Bimodal or quadrimodal? Statistical tests for the shape of fault patterns

David Healy, Peter Jupp

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Natural fault patterns, formed in response to a single tectonic event, often display significant variation in their orientation distribution. The cause of this variation is the subject of some debate: it could be ‘noise’ on underlying conjugate (or bimodal) fault patterns or it could be intrinsic ‘signal’ from an underlying polymodal (e.g. quadrimodal) pattern. In this contribution, we present new statistical tests to assess the probability of a fault pattern having two (bimodal, or conjugate) or four (quadrimodal) underlying modes and orthorhombic symmetry. We use the eigenvalues of the 2nd and 4th rank orientation tensors, derived from the direction cosines of the poles to the fault planes, as the basis for our tests. Using a combination of the existing fabric eigenvalue (or modified Flinn) plot and our new tests, we can discriminate reliably between bimodal (conjugate) and quadrimodal fault patterns. We validate our tests using synthetic fault orientation datasets constructed from multimodal Watson distributions, and then assess six natural fault datasets from outcrops and earthquake focal plane solutions. We show that five out of six of these natural datasets are probably quadrimodal and orthorhombic. The tests have been implemented in the R language and a link is given to the authors’ source code.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1051-160
Number of pages10
JournalSolid earth
Volume9
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 22 Aug 2018

Fingerprint

statistical tests
Statistical tests
Tectonics
Tensors
Poles
Earthquakes
statistical analysis
testing
eigenvalue
eigenvalues
tectonics
earthquakes
outcrops
fault plane
poles
plots
symmetry
Direction compound
test
tensors

Cite this

Bimodal or quadrimodal? Statistical tests for the shape of fault patterns. / Healy, David; Jupp, Peter.

In: Solid earth, Vol. 9, No. 4, 22.08.2018, p. 1051-160.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{090fcabff3834339aa22130c4f6bd771,
title = "Bimodal or quadrimodal? Statistical tests for the shape of fault patterns",
abstract = "Natural fault patterns, formed in response to a single tectonic event, often display significant variation in their orientation distribution. The cause of this variation is the subject of some debate: it could be ‘noise’ on underlying conjugate (or bimodal) fault patterns or it could be intrinsic ‘signal’ from an underlying polymodal (e.g. quadrimodal) pattern. In this contribution, we present new statistical tests to assess the probability of a fault pattern having two (bimodal, or conjugate) or four (quadrimodal) underlying modes and orthorhombic symmetry. We use the eigenvalues of the 2nd and 4th rank orientation tensors, derived from the direction cosines of the poles to the fault planes, as the basis for our tests. Using a combination of the existing fabric eigenvalue (or modified Flinn) plot and our new tests, we can discriminate reliably between bimodal (conjugate) and quadrimodal fault patterns. We validate our tests using synthetic fault orientation datasets constructed from multimodal Watson distributions, and then assess six natural fault datasets from outcrops and earthquake focal plane solutions. We show that five out of six of these natural datasets are probably quadrimodal and orthorhombic. The tests have been implemented in the R language and a link is given to the authors’ source code.",
author = "David Healy and Peter Jupp",
note = "DH gratefully acknowledges receipt of NERC grant NE/N003063/1, and thanks the School of Geosciences at the University of Aberdeen for accommodating a period of research study leave, during which time this paper was written. We thank two anonymous reviewers, plus Atilla Aydin (Stanford) and Nigel Woodcock (Cambridge) for comments which helped us improve the paper.",
year = "2018",
month = "8",
day = "22",
doi = "10.5194/se-9-1051-2018",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "1051--160",
journal = "Solid earth",
issn = "1869-9510",
publisher = "Copernicus Gesellschaft mbH",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Bimodal or quadrimodal? Statistical tests for the shape of fault patterns

AU - Healy, David

AU - Jupp, Peter

N1 - DH gratefully acknowledges receipt of NERC grant NE/N003063/1, and thanks the School of Geosciences at the University of Aberdeen for accommodating a period of research study leave, during which time this paper was written. We thank two anonymous reviewers, plus Atilla Aydin (Stanford) and Nigel Woodcock (Cambridge) for comments which helped us improve the paper.

PY - 2018/8/22

Y1 - 2018/8/22

N2 - Natural fault patterns, formed in response to a single tectonic event, often display significant variation in their orientation distribution. The cause of this variation is the subject of some debate: it could be ‘noise’ on underlying conjugate (or bimodal) fault patterns or it could be intrinsic ‘signal’ from an underlying polymodal (e.g. quadrimodal) pattern. In this contribution, we present new statistical tests to assess the probability of a fault pattern having two (bimodal, or conjugate) or four (quadrimodal) underlying modes and orthorhombic symmetry. We use the eigenvalues of the 2nd and 4th rank orientation tensors, derived from the direction cosines of the poles to the fault planes, as the basis for our tests. Using a combination of the existing fabric eigenvalue (or modified Flinn) plot and our new tests, we can discriminate reliably between bimodal (conjugate) and quadrimodal fault patterns. We validate our tests using synthetic fault orientation datasets constructed from multimodal Watson distributions, and then assess six natural fault datasets from outcrops and earthquake focal plane solutions. We show that five out of six of these natural datasets are probably quadrimodal and orthorhombic. The tests have been implemented in the R language and a link is given to the authors’ source code.

AB - Natural fault patterns, formed in response to a single tectonic event, often display significant variation in their orientation distribution. The cause of this variation is the subject of some debate: it could be ‘noise’ on underlying conjugate (or bimodal) fault patterns or it could be intrinsic ‘signal’ from an underlying polymodal (e.g. quadrimodal) pattern. In this contribution, we present new statistical tests to assess the probability of a fault pattern having two (bimodal, or conjugate) or four (quadrimodal) underlying modes and orthorhombic symmetry. We use the eigenvalues of the 2nd and 4th rank orientation tensors, derived from the direction cosines of the poles to the fault planes, as the basis for our tests. Using a combination of the existing fabric eigenvalue (or modified Flinn) plot and our new tests, we can discriminate reliably between bimodal (conjugate) and quadrimodal fault patterns. We validate our tests using synthetic fault orientation datasets constructed from multimodal Watson distributions, and then assess six natural fault datasets from outcrops and earthquake focal plane solutions. We show that five out of six of these natural datasets are probably quadrimodal and orthorhombic. The tests have been implemented in the R language and a link is given to the authors’ source code.

U2 - 10.5194/se-9-1051-2018

DO - 10.5194/se-9-1051-2018

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 1051

EP - 1160

JO - Solid earth

JF - Solid earth

SN - 1869-9510

IS - 4

ER -