Beyond the Neuro-Realism Fallacy

From John R. Mallard’s Hand-painted MRI Image of a Mouse to BioArt Scenarios

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This article examines visual practices inside the laboratory and in the arts, highlighting a problem of reductionism in the transformation from data to images and in the visual incarnation of the neuro-realism fallacy, that is the extreme images of brain scan. Neurosciences are not inherently reductionist. John R. Mallard’s work around data visualisation problems in the development of biomedical imaging shows how scientists themselves can be attentive to the construction of visual practices and their meaning. If neuro-realism is a fallacy within the neurosciences, are art-neuroscience collaborative projects reproducing this fallacy at visual level? The article analysis how neuroscience-art projects can enable us (or not) to foster and maintain a stereoscopic vision in the way in which we approach the conundrum of what it is like to be both a biological organism made up of molecules, neurons, cells, and an entity equipped with intentionality, desires, thoughts, values.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)440-471
Number of pages32
JournalNuncius. Journal of the Material and Visual History of Science
Volume32
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 18 May 2017

Fingerprint

Scenarios
Neuroscience
Realism
Fallacies
Mouse
Art
Reductionism
Molecules
Art Projects
Cells
Neuron
Collaborative Projects
Visualization
Reductionist
Entity
Intentionality
Incarnation
Imaging
Stereoscopic Vision
Organism

Keywords

  • visualisation
  • neuro-realism fallacy
  • BioArt

Cite this

@article{33daef5ad71145e5bf5e0a51a526d30a,
title = "Beyond the Neuro-Realism Fallacy: From John R. Mallard’s Hand-painted MRI Image of a Mouse to BioArt Scenarios",
abstract = "This article examines visual practices inside the laboratory and in the arts, highlighting a problem of reductionism in the transformation from data to images and in the visual incarnation of the neuro-realism fallacy, that is the extreme images of brain scan. Neurosciences are not inherently reductionist. John R. Mallard’s work around data visualisation problems in the development of biomedical imaging shows how scientists themselves can be attentive to the construction of visual practices and their meaning. If neuro-realism is a fallacy within the neurosciences, are art-neuroscience collaborative projects reproducing this fallacy at visual level? The article analysis how neuroscience-art projects can enable us (or not) to foster and maintain a stereoscopic vision in the way in which we approach the conundrum of what it is like to be both a biological organism made up of molecules, neurons, cells, and an entity equipped with intentionality, desires, thoughts, values.",
keywords = "visualisation, neuro-realism fallacy, BioArt",
author = "Silvia Casini",
year = "2017",
month = "5",
day = "18",
doi = "10.1163/18253911-03202005",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "440--471",
journal = "Nuncius. Journal of the Material and Visual History of Science",
publisher = "Brill",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Beyond the Neuro-Realism Fallacy

T2 - From John R. Mallard’s Hand-painted MRI Image of a Mouse to BioArt Scenarios

AU - Casini, Silvia

PY - 2017/5/18

Y1 - 2017/5/18

N2 - This article examines visual practices inside the laboratory and in the arts, highlighting a problem of reductionism in the transformation from data to images and in the visual incarnation of the neuro-realism fallacy, that is the extreme images of brain scan. Neurosciences are not inherently reductionist. John R. Mallard’s work around data visualisation problems in the development of biomedical imaging shows how scientists themselves can be attentive to the construction of visual practices and their meaning. If neuro-realism is a fallacy within the neurosciences, are art-neuroscience collaborative projects reproducing this fallacy at visual level? The article analysis how neuroscience-art projects can enable us (or not) to foster and maintain a stereoscopic vision in the way in which we approach the conundrum of what it is like to be both a biological organism made up of molecules, neurons, cells, and an entity equipped with intentionality, desires, thoughts, values.

AB - This article examines visual practices inside the laboratory and in the arts, highlighting a problem of reductionism in the transformation from data to images and in the visual incarnation of the neuro-realism fallacy, that is the extreme images of brain scan. Neurosciences are not inherently reductionist. John R. Mallard’s work around data visualisation problems in the development of biomedical imaging shows how scientists themselves can be attentive to the construction of visual practices and their meaning. If neuro-realism is a fallacy within the neurosciences, are art-neuroscience collaborative projects reproducing this fallacy at visual level? The article analysis how neuroscience-art projects can enable us (or not) to foster and maintain a stereoscopic vision in the way in which we approach the conundrum of what it is like to be both a biological organism made up of molecules, neurons, cells, and an entity equipped with intentionality, desires, thoughts, values.

KW - visualisation

KW - neuro-realism fallacy

KW - BioArt

U2 - 10.1163/18253911-03202005

DO - 10.1163/18253911-03202005

M3 - Article

VL - 32

SP - 440

EP - 471

JO - Nuncius. Journal of the Material and Visual History of Science

JF - Nuncius. Journal of the Material and Visual History of Science

IS - 2

ER -