Health care professionals who engage in open disclosure must be able to negotiate appropriate ways through complex and sensitive discussions. The responses of patients and relatives are not always predictable and even the best open disclosure practice may not resolve problems and concerns. Guidance, training and support for staff need to reflect these challenges.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)54-60
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Health Services Research & Policy
Volume20
Issue number1 Suppl
Early online date2 Dec 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2015

Fingerprint

Disclosure
Uncertainty
Delivery of Health Care
Patient Harm
Training Support
Punishment
Administrative Personnel
England
Patient Care
Communication
Interviews
Research

Keywords

  • adverse events
  • disclosure
  • policy

Cite this

Being open about unanticipated problems in health care : the challenges of uncertainties. / Birks, Yvonne; Entwistle, Vikki; Harrison, Reema; Bosanquet, Kate; Watt, Ian; Iedema, Rick.

In: Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, Vol. 20, No. 1 Suppl, 01.01.2015, p. 54-60.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Birks, Y, Entwistle, V, Harrison, R, Bosanquet, K, Watt, I & Iedema, R 2015, 'Being open about unanticipated problems in health care: the challenges of uncertainties' Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, vol. 20, no. 1 Suppl, pp. 54-60. https://doi.org/10.1177/1355819614558100
Birks, Yvonne ; Entwistle, Vikki ; Harrison, Reema ; Bosanquet, Kate ; Watt, Ian ; Iedema, Rick. / Being open about unanticipated problems in health care : the challenges of uncertainties. In: Journal of Health Services Research & Policy. 2015 ; Vol. 20, No. 1 Suppl. pp. 54-60.
@article{2a688d1e52b946dc908fd76dddbdd222,
title = "Being open about unanticipated problems in health care: the challenges of uncertainties",
abstract = "Discussion of unanticipated problems in care with patients and their families ('open disclosure') is now widely advocated. Despite international efforts and the introduction of a range of policies and guidance to promote such discussions, the expectations of policy makers and patients are often not matched in practice. We consider some reasons for the persistence of shortfalls in the occurrence and quality of open disclosure. We draw on research conducted to investigate the implementation of a 'Being open' policy in England, reflecting particularly on insights derived from interviews with health care professionals. Health care professionals were broadly supportive of the idea of open disclosure. Some expressed well-recognized concern about punishment and being blamed, but this did not appear to be the main driver of their communication practices. Their accounts of what happened around particular problems in health care indicated that they brought a complex range of considerations to bear on questions of whether and how these were discussed with patients and relatives. Guidance about open disclosure based on assessments of levels of harm to patients can complicate and perhaps distort health care professionals' approaches, particularly when the extent and/or cause of harm was uncertain. Health care professionals who engage in open disclosure must be able to negotiate appropriate ways through complex and sensitive discussions. The responses of patients and relatives are not always predictable and even the best open disclosure practice may not resolve problems and concerns. Guidance, training and support for staff need to reflect these challenges.",
keywords = "adverse events, disclosure, policy",
author = "Yvonne Birks and Vikki Entwistle and Reema Harrison and Kate Bosanquet and Ian Watt and Rick Iedema",
note = "{\circledC} The Author(s) 2014 Reprints and permissions: sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav. Acknowledgements This paper draws on a longer report which benefited from the contributions of the following: Jill Hall, Melissa Harden, Peter Walsh, Sarah Ronaldson, David Roberts, Joy Adamson and John Wright. The views presented here are those of the authors of this paper not necessarily those of the NHS, the National Institute for Health Research or the Department of Health.",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1355819614558100",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "54--60",
journal = "Journal of Health Services Research & Policy",
issn = "1355-8196",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "1 Suppl",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Being open about unanticipated problems in health care

T2 - the challenges of uncertainties

AU - Birks, Yvonne

AU - Entwistle, Vikki

AU - Harrison, Reema

AU - Bosanquet, Kate

AU - Watt, Ian

AU - Iedema, Rick

N1 - © The Author(s) 2014 Reprints and permissions: sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav. Acknowledgements This paper draws on a longer report which benefited from the contributions of the following: Jill Hall, Melissa Harden, Peter Walsh, Sarah Ronaldson, David Roberts, Joy Adamson and John Wright. The views presented here are those of the authors of this paper not necessarily those of the NHS, the National Institute for Health Research or the Department of Health.

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Discussion of unanticipated problems in care with patients and their families ('open disclosure') is now widely advocated. Despite international efforts and the introduction of a range of policies and guidance to promote such discussions, the expectations of policy makers and patients are often not matched in practice. We consider some reasons for the persistence of shortfalls in the occurrence and quality of open disclosure. We draw on research conducted to investigate the implementation of a 'Being open' policy in England, reflecting particularly on insights derived from interviews with health care professionals. Health care professionals were broadly supportive of the idea of open disclosure. Some expressed well-recognized concern about punishment and being blamed, but this did not appear to be the main driver of their communication practices. Their accounts of what happened around particular problems in health care indicated that they brought a complex range of considerations to bear on questions of whether and how these were discussed with patients and relatives. Guidance about open disclosure based on assessments of levels of harm to patients can complicate and perhaps distort health care professionals' approaches, particularly when the extent and/or cause of harm was uncertain. Health care professionals who engage in open disclosure must be able to negotiate appropriate ways through complex and sensitive discussions. The responses of patients and relatives are not always predictable and even the best open disclosure practice may not resolve problems and concerns. Guidance, training and support for staff need to reflect these challenges.

AB - Discussion of unanticipated problems in care with patients and their families ('open disclosure') is now widely advocated. Despite international efforts and the introduction of a range of policies and guidance to promote such discussions, the expectations of policy makers and patients are often not matched in practice. We consider some reasons for the persistence of shortfalls in the occurrence and quality of open disclosure. We draw on research conducted to investigate the implementation of a 'Being open' policy in England, reflecting particularly on insights derived from interviews with health care professionals. Health care professionals were broadly supportive of the idea of open disclosure. Some expressed well-recognized concern about punishment and being blamed, but this did not appear to be the main driver of their communication practices. Their accounts of what happened around particular problems in health care indicated that they brought a complex range of considerations to bear on questions of whether and how these were discussed with patients and relatives. Guidance about open disclosure based on assessments of levels of harm to patients can complicate and perhaps distort health care professionals' approaches, particularly when the extent and/or cause of harm was uncertain. Health care professionals who engage in open disclosure must be able to negotiate appropriate ways through complex and sensitive discussions. The responses of patients and relatives are not always predictable and even the best open disclosure practice may not resolve problems and concerns. Guidance, training and support for staff need to reflect these challenges.

KW - adverse events

KW - disclosure

KW - policy

U2 - 10.1177/1355819614558100

DO - 10.1177/1355819614558100

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 54

EP - 60

JO - Journal of Health Services Research & Policy

JF - Journal of Health Services Research & Policy

SN - 1355-8196

IS - 1 Suppl

ER -