Between- and within-scanner variability in the CaliBrain study n-back cognitive task

Victoria Gradin, Viktoria-Eleni Gountouna, Gordon Waiter, Trevor S Ahearn, David Brennan, Barrie Condon, Ian Marshall, David J McGonigle, Alison D Murray, Heather Whalley, Jonathan Cavanagh, Donald Hadley, Katherine Lymer, Andrew McIntosh, Thomas William Moorhead, Dominic Job, Joanna Wardlaw, Stephen M Lawrie, John D Steele

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Psychiatric neuroimaging techniques are likely to improve understanding of the brain in health and disease, but studies tend to be small, based in one imaging centre and of unclear generalisability. Multicentre studies have great appeal but face problems if functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data from different centres are to be combined. Fourteen healthy volunteers had two brain scans on different days at three scanners. Considerable effort was first made to use similar scanning sequences and standardise task implementation across centres. The n-back cognitive task was used to investigate between- and within-scanner reproducibility and reliability. Both the functional imaging and behavioural results were in good accord with the existing literature. We found no significant differences in the activation/deactivation maps between scanners, or between repeat visits to the same scanners. Between- and within-scanner reproducibility and reliability was very similar. However, the smoothness of images from the scanners differed, suggesting that smoothness equalization might further reduce inter-scanner variability. Our results for the n-back task suggest it is possible to acquire fMRI data from different scanners which allows pooling across centres, when the same field strength scanners are used and scanning sequences and paradigm implementations are standardised.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)86-95
Number of pages10
JournalPsychiatry Research
Volume184
Issue number2
Early online date28 Sep 2010
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 Nov 2010

Fingerprint

Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Brain
Neuroimaging
Multicenter Studies
Psychiatry
Healthy Volunteers
Health

Keywords

  • adult
  • analysis of variance
  • brain
  • brain mapping
  • cognition
  • female
  • humans
  • image processing, computer-assisted
  • magnetic resonance imaging
  • male
  • middle aged
  • neuropsychological tests
  • psychomotor performance
  • reaction time
  • reproducibility of results
  • multi-centre fMRI
  • reproductibility
  • reliability

Cite this

Between- and within-scanner variability in the CaliBrain study n-back cognitive task. / Gradin, Victoria; Gountouna, Viktoria-Eleni; Waiter, Gordon; Ahearn, Trevor S; Brennan, David; Condon, Barrie; Marshall, Ian; McGonigle, David J; Murray, Alison D; Whalley, Heather; Cavanagh, Jonathan; Hadley, Donald; Lymer, Katherine; McIntosh, Andrew; Moorhead, Thomas William; Job, Dominic; Wardlaw, Joanna; Lawrie, Stephen M; Steele, John D.

In: Psychiatry Research, Vol. 184, No. 2, 30.11.2010, p. 86-95.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gradin, V, Gountouna, V-E, Waiter, G, Ahearn, TS, Brennan, D, Condon, B, Marshall, I, McGonigle, DJ, Murray, AD, Whalley, H, Cavanagh, J, Hadley, D, Lymer, K, McIntosh, A, Moorhead, TW, Job, D, Wardlaw, J, Lawrie, SM & Steele, JD 2010, 'Between- and within-scanner variability in the CaliBrain study n-back cognitive task', Psychiatry Research, vol. 184, no. 2, pp. 86-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pscychresns.2010.08.010
Gradin, Victoria ; Gountouna, Viktoria-Eleni ; Waiter, Gordon ; Ahearn, Trevor S ; Brennan, David ; Condon, Barrie ; Marshall, Ian ; McGonigle, David J ; Murray, Alison D ; Whalley, Heather ; Cavanagh, Jonathan ; Hadley, Donald ; Lymer, Katherine ; McIntosh, Andrew ; Moorhead, Thomas William ; Job, Dominic ; Wardlaw, Joanna ; Lawrie, Stephen M ; Steele, John D. / Between- and within-scanner variability in the CaliBrain study n-back cognitive task. In: Psychiatry Research. 2010 ; Vol. 184, No. 2. pp. 86-95.
@article{511ee6fbd306445e9a3dee63f4f41c02,
title = "Between- and within-scanner variability in the CaliBrain study n-back cognitive task",
abstract = "Psychiatric neuroimaging techniques are likely to improve understanding of the brain in health and disease, but studies tend to be small, based in one imaging centre and of unclear generalisability. Multicentre studies have great appeal but face problems if functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data from different centres are to be combined. Fourteen healthy volunteers had two brain scans on different days at three scanners. Considerable effort was first made to use similar scanning sequences and standardise task implementation across centres. The n-back cognitive task was used to investigate between- and within-scanner reproducibility and reliability. Both the functional imaging and behavioural results were in good accord with the existing literature. We found no significant differences in the activation/deactivation maps between scanners, or between repeat visits to the same scanners. Between- and within-scanner reproducibility and reliability was very similar. However, the smoothness of images from the scanners differed, suggesting that smoothness equalization might further reduce inter-scanner variability. Our results for the n-back task suggest it is possible to acquire fMRI data from different scanners which allows pooling across centres, when the same field strength scanners are used and scanning sequences and paradigm implementations are standardised.",
keywords = "adult, analysis of variance, brain, brain mapping, cognition, female, humans, image processing, computer-assisted, magnetic resonance imaging, male, middle aged, neuropsychological tests, psychomotor performance, reaction time, reproducibility of results, multi-centre fMRI, reproductibility, reliability",
author = "Victoria Gradin and Viktoria-Eleni Gountouna and Gordon Waiter and Ahearn, {Trevor S} and David Brennan and Barrie Condon and Ian Marshall and McGonigle, {David J} and Murray, {Alison D} and Heather Whalley and Jonathan Cavanagh and Donald Hadley and Katherine Lymer and Andrew McIntosh and Moorhead, {Thomas William} and Dominic Job and Joanna Wardlaw and Lawrie, {Stephen M} and Steele, {John D}",
note = "Copyright {\circledC} 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.",
year = "2010",
month = "11",
day = "30",
doi = "10.1016/j.pscychresns.2010.08.010",
language = "English",
volume = "184",
pages = "86--95",
journal = "Psychiatry Research",
issn = "0165-1781",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Between- and within-scanner variability in the CaliBrain study n-back cognitive task

