TY - JOUR
T1 - Biological and psychological mediators of the relationships between fat mass, fat-free mass and energy intake
AU - Hopkins, Mark
AU - Finlayson, Graham
AU - Duarte, Cristiana
AU - Gibbons, Catherine
AU - Johnstone, Alexandra M
AU - Whybrow, Stephen
AU - Horgan, Graham W
AU - Blundell, John E
AU - Stubbs, R James
N1 - Acknowledgements The authors’ responsibilities were as follows:
RJS, GWH, AMJ and SW conceived the project; RJS, SW, AMJ and
the project team (Leona O’Reilley and Zoe Fuller) conducted the
research. CD, GWH, MH and RJS analysed the data and performed the
statistical analysis. MH, GF, CG, JB and RJS wrote the initial
manuscript, while all authors commented on the manuscript. RJS had
primary responsibility for final content. The authors report no personal
or financial conflicts of interest. The present study was funded by the
Food Standards Agency, UK, and The Scottish Government’s Rural
and Environment Science and Analytical Services Division. None of
the funding bodies had a role in the design, analysis or writing of this
article.
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - Background
While recent studies indicate that in humans fat-free mass (FFM) is closely associated with energy intake (EI) when in energy balance, associations between fat mass (FM) and EI are inconsistent.
Objectives
The present study used a cross-sectional design to examine the indirect and direct effects of FFM, FM and resting metabolic rate (RMR) on EI in individuals at or close to energy balance.
Methods
Data for 242 individuals (114 males; 128 females; BMI = 25.7 ± 4.9 kg/m2) were collated from the non-intervention baseline conditions of five studies employing common measures of body composition (air-displacement plethysmography), RMR (indirect calorimetry) and psychometric measures of eating behaviours (Dutch Eating Behaviour Questionnaire). Daily EI (weighed dietary records) and energy expenditure (flex heart rate) were measured for 6–7 days. Sub-analyses were conducted in 71 individuals who had additional measures of body composition (dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry) and fasting glucose, insulin and leptin.
Results
After adjusting for age, sex and study, linear regression and mediation analyses indicated that the effect of FFM on EI was mediated by RMR (P < 0.05). FM also independently predicted EI, with path analysis indicating a positive indirect association (mediated by RMR; P < 0.05), and a stronger direct negative association (P < 0.05). Leptin, insulin and insulin resistance failed to predict EI, but cognitive restraint was a determinant of EI and partially mediated the association between FM and EI (P < 0.05).
Conclusions
While the association between FFM and EI was mediated by RMR, FM influenced EI via two separate and opposing pathways; an indirect ‘excitatory’ effect (again, mediated by RMR), and a stronger direct ‘inhibitory’ effect. Psychological factors such as cognitive restraint remain robust predictors of EI when considered alongside physiological determinants of EI, and indeed, have the potential to play a mediating role in the overall expression of EI.
AB - Background
While recent studies indicate that in humans fat-free mass (FFM) is closely associated with energy intake (EI) when in energy balance, associations between fat mass (FM) and EI are inconsistent.
Objectives
The present study used a cross-sectional design to examine the indirect and direct effects of FFM, FM and resting metabolic rate (RMR) on EI in individuals at or close to energy balance.
Methods
Data for 242 individuals (114 males; 128 females; BMI = 25.7 ± 4.9 kg/m2) were collated from the non-intervention baseline conditions of five studies employing common measures of body composition (air-displacement plethysmography), RMR (indirect calorimetry) and psychometric measures of eating behaviours (Dutch Eating Behaviour Questionnaire). Daily EI (weighed dietary records) and energy expenditure (flex heart rate) were measured for 6–7 days. Sub-analyses were conducted in 71 individuals who had additional measures of body composition (dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry) and fasting glucose, insulin and leptin.
Results
After adjusting for age, sex and study, linear regression and mediation analyses indicated that the effect of FFM on EI was mediated by RMR (P < 0.05). FM also independently predicted EI, with path analysis indicating a positive indirect association (mediated by RMR; P < 0.05), and a stronger direct negative association (P < 0.05). Leptin, insulin and insulin resistance failed to predict EI, but cognitive restraint was a determinant of EI and partially mediated the association between FM and EI (P < 0.05).
Conclusions
While the association between FFM and EI was mediated by RMR, FM influenced EI via two separate and opposing pathways; an indirect ‘excitatory’ effect (again, mediated by RMR), and a stronger direct ‘inhibitory’ effect. Psychological factors such as cognitive restraint remain robust predictors of EI when considered alongside physiological determinants of EI, and indeed, have the potential to play a mediating role in the overall expression of EI.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85046158250&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/biological-psychological-mediators-relationships-between-fat-mass-fatfree-mass-energy-intake
U2 - 10.1038/s41366-018-0059-4
DO - 10.1038/s41366-018-0059-4
M3 - Article
VL - 43
SP - 233
EP - 242
JO - International Journal of Obesity
JF - International Journal of Obesity
SN - 0307-0565
ER -