Beyond evidence

a critical appraisal of global warming as a socio-scientific issue and a reflection on the changing nature of scientific literacy in school

L. Colucci-Gray

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)
6 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Tom G. K. Bryce and Stephen P. Day’s (2013) original article on scepticism and doubt in science education explores the context of citizens’ attitudes towards the complexities and uncertainties of global issues, namely global warming. This response aims to stimulate reflection on some of the implicit assumptions underpinning the relationships between science, technology and the public. I argue that an underestimation of the political and ethical dimensions of science and technology limits the possibilities for education to set the agenda for citizens’ participation in science and technological matters. Drawing on Sheila Jasanoff’s model of co-production, this paper proposes a radical re-affirmation of the aims and purposes of science education to embrace a multiplicity of disciplines, narratives and ways of knowing in science, technology and society issues.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)633-647
Number of pages15
JournalCultural Studies of Science Education
Volume9
Issue number3
Early online date20 Dec 2013
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2014

Fingerprint

literacy
science
school
evidence
education
coproduction
citizens' participation
uncertainty
citizen
narrative

Keywords

  • socio-scientific issues
  • evidence
  • plurality
  • dialogue

Cite this

@article{b66de1f650b64286ad0d864766f291d6,
title = "Beyond evidence: a critical appraisal of global warming as a socio-scientific issue and a reflection on the changing nature of scientific literacy in school",
abstract = "Tom G. K. Bryce and Stephen P. Day’s (2013) original article on scepticism and doubt in science education explores the context of citizens’ attitudes towards the complexities and uncertainties of global issues, namely global warming. This response aims to stimulate reflection on some of the implicit assumptions underpinning the relationships between science, technology and the public. I argue that an underestimation of the political and ethical dimensions of science and technology limits the possibilities for education to set the agenda for citizens’ participation in science and technological matters. Drawing on Sheila Jasanoff’s model of co-production, this paper proposes a radical re-affirmation of the aims and purposes of science education to embrace a multiplicity of disciplines, narratives and ways of knowing in science, technology and society issues.",
keywords = "socio-scientific issues, evidence, plurality, dialogue",
author = "L. Colucci-Gray",
year = "2014",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1007/s11422-013-9556-x",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "633--647",
journal = "Cultural Studies of Science Education",
issn = "1871-1502",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Beyond evidence

T2 - a critical appraisal of global warming as a socio-scientific issue and a reflection on the changing nature of scientific literacy in school

AU - Colucci-Gray, L.

PY - 2014/9

Y1 - 2014/9

N2 - Tom G. K. Bryce and Stephen P. Day’s (2013) original article on scepticism and doubt in science education explores the context of citizens’ attitudes towards the complexities and uncertainties of global issues, namely global warming. This response aims to stimulate reflection on some of the implicit assumptions underpinning the relationships between science, technology and the public. I argue that an underestimation of the political and ethical dimensions of science and technology limits the possibilities for education to set the agenda for citizens’ participation in science and technological matters. Drawing on Sheila Jasanoff’s model of co-production, this paper proposes a radical re-affirmation of the aims and purposes of science education to embrace a multiplicity of disciplines, narratives and ways of knowing in science, technology and society issues.

AB - Tom G. K. Bryce and Stephen P. Day’s (2013) original article on scepticism and doubt in science education explores the context of citizens’ attitudes towards the complexities and uncertainties of global issues, namely global warming. This response aims to stimulate reflection on some of the implicit assumptions underpinning the relationships between science, technology and the public. I argue that an underestimation of the political and ethical dimensions of science and technology limits the possibilities for education to set the agenda for citizens’ participation in science and technological matters. Drawing on Sheila Jasanoff’s model of co-production, this paper proposes a radical re-affirmation of the aims and purposes of science education to embrace a multiplicity of disciplines, narratives and ways of knowing in science, technology and society issues.

KW - socio-scientific issues

KW - evidence

KW - plurality

KW - dialogue

U2 - 10.1007/s11422-013-9556-x

DO - 10.1007/s11422-013-9556-x

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 633

EP - 647

JO - Cultural Studies of Science Education

JF - Cultural Studies of Science Education

SN - 1871-1502

IS - 3

ER -