AU - Gradin, Victoria

AU - Gountouna, Viktoria-Eleni

AU - Waiter, Gordon

AU - Ahearn, Trevor S

AU - Brennan, David

AU - Condon, Barrie

AU - Marshall, Ian

AU - McGonigle, David J

AU - Murray, Alison D

AU - Whalley, Heather

AU - Cavanagh, Jonathan

AU - Hadley, Donald

AU - Lymer, Katherine

AU - McIntosh, Andrew

AU - Moorhead, Thomas William

AU - Job, Dominic

AU - Wardlaw, Joanna

AU - Lawrie, Stephen M

AU - Steele, John D

N1 - Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

PY - 2010/11/30

Y1 - 2010/11/30

N2 - Psychiatric neuroimaging techniques are likely to improve understanding of the brain in health and disease, but studies tend to be small, based in one imaging centre and of unclear generalisability. Multicentre studies have great appeal but face problems if functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data from different centres are to be combined. Fourteen healthy volunteers had two brain scans on different days at three scanners. Considerable effort was first made to use similar scanning sequences and standardise task implementation across centres. The n-back cognitive task was used to investigate between- and within-scanner reproducibility and reliability. Both the functional imaging and behavioural results were in good accord with the existing literature. We found no significant differences in the activation/deactivation maps between scanners, or between repeat visits to the same scanners. Between- and within-scanner reproducibility and reliability was very similar. However, the smoothness of images from the scanners differed, suggesting that smoothness equalization might further reduce inter-scanner variability. Our results for the n-back task suggest it is possible to acquire fMRI data from different scanners which allows pooling across centres, when the same field strength scanners are used and scanning sequences and paradigm implementations are standardised.

AB - Psychiatric neuroimaging techniques are likely to improve understanding of the brain in health and disease, but studies tend to be small, based in one imaging centre and of unclear generalisability. Multicentre studies have great appeal but face problems if functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data from different centres are to be combined. Fourteen healthy volunteers had two brain scans on different days at three scanners. Considerable effort was first made to use similar scanning sequences and standardise task implementation across centres. The n-back cognitive task was used to investigate between- and within-scanner reproducibility and reliability. Both the functional imaging and behavioural results were in good accord with the existing literature. We found no significant differences in the activation/deactivation maps between scanners, or between repeat visits to the same scanners. Between- and within-scanner reproducibility and reliability was very similar. However, the smoothness of images from the scanners differed, suggesting that smoothness equalization might further reduce inter-scanner variability. Our results for the n-back task suggest it is possible to acquire fMRI data from different scanners which allows pooling across centres, when the same field strength scanners are used and scanning sequences and paradigm implementations are standardised.

KW - adult

KW - analysis of variance

KW - brain

KW - brain mapping

KW - cognition

KW - female

KW - humans

KW - image processing, computer-assisted

KW - magnetic resonance imaging

KW - male

KW - middle aged

KW - neuropsychological tests

KW - psychomotor performance

KW - reaction time

KW - reproducibility of results

KW - multi-centre fMRI

KW - reproductibility

KW - reliability

U2 - 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2010.08.010

DO - 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2010.08.010

M3 - Article

VL - 184

SP - 86

EP - 95

JO - Psychiatry Research

JF - Psychiatry Research

SN - 0165-1781

IS - 2

ER -