Benefits and risks of emphasis adaptation in study workflows

Nava Tintarev; Matthew James Green; Judith Masthoff; Frouke Hermens

Benefits and risks of emphasis adaptation in study workflows

Nava Tintarev, Matthew James Green, Judith Masthoff, Frouke Hermens

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Published conference contribution

Abstract

This paper looks at the effect of highlighting in a study plan, represented as a workflow with prerequisites. We compare the effectiveness of highlighting when the adaptation was correct (participants responded quicker and more correctly), and when it did not highlight the most relevant tasks (detrimental effect). False statements took longer to process than positive statements (deciding about things that were not in the plan), but also surprisingly had lower error rates than positive statements. These findings imply that when the system makes errors in the adaptation this is harmful, and may cause students to incorrectly believe that they do not need to do certain tasks

Original language	English
Title of host publication	UMAP 2015 Extended Proceedings
Subtitle of host publication	Posters, Demos, Late-breaking Results and Workshop Proceedings of the 23rd Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization (UMAP 2015)
Editors	Alexandra Cristea, Judith Masthoff, Alan Said, Nava Tintarev
Publisher	CEUR-WS
Number of pages	8
Publication status	Published - 2015
Event	The 5th International Workshop on Personalization Approaches in Learning Environments (PALE) - Dublin, Ireland Duration: 30 Jun 2015 → …

Publication series

Name	CEUR Workshop Proceedings
Publisher	CEUR-WS
Volume	1388
ISSN (Electronic)	1613-0073

Conference

Conference	The 5th International Workshop on Personalization Approaches in Learning Environments (PALE)
Country/Territory	Ireland
City	Dublin
Period	30/06/15 → …

Keywords

visualisation
plan presentation
study workflows
user-centered evaluation
highlighting
emphasis adaptation

Access to Document

http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1388/PALE2015-paper1.pdfLicence: Unspecified

Cite this

Tintarev, N., Green, M. J., Masthoff, J., & Hermens, F. (2015). Benefits and risks of emphasis adaptation in study workflows. In A. Cristea, J. Masthoff, A. Said, & N. Tintarev (Eds.), UMAP 2015 Extended Proceedings: Posters, Demos, Late-breaking Results and Workshop Proceedings of the 23rd Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization (UMAP 2015) (CEUR Workshop Proceedings; Vol. 1388). CEUR-WS. http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1388/PALE2015-paper1.pdf

Benefits and risks of emphasis adaptation in study workflows. / Tintarev, Nava; Green, Matthew James; Masthoff, Judith et al.

UMAP 2015 Extended Proceedings: Posters, Demos, Late-breaking Results and Workshop Proceedings of the 23rd Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization (UMAP 2015). ed. / Alexandra Cristea; Judith Masthoff; Alan Said; Nava Tintarev. CEUR-WS, 2015. (CEUR Workshop Proceedings; Vol. 1388).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Published conference contribution

Tintarev, N, Green, MJ, Masthoff, J & Hermens, F 2015, Benefits and risks of emphasis adaptation in study workflows. in A Cristea, J Masthoff, A Said & N Tintarev (eds), UMAP 2015 Extended Proceedings: Posters, Demos, Late-breaking Results and Workshop Proceedings of the 23rd Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization (UMAP 2015). CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 1388, CEUR-WS, The 5th International Workshop on Personalization Approaches in Learning Environments (PALE), Dublin, Ireland, 30/06/15. <http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1388/PALE2015-paper1.pdf>

Tintarev N, Green MJ, Masthoff J, Hermens F. Benefits and risks of emphasis adaptation in study workflows. In Cristea A, Masthoff J, Said A, Tintarev N, editors, UMAP 2015 Extended Proceedings: Posters, Demos, Late-breaking Results and Workshop Proceedings of the 23rd Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization (UMAP 2015). CEUR-WS. 2015. (CEUR Workshop Proceedings).

Tintarev, Nava ; Green, Matthew James ; Masthoff, Judith et al. / Benefits and risks of emphasis adaptation in study workflows. UMAP 2015 Extended Proceedings: Posters, Demos, Late-breaking Results and Workshop Proceedings of the 23rd Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization (UMAP 2015). editor / Alexandra Cristea ; Judith Masthoff ; Alan Said ; Nava Tintarev. CEUR-WS, 2015. (CEUR Workshop Proceedings).

@inproceedings{ce2821d0f5dc4f869be6882785b41d30,

title = "Benefits and risks of emphasis adaptation in study workflows",

abstract = "This paper looks at the effect of highlighting in a study plan, represented as a workflow with prerequisites. We compare the effectiveness of highlighting when the adaptation was correct (participants responded quicker and more correctly), and when it did not highlight the most relevant tasks (detrimental effect). False statements took longer to process than positive statements (deciding about things that were not in the plan), but also surprisingly had lower error rates than positive statements. These findings imply that when the system makes errors in the adaptation this is harmful, and may cause students to incorrectly believe that they do not need to do certain tasks",

keywords = "visualisation, plan presentation, study workflows, user-centered evaluation, highlighting, emphasis adaptation",

author = "Nava Tintarev and Green, {Matthew James} and Judith Masthoff and Frouke Hermens",

year = "2015",

language = "English",

series = "CEUR Workshop Proceedings",

publisher = "CEUR-WS",

editor = "Alexandra Cristea and Judith Masthoff and Alan Said and Nava Tintarev",

booktitle = "UMAP 2015 Extended Proceedings",

note = "The 5th International Workshop on Personalization Approaches in Learning Environments (PALE) ; Conference date: 30-06-2015",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Benefits and risks of emphasis adaptation in study workflows

AU - Tintarev, Nava

AU - Green, Matthew James

AU - Masthoff, Judith

AU - Hermens, Frouke

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - This paper looks at the effect of highlighting in a study plan, represented as a workflow with prerequisites. We compare the effectiveness of highlighting when the adaptation was correct (participants responded quicker and more correctly), and when it did not highlight the most relevant tasks (detrimental effect). False statements took longer to process than positive statements (deciding about things that were not in the plan), but also surprisingly had lower error rates than positive statements. These findings imply that when the system makes errors in the adaptation this is harmful, and may cause students to incorrectly believe that they do not need to do certain tasks

AB - This paper looks at the effect of highlighting in a study plan, represented as a workflow with prerequisites. We compare the effectiveness of highlighting when the adaptation was correct (participants responded quicker and more correctly), and when it did not highlight the most relevant tasks (detrimental effect). False statements took longer to process than positive statements (deciding about things that were not in the plan), but also surprisingly had lower error rates than positive statements. These findings imply that when the system makes errors in the adaptation this is harmful, and may cause students to incorrectly believe that they do not need to do certain tasks

KW - visualisation

KW - plan presentation

KW - study workflows

KW - user-centered evaluation

KW - highlighting

KW - emphasis adaptation

UR - http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1388/

M3 - Published conference contribution

T3 - CEUR Workshop Proceedings

BT - UMAP 2015 Extended Proceedings

A2 - Cristea, Alexandra

A2 - Masthoff, Judith

A2 - Said, Alan

A2 - Tintarev, Nava

PB - CEUR-WS

T2 - The 5th International Workshop on Personalization Approaches in Learning Environments (PALE)

Y2 - 30 June 2015

ER -

Benefits and risks of emphasis adaptation in study workflows

Abstract

Publication series

Conference

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Benefits and costs of emphasis adaptation in study workflows

Cite this

Benefits and risks of emphasis adaptation in study workflows

Abstract

Publication series

Conference

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Datasets

Benefits and costs of emphasis adaptation in study workflows

Cite this