Beyond conventional change models: a processual approach

Patrick Mark Dawson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article provides a critical appraisal of situational frameworks and for mulates an alternative perspective. Contingency theory is briefly examined and the Australian change model of Dunphy and Stace is outlined and crit icized. It is then shown how contextualist research views longitudinal research methodologies to be the most appropriate for studying the processes by which change unfolds. Building on this work, a processual perspective is formulated which advocates that the context, substance and the politics of change are all central to explanations of organizational transition. The article concludes by suggesting that conventional change models be replaced by processual frame works which are better able to explain the complex ongoing dynamic of organ izational change.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)57-70
JournalAsia Pacific Journal of Human Resources
Volume34
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 1996

Fingerprint

Longitudinal research
Complex dynamics
Contingency theory

Cite this

Beyond conventional change models : a processual approach. / Dawson, Patrick Mark.

In: Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, Vol. 34, No. 2, 12.1996, p. 57-70.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Dawson, Patrick Mark. / Beyond conventional change models : a processual approach. In: Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources. 1996 ; Vol. 34, No. 2. pp. 57-70.
@article{9f38ff56e21c44a895ae4fb88869b6ea,
title = "Beyond conventional change models: a processual approach",
abstract = "This article provides a critical appraisal of situational frameworks and for mulates an alternative perspective. Contingency theory is briefly examined and the Australian change model of Dunphy and Stace is outlined and crit icized. It is then shown how contextualist research views longitudinal research methodologies to be the most appropriate for studying the processes by which change unfolds. Building on this work, a processual perspective is formulated which advocates that the context, substance and the politics of change are all central to explanations of organizational transition. The article concludes by suggesting that conventional change models be replaced by processual frame works which are better able to explain the complex ongoing dynamic of organ izational change.",
author = "Dawson, {Patrick Mark}",
year = "1996",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1177/103841119603400207",
language = "English",
volume = "34",
pages = "57--70",
journal = "Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources",
issn = "1038-4111",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Beyond conventional change models

T2 - a processual approach

AU - Dawson, Patrick Mark

PY - 1996/12

Y1 - 1996/12

N2 - This article provides a critical appraisal of situational frameworks and for mulates an alternative perspective. Contingency theory is briefly examined and the Australian change model of Dunphy and Stace is outlined and crit icized. It is then shown how contextualist research views longitudinal research methodologies to be the most appropriate for studying the processes by which change unfolds. Building on this work, a processual perspective is formulated which advocates that the context, substance and the politics of change are all central to explanations of organizational transition. The article concludes by suggesting that conventional change models be replaced by processual frame works which are better able to explain the complex ongoing dynamic of organ izational change.

AB - This article provides a critical appraisal of situational frameworks and for mulates an alternative perspective. Contingency theory is briefly examined and the Australian change model of Dunphy and Stace is outlined and crit icized. It is then shown how contextualist research views longitudinal research methodologies to be the most appropriate for studying the processes by which change unfolds. Building on this work, a processual perspective is formulated which advocates that the context, substance and the politics of change are all central to explanations of organizational transition. The article concludes by suggesting that conventional change models be replaced by processual frame works which are better able to explain the complex ongoing dynamic of organ izational change.

U2 - 10.1177/103841119603400207

DO - 10.1177/103841119603400207

M3 - Article

VL - 34

SP - 57

EP - 70

JO - Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources

JF - Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources

SN - 1038-4111

IS - 2

ER -