Bidialectalism or dialect death? Explaining generational change in the Shetland Islands, Scotland

Jennifer Smith, Mercedes Durham

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article investigates the use of traditional dialect forms in a community
in Shetland, northern Scotland. Specifically, we seek to establish whether the
younger generations’ patterns of language use signal rapid dialect obsolescence or bidialectalism. It compares recordings in which audience design is manipulated—the addressee is either an insider or an outsider—across a range of lexical, phonological, and morphosyntactic variables. Results show that only some of the younger speakers are bidialectal: the remaining speakers use virtually no dialect forms. These findings may signal dialect shift and a move from local to standard in the coming generations.
The article further explores the linguistic details of the bidialectal speakers’ language use through a qualitative and quantitative comparison of forms across the different recordings. It finds that the use of the two varieties operates on a continuum, where rates of use differ but constraints remain the same across the two speech styles. It discusses these findings against the backdrop of bidialectalism and the process of dialect obsolescence in the British Isles and elsewhere.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)57-88
Number of pages31
JournalAmerican Speech
Volume87
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Fingerprint

Obsolescence
dialect
death
Linguistics
recording
language
Shetland
Scotland
linguistics
Language Use

Cite this

Bidialectalism or dialect death? Explaining generational change in the Shetland Islands, Scotland. / Smith, Jennifer; Durham, Mercedes.

In: American Speech, Vol. 87, No. 1, 2012, p. 57-88.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Smith, Jennifer ; Durham, Mercedes. / Bidialectalism or dialect death? Explaining generational change in the Shetland Islands, Scotland. In: American Speech. 2012 ; Vol. 87, No. 1. pp. 57-88.
@article{a979ad1c44854e638c89200ba6d00afa,
title = "Bidialectalism or dialect death?: Explaining generational change in the Shetland Islands, Scotland",
abstract = "This article investigates the use of traditional dialect forms in a communityin Shetland, northern Scotland. Specifically, we seek to establish whether theyounger generations’ patterns of language use signal rapid dialect obsolescence or bidialectalism. It compares recordings in which audience design is manipulated—the addressee is either an insider or an outsider—across a range of lexical, phonological, and morphosyntactic variables. Results show that only some of the younger speakers are bidialectal: the remaining speakers use virtually no dialect forms. These findings may signal dialect shift and a move from local to standard in the coming generations.The article further explores the linguistic details of the bidialectal speakers’ language use through a qualitative and quantitative comparison of forms across the different recordings. It finds that the use of the two varieties operates on a continuum, where rates of use differ but constraints remain the same across the two speech styles. It discusses these findings against the backdrop of bidialectalism and the process of dialect obsolescence in the British Isles and elsewhere.",
author = "Jennifer Smith and Mercedes Durham",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1215/00031283-1599959",
language = "English",
volume = "87",
pages = "57--88",
journal = "American Speech",
issn = "0003-1283",
publisher = "Duke University Press",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Bidialectalism or dialect death?

T2 - Explaining generational change in the Shetland Islands, Scotland

AU - Smith, Jennifer

AU - Durham, Mercedes

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - This article investigates the use of traditional dialect forms in a communityin Shetland, northern Scotland. Specifically, we seek to establish whether theyounger generations’ patterns of language use signal rapid dialect obsolescence or bidialectalism. It compares recordings in which audience design is manipulated—the addressee is either an insider or an outsider—across a range of lexical, phonological, and morphosyntactic variables. Results show that only some of the younger speakers are bidialectal: the remaining speakers use virtually no dialect forms. These findings may signal dialect shift and a move from local to standard in the coming generations.The article further explores the linguistic details of the bidialectal speakers’ language use through a qualitative and quantitative comparison of forms across the different recordings. It finds that the use of the two varieties operates on a continuum, where rates of use differ but constraints remain the same across the two speech styles. It discusses these findings against the backdrop of bidialectalism and the process of dialect obsolescence in the British Isles and elsewhere.

AB - This article investigates the use of traditional dialect forms in a communityin Shetland, northern Scotland. Specifically, we seek to establish whether theyounger generations’ patterns of language use signal rapid dialect obsolescence or bidialectalism. It compares recordings in which audience design is manipulated—the addressee is either an insider or an outsider—across a range of lexical, phonological, and morphosyntactic variables. Results show that only some of the younger speakers are bidialectal: the remaining speakers use virtually no dialect forms. These findings may signal dialect shift and a move from local to standard in the coming generations.The article further explores the linguistic details of the bidialectal speakers’ language use through a qualitative and quantitative comparison of forms across the different recordings. It finds that the use of the two varieties operates on a continuum, where rates of use differ but constraints remain the same across the two speech styles. It discusses these findings against the backdrop of bidialectalism and the process of dialect obsolescence in the British Isles and elsewhere.

U2 - 10.1215/00031283-1599959

DO - 10.1215/00031283-1599959

M3 - Article

VL - 87

SP - 57

EP - 88

JO - American Speech

JF - American Speech

SN - 0003-1283

IS - 1

ER -